Advertisement

Integration of Technologies for E-Business Management

  • Pradeep Kumar Ray
Part of the Network and Systems Management book series (NASM)

Abstract

As discussed in Chapters 5 to 7, e-business management presents many different concepts, architectures, technologies and standards. To integrate these different paradigms it is necessary to think about the interoperability of different standards and technologies. Integration and interoperability of ebusiness management may be considered with respect to the following dimensions:
  • Types of business (healthcare, telecommunications, finance etc.)

  • Functions and Process (e.g., Business, Service, Infrastructure levels)

  • Lifecycle (requirements, design, evaluation etc.)

Keywords

Unify Modeling Language Integrate Management Telecommunication Industry Common Object Request Broker Architecture Operation Support System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Chmaj J., “Customer Support Consortium Update”, DMTF Developers Conference, May 2000, USAGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Deitel H.M, Deitel P.J. and Steinbuhler K., E-Business and E-Commerce for Managers,Prentice Hall, 2001, ISBN:0–13–032364–0Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    DMTF, “CIM Tutorial”, http://www.dmtf.org/spec/cim_tutorial/, March 2001Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    DMTF, “Web Based Enterprise Management (WBEM) Standards”, http://www.dmtf.org/spec/wbem.html, March 2001Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    DMTF, “DMTF-CSC Support Standards”, http://www.dmtf.org/spec/stan.html, March 2001Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Entrust Technologies, “e-business Solutions for the Telecommunications Industry”, http://www.entrust-technologies.com.au, Company white paper released in April 2001Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Goldman and Sachs, “Where the Money Is: B2B-Money is in the profiling B2B buyers”, 6 January 2000:30, http://www.iconocast.com/issue/20000010603.html Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hamada T., Kamata H. and Hogg S., “An Overview of TINA Management Architecture”, Journal of Network and Systems Management, Vol. 5, No. 4, December 1997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    IBM, “An Open e-Business Foundation”, IBM E-Business White Paper, 1997Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    IT Service Management Forum (ITSMF), “ITSMF-DMTF Alliance”, DMTF Developers Conference, June 2000, USAGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), “Application MIB”, 1998, http://www.ietf.org Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    ITU-T Recommendation X.790 (11/95) - Trouble Management function for ITU-T applications, http://www.itu.int/plwebcgi/fastweb
  13. 13.
    International Telecommunications Union (ITU-T), “TMN Roadmap”, http://www.itu.int/TMN/, 1997Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    ITU-T X.901 I ISO/IEC 10746–1: Open Distributed Processing Reference Model - Part 1, 1997Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kavanagh D., “Establishing an End-to-end Integrated Management Platform by Combining Network and Service Management with Operational Support Systems (OSS’s)”, Forge Australia White Paper, http://www.forge.com. au/products/Papers, December 1999Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lawrence D.G., “Service Incident and Knowledge Exchange”, DMTF Developers Conference, June 2000, USAGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lewis D., “A Review of Approach to Developing Service Management Systems”, Journal of Network and Systems Management (JNSM), Vol. 8, No. 2, June 2000Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lucent Technologies, “Business Transaction Management”, A Vitalsoft White Paper, August 2000, http://www.lucentservices.com/knowledge/whitepapers/index.asp Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Object Management Group (OMG), “Common Object Request Broker Architecture (CORBA) Common Facilities”, http://www.omg.org
  20. 20.
    Orfali R., Harkey D., and Edwards J., Client/Server Survival Guide, John Wiley & Sons, 1999, ISBN: 0–471–31615–6Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Organization of Government Commerce (OGC formerly CCTA), “ITIL and BSI Code of Practice on IT Service Management”, IT Service Management Forum (ITSMF) web site in UK, http://www.itsmf.com/itsmf/i2.htm, April 2001Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ray P., Cooperative Management of Enterprise Networks, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publications, May 2000, ISBN:0–306–46276–1Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shrewsbury J.K., “An Introduction to TMN”, Journal of Network and Systems Management (JNSM), Vol. 3, No. 1, March 1995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Telecommunications Information Networking Architecture Consortium (TINA-C), “TINA Business Model and Reference Points”, Version 4.0, May 1997Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tele Management Forum (TMF), “A Service Management Business Process Model”, 1995.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tele Management Forum (TMF), “OMNIPoint Integration Architecture”, Forum TR114, 1994Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tele Management Forum (TMF), “Service Provider’s Integrated Requirements for Information Technology (SPIRT)”, http://www.nmf.org/books.htm#spirit, Jan 1996Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tele Management Forum (TMF), “Solution and Component Sets”, http://www.nmf.org/sets.htm, 1997Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    TeleManagement Forum (TMF), “Performance Reporting Definitions Document”, NMF701, April 1997Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    TeleManagement Forum, Telecom Operations Map (pdf version 1.3) GB910, October 2000, http://www.tmforum.org/ Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    TeleManagement Forum, “Service Quality Management Business Agreement”, http://www.tmforum.org/
  32. 32.
    TeleManagement Forum, “Smart TMN Technology Integration Map”, GB909 issue 1.1, October 1998, http://www.tmforum.org/ Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Umar A., Object-Oriented Client/Server Internet Environments, Prentice Hall, 1997Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zhaner E., “Ahoy, Internet Companies”, USA Today, 7 June 2000Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pradeep Kumar Ray
    • 1
  1. 1.University of New South WalesSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations