Abstract
The contamination of MTBE in ground water has introduced concerns about the increased cost of remediating MTBE/BTEX releases compared to remediating sites with BTEX only contamination. In an attempt to evaluate these costs, cost information for 311 MTBE-blended gasoline release sites was furnished by the USEPA Office of Underground Storage Tanks (OUST) (USEPA, 2000), several states, BP/Amoco, Creek and Davidson (1998), and other sources. The majority of the sites were from South Carolina (183), Kansas (53), and New York (32), with information from sites in Maine, Texas, California, and Illinois also included. The reported information were project costs, actual costs, estimated project costs, or estimated project costs to date and included site assessment costs, capital expenditures, and operation and maintenance expenses. Site-specific cost data, average operation and maintenance expenses, and total project costs for several sites, primarily in California and on the East Coast, were provided by BP/Amoco (Kolhatkar, 2000).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Chen, J.S. and Fishman, M. 1999. Critical Review: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Natural Attenuation in the Risk Management of Petroleum Hydrocarbon Plumes. Prepared by Dynamac Corporation for USEPA Subsurface Protection and Remediation Division, National Risk Management Research Center, Ada, Oklahoma.
Creek, D.N, and Davidson, J.M. 1998. The performance and cost of MTBE remediation technologies. In: Proceedings of the 1998 Petroleum Hydrocarbons and Organic Chemicals in Groundwater Conference. Houston, Texas. November 11-13, 1998.
Hattan, G. 2000. Kansas Department of Health and Environment. Personal communication.
Kolhatkar, R. 2000. BP/Amoco. Personal communication.
USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2000. Office of Underground Storage Tanks. Washington, DC. Doug Maddox and Steve Mc-Neely. OUST State Survey: State of South Carolina: Art Shrader, DHEC. State of Kansas: Bill Reetz and Greg Hattan, KDHE. State of Florida: Tom Conrardy, DEP. State of Maine: Bruce Hunter, Maine DER State of New York: D. Darmer, NY DEC. Information concerning Ohio and Illinois was provided by Gilberto Alvarez, U.S. EPA, Region 5 UST Program. Some information was provided to OUST by Linda Fiedler, U.S. EPA, DC through Tetra Tech EM Inc., Reston VA.
Wilson, B.H., Shen, H., Pope, D., and Schemelling, S. 2001. Cost of MTBE remediation. In: Bioremediation of MTBE, Alcohols, and Ethers, The Sixth International In Situ and On-Site Bioremediation Symposium, San Diego, California. June 4-7, 2001. (Magar, V.S., Gibbs, J.T., O’Reilly, K.T., Hyman, M.R., and Leeson, A., Eds.). Columbus, Ohio, Battelle Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Amherst Scientific Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wilson, B.H., Wilson, J.T. (2003). Remedial Costs for MTBE in Soil and Ground Water. In: Moyer, E.E., Kostecki, P.T. (eds) MTBE Remediation Handbook. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0021-6_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0021-6_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-4889-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0021-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive