Skip to main content

Public Managers’ Perceptions of e-Government Efficiency: A Case Study of Andalusian Municipalities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Measuring E-government Efficiency

Abstract

In Spain, various plans to develop the use of ICT have been implemented in order to facilitate procedures related to public services, to promote economic transparency and to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of public administration. Nonetheless, some recent studies have shown that the development and implementation of e-government in Spanish municipalities has taken place very irregularly. Research has provided an external view of the implementation of these initiatives, but to date little is known about the opinions of the people directly involved in their introduction and development. This chapter examines public managers’ perceptions of e-government efficiency, determined by means of a survey in this respect addressed to public managers in municipal governments in Andalusia. The results inform us of the perceptions of municipal IT managers in this area of Spain and show how the heterogeneity of their views is accounted for by socio-demographic variables and by political factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bekkers V, Homburg V (2007) The myths of e-Government: looking beyond the assumptions of a new and better government. Inform Soc 23(5):373–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belanger F, Hiller JS (2006) A framework for e-government: privacy implications. Bus Process Manage J 12(1):48–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beynon-Davies P, Williams MD (2003) Evaluating electronic local government in the UK. J Inf Technol 18(2):137–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caba C, Rodríguez MP, López AM (2008) E-government process and incentives for online public financial information. Online Inform Rev 32:379–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calista DJ, Melitski J (2007) E-government and E-governance: converging constructs of public sector information and communication technologies. Public Adm Q 31(1/2):87–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Cárcaba A, García J (2008) Factors behind the disclosure of accounting information online on behalf of local governments. Rev Esp Financ Contab 137:63–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan CML, Pan SL, Tan CW (2003) Managing stakeholder relationships in an e-Government project. Proceedings of the 9th Americas conference on information systems, Tampa

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan HS, Chow KW (2007) Public management policy and practice in western China: metapolicy, tacit knowledge, and implications for management innovation transfer. Am Rev Public Adm 37:479–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhuri A, Flamm KS, Horrigan J (2005) An analysis of the determinants of internet access. Telecomm Pol 29(9/10):731–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrova DV, Chen YC (2006) Profiling the adopters of e-Government information and services. The influence of psychological characteristics, civic mindedness, and information channels. Soc Sci Comput Rev 24(2):172–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunleavy P, Margetts H, Bastow S, Tinkler J (2006) New public management is dead-long live digital-era governance. J Public Adm Res Theor 16:467–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebbers WE, Van Dijk JAGM (2007) Resistance and support to electronic government, building a model of innovation. Govern Inform Q 24(3):554–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmiston KD (2002) State and local e-government. Prospects and challenges. Am Rev Public Adm 33(1):20–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feeney MK, Welch EW (2012) Electronic participation technologies and perceived outcomes for local government managers. Public Manage Rev 14(6):815–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flak LS, Rose J (2005) Stakeholder governance: adapting stakeholder theory to the e-government field. Comm Assoc Inform Syst 16(31):1–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganapati S, Reddick CG (2012) Open e-government in U.S. state governments: survey evidence from chief information officers. Govern Inform Q 29:115–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gandía JL, Archidona MC (2008) Determinants of web site information by Spanish city councils. Online Inform Rev 32(1):35–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garson GD (2006) Public information technology and e-governance: managing the virtual state. Jones and Bartlett, Sudbury, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong W, Li ZG, Stump RL (2007) Global Internet use and access: cultural considerations. Asia Pac J Market Logist 19(1):57–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart-Teeter (2003) The new e-Government equation: ease, engagement, privacy and protection. Council for Excellence in Government, Washington D C. http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0304&L=do-wire&P=845

    Google Scholar 

  • Heeks R (2003) Most e-government for development projects fail: how can the risk be reduced? IDPM, Manchester

    Google Scholar 

  • Heeks R (2006) Understanding and measuring eGovernment: international benchmarking studies. In: Presented at the UDESA workshop, E-Participation and E-Government: understanding the present and creating the future, Budapest, Hungary

