Advertisement

Specialty Certification in Professional Psychology

  • Ted Packard
  • Carla J. Reyes

Abstract

Since the mid 20th century an increasing number of psychologists have provided a variety of psychological services to the public and have identified themselves as “professional psychologists” This rapid development has resulted in psychology being recognized as a profession by our society in a fashion somewhat similar to the traditional professions of medicine, law, and the clergy. In achieving this recognition, professional psychology has had to measure up to five key criteria that define areas of professional and skilled practice in ours and many other societies.

Keywords

American Psychological Association Health Service Provider Board Certification Professional Psychology Specialty Area 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Board of Medical Specialties (2000). Annual Report & Reference Handbook. Evanston, IL: Author.Google Scholar
  2. American Board of Medical Specialties (n.d.). Retrieved March 2, 2002, from http//www.abms.org/statistics.asp/Google Scholar
  3. American Board of Professional Psychology (1993). Application manual for specialty recognition and affiliation with the American Board of Professional Psychology. Columbia, MO: Author.Google Scholar
  4. American Board of Professional Psychology (2001). Operations Manual. Jefferson City, MO.Google Scholar
  5. American Board of Professional Psychology (n.d.). Retrieved March 2, 2002, from http//www.abpp.org/Google Scholar
  6. American Psychological Association (1984). Specialization in psychology: Principles. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  7. American Psychological Association (1992). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 47, 1597–1611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. American Psychological Association (2000a). Book 1: Guidelines and principles for accreditation of programs in professional psychology; Book 2: Accreditation operating procedures of the committee on accreditation. Washington,DC: Author.Google Scholar
  9. American Psychological Association (2000b). Committee on Accreditation Annual Report. Washington, DC:Author.Google Scholar
  10. American Psychological Association (n.d.). Retrieved March 23, 2002 from, http://www.apa.org/crsppp/homepage.html/Google Scholar
  11. Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards (2001 a). Handbook of licensing and certification requirements for psychologists in the U. S. and Canada. Montgomery, AL: Author.Google Scholar
  12. Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards (2001b). Code of conduct. Montgomery, AL: Author.Google Scholar
  13. Bass, L. J., DeMers. S. T., Ogloff, J. R. P., Peterson, C., Pettifor, J. L., Reaves, R. P., Retfalvi, T., Simon, N. P., Sinclair, C.,& Tipton, R. M. (1996). Professional conduct and discipline in psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, and Montgomery, AL: Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Belar, C. D., & Perry, N. W. (1992). The national conference on scientist practitioner education and training for the professional practice of psychology. American Psychologist, 47, 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bent, R. J., Packard, R. E., & Goldberg, R. W. (1999). The American Board of Professional Psychology, 1947 to 1997:A historical perspective. Professional Psychology: Researach and Practice, 30, 65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Council of Specialties (n.d.). Retrieved March 23, 2002 from, http://www.cospp.org/Google Scholar
  17. Dattilio, F. M. (2002). Board certification in psychology: Is it really necessary? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33, 54–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Drum, D. J., & Blom, B. E. (2001). The dynamics of specialization in professional psychology. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 32, 513–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Golding, S. (1999, August). The voirdire of forensic experts: Issues of qualification and training. Paper presented at the 1999 annual convention of the American Psychological Association, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  20. Hansen, M. (2000, February). Expertise to go. American Bar Association Journal 86, 44–52.Google Scholar
  21. National Association of Social Workers (n.d.). Retrieved March 3, 2002. from http//www.socialworkers.org/credentials/default.htm/Google Scholar
  22. National Board for Certified Counselors (n.d.). Retrieved March 3, 2002, from http://www.nbcc.org/Google Scholar
  23. National Register of Health Service Providers in Psychology (n.d.). Retrieved March 25. 2002, from http://www.nationalregister.org/Google Scholar
  24. Packard, T. (2001, Summer). Why ABPP is necessary and essential. The Diplomats 20, 1, 10.Google Scholar
  25. Otto. R. K., & Heilbrun, K. (2002). The practice of forensic psychology: A look toward the future in light of the past.American Psychologist, 57, 5–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shore, K. (1998). Managed care and managed competition: A question of morality. In R. F. Small & L. R.Barnhill (Eds.), Practicing in the new mental health marketplace: Ethical, legal, and moral issues (pp. 67–102).Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ted Packard
    • 1
  • Carla J. Reyes
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Educational PsychologyUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations