Abstract
Under the label of E-government, governments are undertaking different activities that are directly related to the development of the modern information society. In this chapter, we will focus on a specific communicative challenge of E-government, namely, the use of social media tools by civil servants. Social media are rapidly penetrating the modern information society. This new generation of digital applications emphasizes the importance of user-participation, content-sharing, and accessible communication. Both companies and governmental agencies are exploring carefully the possibilities of social media to communicate with customers or citizens. An important reason is the assumption that the use of social media can result in governments that operate more effectively and efficiently. However, for civil servants the utilization of social media brings both challenges and risks. This chapter analyzes the challenges, risks, and dilemmas of social media for Dutch civil servants. The theoretical framework that is used consists of a “classical” and a “modern” approach to civil servants. In the classical “Weberian” model, politicians are responsible for policy making (and communication about it) and civil servants have to implement policies (“the primacy of politics”). This “principal” approach implies a limited role of civil servants in the virtual world of social media. On the other hand, the “modern” approach to civil servants highlights the professional expertise and distinctive responsibilities of civil servants. The “pragmatic” approach leaves more space for active participation of civil servants on the Internet. For this reason, a fundamental reflection about the primacy of politics, the role of governmental communication, and the culture in the new social media landscape is necessary.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Hyves can be seen as a Dutch variant of Facebook.
- 2.
- 3.
The Oekaze Kok refers to the document “Indications external contacts national civil servants” (Aanwijzingen externe contacten rijksambtenaren in Dutch).
References
Anthopoulos LG, Siozos P, Tsoukalas IA (2007) Applying participatory design and collaboration in digital public services for discovering and re-designing e-government services. Gov Inf Q 24(2):353–376
Beer D, Burrows R (2007) Sociology and, of and in Web 2.0: some initial considerations. http://www.socresonline.org.uk/12/5/17.html
Bekkers VJJM, Homburg VMF (eds) (2005) The information ecology of E-government: E-government as institutional and technological innovation in public administration. IOS, Amsterdam
Bekkers VJJM, Edwards AR, Moody R, Beunders H (2011) Caught by surprise? Micro-mobilization, new media and the management of strategic surprises. Public Manag Rev 13(7):1003–1021
Boulos MN, Wheelert S (2007) The emerging Web 2.0 social software: an enabling suite of sociable technologies in health and health care education. Health Info Libr J 24:2–23
Bovens MAP, ‘t Hart P, van Twist MJW, Rosenthal U (2001) Openbaar bestuur: beleid, organisatie en politiek, 6th edn. Kluwer, Alphen aan den Rijn
Carr N (2005) The amorality of Web 2.0, Nicolas Carr’s Blog. http://www.roughtype.com/archives/2005/10/the_amorality_o.php
Chadwick A (2009) Web 2.0. New challenges for the study of e-democracy in an era of informational exuberance. I/S: J Law Policy Inf Soc 5:9–41
Commissie ‘Project X’ Haren (2013) Twee werelden: you only live once (Commissie Cohen)
de Kool D (2010) Ambtenaren en sociale media: een onderzoek naar de kansen en risico’s van online activiteiten voor ambtenaren. Center for Public Innovation, Rotterdam
de Kool D, van Wamelen J (2008) De impact van Web 2.0 op de kennissamenleving. In: Alberts G (ed) Burger in uitvoering: Jaarboek KennisSamenleving. Aksant, Amsterdam, pp 288–305
De Volkskrant (2009) Ambtenaar moet meepraten op internet, 5 December
Eggers WD (2007) Government 2.0: using technology to improve education, cut red tape, reduce gridlock, and enhance democracy. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD
Fensel D, Leiter B, Stavrakantonakis I (2012) Social media monitoring. Semantic Technology Institute, Innsbruck
Frissen V et al (2008) Naar een ‘User Generated State’? De impact van nieuwe media voor overheid en openbaar bestuur. TNO, Delft
Gemeente Heemstede (2010) Richtlijnen gebruik sociale media binnen de gemeente Heemstede. Heemstede
Glascow K, Fink C (2013) From push brooms to prayer books: social media and social networks during the London riots. In: iConference 2013 proceedings, pp 155–169
Hupe P (2007) Overheidsbeleid als politiek: over de grondslagen van beleid. Van Gorcum, Asseen
Linders D (2012) From e-government to we-government: defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Gov Inf Q 29:446–454
Lyon D (2001) Surveillance society: monitoring everyday life. Open University Press, Buckingham
Manyika J (2011) Big data: the next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity. McKinsey Global Institute, San Francisco
Ministerie van Algemene Zaken (2009) Ondertussen…online. Hoe de overheid kan inspelen op het veranderende medialandschap. Rijksvoorlichtingsdienst, Den Haag
Ministerie van Binnenlandse en Koninkrijksrelaties (2009a) Het nieuwe werken bij het rijk. Van de oude werken De dingen Die Voorbijgaan. Programma Vernieuwing Rijksdienst, Den Haag
Ministerie van Binnenlandse en Koninkrijksrelaties (2009b) Handreiking Modelgedragscode Integriteit Sector Rijk. Bureau Integriteitsbevordering Openbare Sector, Den Haag
O’Reilly T (2007) What is Web 2.0: design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Commun Strateg 65:17–37
Pascu C, Osimo D, Ulrich M, Torlea D, Burgelman JC (2007) The potential disruptive impact of Internet 2 based technologies. First Monday. Zie: www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue12_3/pascu/
Provincie Overijssel (2010) Richtlijnen Social Media. http://www.overijssel.nl/overijssel/huis-stijl-overijssel/richtlijnen-social/
Raad voor het Openbaar Bestuur (2010) Vertrouwen op democratie, Den Haag.
Reddick CG, Aikins SK (eds) (2012) Web 2.0 technologies and democratic governance: political, policy and management implications. Springer, New York
Schwartz B (2004) Paradox of choices: why more is less. Reed, New York
Smith T (2009) The social media revolution. Int J Mark Res 51:559–561
Social Embassy (2011) Social media monitor 4. Amsterdam
Surowiecki J (2004) The wisdom of crowds: why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies, and nations. Doubleday, New York
‘t Hart P et al (2002) Politiek-ambtelijke verhoudingen in beweging. Boom, Amsterdam
van Noort G, Willemsen LM (2011) Online damage control: the effects of proactive versus reactive webcare interventions in consumer-generated and brand-generated platforms. J Interact Mark 26:131–140
Voorlichtingsraad (2010) Uitgangspunten online communicatie rijksambtenaren. Ministerie van Algemene Zaken, Den Haag
Wyld DC (2007) The blogging revolution: government in the age of Web 2.0. In: E-Government Series. IBM Center for The Business of Government, Washington
Yiu C (2012) The big data opportunity: making government faster, smarter and more personal. Policy Exchange (report), London
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
de Kool, D. (2014). The Use of Social Media in the Public Sector: Some Lessons from the Netherlands. In: Rodríguez-Bolívar, M. (eds) Measuring E-government Efficiency. Public Administration and Information Technology, vol 5. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9982-4_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9982-4_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-9981-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-9982-4
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)