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho AT (2002) Reinventing local governments and the e-Government initiative. Public Adm Rev 62(4):410–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho AT, Smith JF (2001) Information technology planning and the Y2K problem in local governments. Am Rev Public Adm 31(2):158–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holden SH, Norris DF, Fletcher PD (2003) Electronic government at the local level: process to date and future issues. Public Perform Manage Rev 26(4):325–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irani Z, Elliman T, Jackson P (2007) Electronic transformation of government in the UK: a research agenda. Eur J Inform Syst 16:327–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Justice JB, Melitski J, Smith L (2006) E-government as an instrument of fiscal accountability and responsiveness. Do the best practitioners employ the best practices? Am Rev Public Adm 36:301–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamal MM, Weerakkody V, Jones S (2009) The case of enterprise application integration in facilitating e-Government services in a Welsh authority. Int J Inform Manage 29(2):161–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamal M, Weerakkody V, Irani Z (2011) Analyzing the role of stakeholders in the adoption of technology interaction solutions in UK local government: an exploratory study. Govern Inform Q 28:200–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kickert W (1997) Public management reforms in countries with a Napoleonic state model: France, Italy and Spain. In: Pollitt C, Van Thiel S, Homburg W (eds) New public management in Europe: adaptations and alternatives. Palgrave/Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp 26–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim CK (2007) A cross-national analysis of global e-Government. Public Org Rev 7:317–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim S, Lee J (2012) E-participation, transparency, and trust in local government. Public Adm Rev 72(6):819–828

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosaker A, Lee-Kelley L (2006) Citizen-centric e-government: a critique of the UK model. Electron Gov 32(2):127–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam W (2005) Barriers to e-Government integration. J Enterprise Inform Manage 18(5):511–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laswad F, Fisher R, Oyelere P (2005) Determinants of voluntary internet financial reporting by local government authorities. J Account Publ Pol 24:101–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee-Kelley L, Kolsaker A (2004) The reluctant Hong Kong consumer: purchasing travel online. Int J Consum Stud 28(3):295–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom C (1959) The science of “muddling through”. Public Adm Rev 19(2):79–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindgren I, Jansson G (2013) Electronic services in the public sector: a conceptual framework. Govern Inform Q 30(2):163–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lodge M, Hood C (2012) Into an age of multiple austerities? Public management and public service bargains across OECD countries. Governance 25(1):79–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meier A (2013) Understanding the complex dynamics of transparency. Public Adm Rev 73(3):429–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millard J (2008) eGovernment measurement for policy makers. Euro J ePract 4. www.epracticejournal.eu

  • Moon M, Norris DF (2005) Does managerial orientation matter? The adoption of reinventing government and e-government at the municipal level. Inform Syst J 15(1):43–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon MJ (2002) The evolution of e-government among municipalities: rhetoric or reality? Public Adm Rev 62(4):424–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon MJ (2005) E-procurement management in state governments: diffusion of e-procurement practices and its determinants. J Public Procurement 5(1):54–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Mossberger KC, Tolbert J, Gilbert M (2004) Race, place and information technology. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, September, 2–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz A, Hípola P (2011) Electronic administration in Spain: from its beginnings to the present. Govern Inform Q 28:74–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musso J, Weare C, Hale M (2000) Designing web technologies for local governance reform. Good management and good democracy. Polit Commun 17:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasi G, Frosini F (2010) Vision and practice of e-government: an empirical study. Financ Account Manage 26(1):95–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Ni AY, Bretschneider S (2007) The decision to contract out: a study of contracting for e-Government services in state governments. Public Adm Rev 67(3):531–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris DF, Moon MJ (2005) Advancing e-Government at the grassroots: tortoise or hare? Public Adm Rev 65(1):64–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris DF, Reddick CG (2013) Local e-Government in the United States: transformation or incremental change? Public Adm Rev 73(1):165–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nutt PC, Backo RW (1992) The strategic management of public and third sector organizations. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Official State Gazette No. 150. Ley 11/2007, de 22 de junio, de acceso electrónico de los ciudadanos a los Servicios Públicos. Available at: http://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2007/06/23/pdfs/A27150-27166.pdf

  • Orange G, Burke A, Elliman T, Kor AL (2006) CARE: an integrated framework to support continuous, adaptable, reflective evaluation of e-government systems: a research note in presented at European and Mediterranean Conference Information Systems, Alicante, Spain

