Skip to main content

The Use of Social Media in the Public Sector: Some Lessons from the Netherlands

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Measuring E-government Efficiency

Part of the book series: Public Administration and Information Technology ((PAIT,volume 5))

  • 1489 Accesses

Abstract

Under the label of E-government, governments are undertaking different activities that are directly related to the development of the modern information society. In this chapter, we will focus on a specific communicative challenge of E-government, namely, the use of social media tools by civil servants. Social media are rapidly penetrating the modern information society. This new generation of digital applications emphasizes the importance of user-participation, content-sharing, and accessible communication. Both companies and governmental agencies are exploring carefully the possibilities of social media to communicate with customers or citizens. An important reason is the assumption that the use of social media can result in governments that operate more effectively and efficiently. However, for civil servants the utilization of social media brings both challenges and risks. This chapter analyzes the challenges, risks, and dilemmas of social media for Dutch civil servants. The theoretical framework that is used consists of a “classical” and a “modern” approach to civil servants. In the classical “Weberian” model, politicians are responsible for policy making (and communication about it) and civil servants have to implement policies (“the primacy of politics”). This “principal” approach implies a limited role of civil servants in the virtual world of social media. On the other hand, the “modern” approach to civil servants highlights the professional expertise and distinctive responsibilities of civil servants. The “pragmatic” approach leaves more space for active participation of civil servants on the Internet. For this reason, a fundamental reflection about the primacy of politics, the role of governmental communication, and the culture in the new social media landscape is necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Hyves can be seen as a Dutch variant of Facebook.

  2. 2.

    Dutch examples are the “Handreiking Ambtenaar 2.0” by the platform Ambtenaar 2.0, the “richtlijnen sociale media” by the province of Overijssel (Provincie Overijssel 2010), and the “richtlijnen gebruik sociale media” by the municipality of Heemstede (Gemeente Heemstede 2010).

  3. 3.

    The Oekaze Kok refers to the document “Indications external contacts national civil servants” (Aanwijzingen externe contacten rijksambtenaren in Dutch).

References

  • Anthopoulos LG, Siozos P, Tsoukalas IA (2007) Applying participatory design and collaboration in digital public services for discovering and re-designing e-government services. Gov Inf Q 24(2):353–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beer D, Burrows R (2007) Sociology and, of and in Web 2.0: some initial considerations. http://www.socresonline.org.uk/12/5/17.html

  • Bekkers VJJM, Homburg VMF (eds) (2005) The information ecology of E-government: E-government as institutional and technological innovation in public administration. IOS, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekkers VJJM, Edwards AR, Moody R, Beunders H (2011) Caught by surprise? Micro-mobilization, new media and the management of strategic surprises. Public Manag Rev 13(7):1003–1021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulos MN, Wheelert S (2007) The emerging Web 2.0 social software: an enabling suite of sociable technologies in health and health care education. Health Info Libr J 24:2–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovens MAP, ‘t Hart P, van Twist MJW, Rosenthal U (2001) Openbaar bestuur: beleid, organisatie en politiek, 6th edn. Kluwer, Alphen aan den Rijn

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr N (2005) The amorality of Web 2.0, Nicolas Carr’s Blog. http://www.roughtype.com/archives/2005/10/the_amorality_o.php

  • Chadwick A (2009) Web 2.0. New challenges for the study of e-democracy in an era of informational exuberance. I/S: J Law Policy Inf Soc 5:9–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Commissie ‘Project X’ Haren (2013) Twee werelden: you only live once (Commissie Cohen)

    Google Scholar 

  • de Kool D (2010) Ambtenaren en sociale media: een onderzoek naar de kansen en risico’s van online activiteiten voor ambtenaren. Center for Public Innovation, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • de Kool D, van Wamelen J (2008) De impact van Web 2.0 op de kennissamenleving. In: Alberts G (ed) Burger in uitvoering: Jaarboek KennisSamenleving. Aksant, Amsterdam, pp 288–305

    Google Scholar 

  • De Volkskrant (2009) Ambtenaar moet meepraten op internet, 5 December

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggers WD (2007) Government 2.0: using technology to improve education, cut red tape, reduce gridlock, and enhance democracy. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • Fensel D, Leiter B, Stavrakantonakis I (2012) Social media monitoring. Semantic Technology Institute, Innsbruck

    Google Scholar 

  • Frissen V et al (2008) Naar een ‘User Generated State’? De impact van nieuwe media voor overheid en openbaar bestuur. TNO, Delft

    Google Scholar 

  • Gemeente Heemstede (2010) Richtlijnen gebruik sociale media binnen de gemeente Heemstede. Heemstede

    Google Scholar 

  • Glascow K, Fink C (2013) From push brooms to prayer books: social media and social networks during the London riots. In: iConference 2013 proceedings, pp 155–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Hupe P (2007) Overheidsbeleid als politiek: over de grondslagen van beleid. Van Gorcum, Asseen

    Google Scholar 

  • Linders D (2012) From e-government to we-government: defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Gov Inf Q 29:446–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon D (2001) Surveillance society: monitoring everyday life. Open University Press, Buckingham

    Google Scholar 

  • Manyika J (2011) Big data: the next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity. McKinsey Global Institute, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministerie van Algemene Zaken (2009) Ondertussen…online. Hoe de overheid kan inspelen op het veranderende medialandschap. Rijksvoorlichtingsdienst, Den Haag

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministerie van Binnenlandse en Koninkrijksrelaties (2009a) Het nieuwe werken bij het rijk. Van de oude werken De dingen Die Voorbijgaan. Programma Vernieuwing Rijksdienst, Den Haag

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministerie van Binnenlandse en Koninkrijksrelaties (2009b) Handreiking Modelgedragscode Integriteit Sector Rijk. Bureau Integriteitsbevordering Openbare Sector, Den Haag

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly T (2007) What is Web 2.0: design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Commun Strateg 65:17–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascu C, Osimo D, Ulrich M, Torlea D, Burgelman JC (2007) The potential disruptive impact of Internet 2 based technologies. First Monday. Zie: www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue12_3/pascu/

  • Provincie Overijssel (2010) Richtlijnen Social Media. http://www.overijssel.nl/overijssel/huis-stijl-overijssel/richtlijnen-social/

  • Raad voor het Openbaar Bestuur (2010) Vertrouwen op democratie, Den Haag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddick CG, Aikins SK (eds) (2012) Web 2.0 technologies and democratic governance: political, policy and management implications. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz B (2004) Paradox of choices: why more is less. Reed, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith T (2009) The social media revolution. Int J Mark Res 51:559–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Social Embassy (2011) Social media monitor 4. Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Surowiecki J (2004) The wisdom of crowds: why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies, and nations. Doubleday, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘t Hart P et al (2002) Politiek-ambtelijke verhoudingen in beweging. Boom, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • van Noort G, Willemsen LM (2011) Online damage control: the effects of proactive versus reactive webcare interventions in consumer-generated and brand-generated platforms. J Interact Mark 26:131–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voorlichtingsraad (2010) Uitgangspunten online communicatie rijksambtenaren. Ministerie van Algemene Zaken, Den Haag

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyld DC (2007) The blogging revolution: government in the age of Web 2.0. In: E-Government Series. IBM Center for The Business of Government, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Yiu C (2012) The big data opportunity: making government faster, smarter and more personal. Policy Exchange (report), London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dennis de Kool Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

de Kool, D. (2014). The Use of Social Media in the Public Sector: Some Lessons from the Netherlands. In: Rodríguez-Bolívar, M. (eds) Measuring E-government Efficiency. Public Administration and Information Technology, vol 5. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9982-4_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics