Abstract
This chapter challenges existing impact assessments of open data in the public sector for three reasons: (1) the exclusive focus on economic effects of open data and not on other desirables such as a clean environment, good education, equitable health care, etc.; (2) the assumed linear relation between open data and impacts that ignores the dynamics of the interactions between the various stakeholders that may result in unpredictable and unforeseeable outcomes; (3) the homogeneous perspective on open data in the public sector that fails to acknowledge the variation of open data incentives, practices and consequences between countries and business sectors. As an alternative to “naive impact assessments,” this chapter develops an approach that embraces the complexity and contextuality of societal dynamics and takes a variety of values and desirables into account. We argue that whether open data delivers its “promise” depends on specific, local interactions that can be managed and controlled to a limited extent. Open data and its uses should be studied as social constructions that emerge over time in a specific context. We use two cases—open data in public transportation and in policing—to show the use of our perspective. For policy makers the complexity, contextuality, and multi-value approach means that they should shift their focus from working on “grand open data designs” to facilitating and promoting smart, local, pluralistic approaches to open data.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aichholzer, G., & Burkert, H. (Eds.) (2004). Public sector information in an information age: Between markets, public management and citizens’ rights. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Bentham, J. (1791). Essay on political tactics. London: T. Payne.
de Hoog, J., van Twist, M., Meijer, A., van der Steen, M., & Scherpenisse, J. (2012). Open data, open gevolgen. Den Haag: NSOB.
Erkkilä, T. (2012). Government transparency. Impacts and unintended consequences. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ganapati, S., & Reddick, C. G. (2012). Open e-government in U.S. state governments: Survey evidence from chief information officers. Government Information Quarterly, 29(2), 115–122.
Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G. (2012). Transparency and trust. An experimental study of online disclosure and trust in government. PhD Thesis. Utrecht: Utrecht University.
Harrison, T. M., Pardo, T. A., & Cook, M. (2012a). Creating open government ecosystems: A research and development agenda. Future Internet, 4, 900–928.
Harrison, T. M., Guerrero, S., Burke, G. B., Cook, M., Cresswell, A., Helbig, N., Hrdinova, J., & Pardo, T. (2012b). Open government and e-government: Democratic challenges from a public value perspective. Information Polity, 17, 83–97.
Janssen, K. (2011). The influence of the PSI directive on open government data: An overview of recent developments. Government Information Quarterly,28(4), 446–456.
Janssen, K., & Dumortier, J. (2003). Towards a european framework for the re-use of public sector information: A long and winding road. International Journal of Law and Information Technology,11(2), 184–201.
Koppenjan, J., & Klijn, E. (2004). Managing uncertainties in networks. Londen: Routledge.
Kroes, N. (2011).Unlocking the goldmine: New legal proposals to open up Europe’s public sector. Weblog 12 december. blogs.ec.europa.eu/neelie-kroes/opendata/.
Kronenburg, T., Monasso, T., Boschker, E., & Thaens, M. (2012). De waarde van open data. Keuzes en effecten van open-datastrategieën voor publieke organisaties. Den Haag: Zenc.
Lathrop, D., & Ruma, L. (Eds.) (2010). Open government: Collaboration, transparency and participation in practice. Beijing: O’Reilly.
Luna-Reyes, L. F., & Chun, S. A. (2012). Open government and public participation: Issues and challenges in creating public value. Information Polity, 17, 77–81.
McDermott, P. (2010). Building open government. Government Information Quarterly, 27, 401–413.
Meijer, A. J. (2007). Publishing public performance results on the internet. Do stakeholders use the internet to hold dutch public service organizations to account? Government Information Quarterly, 24, 165–185.
Meijer, A. (2009). Understanding modern transparency. International Review of the Administrative Sciences, 75, 255–269.
Meijer, A. J. (2013a). Understanding the complex dynamics of transparency. Public Administration Review, 73, 429–439.
Meijer, A. J. (2013b). Transparency. In M. Bovens, R.E. Goodin, & T. Schillemans (Eds.), Oxford Handbook Of Public Accountability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nardi, B. A., & O’Day, V. L. (1999). Information ecologies: Using technology with heart, MIT Press Cambridge (MA).
Newbery, D., Bently, L., & Pollock, R. (2008). Models of public sector information provision via trading funds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Noveck, B. S. (2009). Wiki government. How technology can make government better, democracy stronger, and citizens more powerful. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.
Perritt, H. H. (1997). Open government. Government Information Quarterly, 14(4), 397–406.
Roberts, A. (2006). Blacked out. Government secrecy in the information age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Teisman, G. (2000). Models for research into decision-making processes: On phases, streams and decision-making rounds. Public Administration, 78(4), 937–956.
Teisman, G. R., & Klijn, E. H. (2008). Complexity theory and public management. Public Management Review, 10(3), 287–297.
van Gunsteren, H. (2006). Vertrouwen in democractie. Over de principes van zelforganisatie. Amsterdam: Van Gennep.
Veenswijk, M., Koerten, H., & Poot, J. (2012). Unravelling Organizational Consequences of PSI Reform: An In-depth Study of the Organizational Impact of the Reuse of Public Sector Data. ETLA Working Paper 1275. https://www.etla.fi/en/publications/dp1275-en/.
Vickery, G. (2011). Review of recent studies on PSI-Use and related market developments. Paris: Information Economics.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Meijer, A., de Hoog, J., van Twist, M., van der Steen, M., Scherpenisse, J. (2014). Understanding the Dynamics of Open Data: From Sweeping Statements to Complex Contextual Interactions. In: Gascó-Hernández, M. (eds) Open Government. Public Administration and Information Technology, vol 4. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9563-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9563-5_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-9562-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-9563-5
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)