    Google Scholar 

  • Pardo TA, Nam T, Burke B (2012) E-Government interoperability: interaction of policy, management, and technology dimensions. Soc Sci Comput Rev 30(1):7–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paris M (2005) Local E-Government and devolution: electronic service delivery in Northern Ireland. Local Govern Stud 31(3):307–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pina V, Torres L, Royo S (2011) Is e-Government promoting convergence towards more accountable local governments? Int Public Manage J 13(4):350–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt C, Bouckaert G (2004) Public management reforms: a comparative analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddick CG, Frank HA (2007a) E-Government and its influence on managerial effectiveness: a survey of Florida and Texas city managers. Financ Account Manage 23(1):1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddick CG, Frank HA (2007b) The perceived impact of e-government on U.S. cities: a survey of Florida and Texas City managers. Govern Inform Q 24:576–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddick CG (2004) The growth of e-procurement in American state governments: a model and empirical evidence. J Publ Procurement 4(2):151–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddick CG (2005) Citizen interaction with e-government: from the streets to servers? Govern Inform Q 22:38–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddick CG (2009) Factors that explain the perceived effectiveness of e-Government: a survey of United States city government information technology directors. Int J Electron Govern Res 5(2):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddick CG, Turner M (2012) Channel choice and public service delivery in Canada: comparing e-government to traditional service delivery. Govern Inform Q 29(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez MP, Caba MC, López AM (2006) Cultural contexts and governmental digital reporting. Int Rev Adm Sci 72(2):269–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez L, Garcia IS, Gallego I (2011) Determining factors of e-Government development: a worldwide national approach. Int Public Manage J 14(2):218–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez MP, Caba C, López AM (2007) E-Government and public financial reporting. The case of Spanish regional governments. Am Rev Public Admin 37(2):142–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowley J (2011) e-Government stakeholders—who are they and what do they want? Int J Inform Manage 31:53–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruano JM (2013) E-government strategies in Spanish local governments. Local Govern Stud. doi:10.1080/03003930.2013.787414

    Google Scholar 

  • Serrano C, Rueda M, Portillo P (2009) Factors influencing e-disclosure in local public administrations. Environ Plan C 27(2):355–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siau K, Long Y (2009) Factors impacting e-Government development. J Comput Inform Syst (Fall)98–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Spanish Government (2013) Planes específicos de la Agenda digital para España. http://www.agendadigital.gob.es/planes-actuaciones/Bibliotecaplanesconsolidados/Planes-Especificos-ADpE.pdf

  • Streib G, Navarro I (2005) Citizen demand for interactive e-Government: the case of Georgia consumer services. Am Rev Public Admin 36(3):288–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Styles A, Tennyson M (2007) The accessibility of financial reporting of U. S. municipalities on the Internet. J Publ Budget Account Financ Manage 19(1):56–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan CW, Pan SL, Lim ETK (2005) Managing stakeholder interest in e-government implementation: lessons learned from a Singapore e-Government project. J Global Inform Manage 13(1):31–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JC, Streib G (2003) The new face of government: citizen-initiated contact in the era of e-Government. J Public Admin Res Theory 13(1):93–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolbert CJ, Mossberger K, McNeal R (2008) Institutions, policy and e-Government in the American states. Public Adm Rev 68:549–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk JAGM, Peters O, Ebbers W (2008) Explaining the acceptance and use of government Internet services: a multivariate analysis of 2006 survey data in the Netherlands. Govern Inform Q 25(3):379–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weare C, Musso J, Hale M (1999) Electronic democracy and the diffusion of municipal Web pages in California. Adm Soc 31:3–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch EW, Hinnant CC, Moon MJ (2004) Linking citizen satisfaction with e-government and trust in government. J Public Adm Res Theor 15(3):371–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch EW, Hinnant CC, Moon MJ (2005) Linking citizen satisfaction with e-government and trust in government. J Public Adm Res Theory 15:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West D (2001) State and Federal e-Government in the United States 2001. http://www.insidepolitics.org/egovt01us.html

  • West DM (2004) E-government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes. Public Adm Rev 64(1):15–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu H (2012) Information technology, public administration and citizen participation: the impacts of e-government on political and administrative processes. Public Adm Rev 72(6):915–920

    Google Scholar 

  • Yildiz M (2007) E-government research: reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward. Govern Inform Q 24(3):646–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was carried out with financial support from the Regional Government of Andalusia (Spain), the Department of Innovation, Science and Enterprise (Research Projects P10-SEJ-06628 and P11-SEJ-7700) and the Spanish National R&D Plan through research project ECO2010-20522 (ECON-FEDER) (Ministry of Science and Innovation).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Alcaide-Muñoz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Alcaide-Muñoz, L., Hernández, A.M.L., Caba-Pérez, C. (2014). Public Managers’ Perceptions of e-Government Efficiency: A Case Study of Andalusian Municipalities. In: Rodríguez-Bolívar, M. (eds) Measuring E-government Efficiency. Public Administration and Information Technology, vol 5. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9982-4_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics