Abstract
Web 2.0 and social media is purported to be a driver of citizen engagement and participative capacities. However, there are tensions between these open networked technologies, and traditional democratic and administrative governance systems. These tensions create a set of tensions between communications and engagement stemming from the deployment of Web 2.0 and social media technologies. This chapter examines social media trends and usage at the local level in the Canadian province of Nova Scotia. Studying both administrative and electoral usage in the autumn of 2012, we found that social media platforms are still new for municipalities and local politicians in the province with only half of municipalities and half of the politicians in the two major urban centers using social media. Moreover, they used social media primarily as a means toward one-way information sharing and communicating. As Web 2.0 technologies continue to proliferate, and as governments continue to experiment, a more open, outward and interactive public sector, both administratively and democratically, is needed in order to foster capacities for genuine engagement.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In our reporting below, we have tried to verify the ongoing existence of relevant social media pages as per the noted address, though some pages may have been altered since they no longer appear. As noted in our chapter, this is particularly prevalent with respect to candidates during and after the election period.
References
Association of Local Government Information Management Inc. (2009). A Roadmap to E-democracy in New Zealand local government. ALGIM E-Democracy Research Paper: http://www.algim.org.nz/Documents/Whitepapers/ALGIM%20Edemocracy%20Whitepaper%20FINAL.pdf.
Bonsón, E., Torres, L., Royo, S., & Flores, F. (2012). Local e-government 2.0: Social media and corporate transparency in municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 29(2), 123–132. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2011.10.001.
City of Calgary. (n.d). Business plans and budgets 2012-2014: Overview & citizen summary. http://www.calgary.ca/CA/fs/Pages/Plans-Budgets-and-Financial-Reports/Business-Plans-and-Budgets-2012-2014/Business-Plans-and-Budgets-2012-2014-Overview.aspx.
Clarke, A. (2010). Social Media: 4. Political uses and implications for representative democracy. Library of Parliament. http://www.parl.gc.ca/Content/LOP/ResearchPublications/2010-10-e.htm.
Embaye, H., Navratil, P., Ng, D., & Yang, S. (n.d.). Social Media Primer for Municipal Governments. http://www.lgma.ca/assets/Misc/Social-Media-Primer-Research-Paper.pdf.
Fyfe, T., & Crookall, P. (2010). Social Media and Public Sector Policy Dilemmas. Toronto: Institute of Public Administration of Canada: Toronto. http://ipac.ca/documents/correction-June10.pdf.
Good Neighbours, Great Neighbourhoods. (n.d). In Facebook [Fan Page]. https://www.facebook.com/PlanHRM. Accessed 2 March 2013.
Halifax Regional Municipality. (n.d). Social media. http://www.halifax.ca/socialmedia/.
Hand, L., & Ching, B. (2011). “You have one friend request”: An exploration of power and citizen engagement in local governments’ use of social media. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 33(3), 362–382. doi:10.2753/ATP1084-1806330303.
Huijboom, N., van den Broek, T., Frissen, V., Kool, L., Kotterink, B., Nielsen, M., & Millard, J. (2009). Public Services 2.0: The Impact of Social Computing on Public Services. Brussels: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities http://ftp.jrc.es/EURdoc/JRC54203.pdf.
International Association for Public Participation. (2007). IAP2 Spectrum of Public Participation. http://www.iap2.org/associations/4748/files/spectrum.pdf.
Klang, M., & Nolin, J. (2011). Disciplining social media: An analysis of social media policies in 26 Swedish municipalities. First Monday, 16(8) pp. 1–24.
Lee, G., & Kwak, Y. (2011). An open government implementation model: Moving to increased public engagement. IBM center for the business of government. http://www.businessofgovernment.org/sites/default/files/An%20Open%20Government%20Implementation%20Model.pdf.
Maier-Rabler, U., & Huber, S. (2011). “Open”: The changing relation between citizens, public administration, and political authority. eJournal of eDemocracy & Open Government, 3(2), 182–191.
Morison, J. (2010). Gov 2.0: Towards a user generated state? The Modern Law Review, 73(4), 551–577. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.2010.00808.x.
Mossberger, K., & Wu, Y. (2012). Civic engagement and local e-government: Social networking comes of age. Institute for Policy & Civic Engagement, University of Illinois at Chicago: http://www.uic.edu/cuppa/ipce/interior/CELocalEGovSMFullReport2012.pdf.
Mota, J., & Santinha, G. (2012, July 16). Social media and civic engagement: Discussing the case of Aveiro, Portugal. European Journal of ePractice. http://www.epractice.eu/en/document/5377051.
Nova Scotia Community Counts. (2011). Population by 5 year age groups. http://www.gov.ns.ca/finance/communitycounts/topicview.asp?tnum=51&gval=mun&s=Demographics&yval=2011&vval=&vval1=Total&vval2=Number&vval3=.
OECD. (2009). Focus on citizens: Public engagement for better policy and services. OECD Publishing.
Roy, J. (2012, May 7). The rise of municipal government 2.0. Canadian Government Executive, 17(3). http://www.cangovexec.net/category/item/227.html.
Roy, J. (2013). From machinery to mobility: Government and democracy in a participative age. New York: Springer.
Sandoval-Almazan, R., & Gil-Garcia, J. (2012). Are government internet portals evolving towards more interaction, participation, and collaboration? Revisiting the rhetoric of e-government among municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 29(1), S72–S81. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2011.09.004.
Serrat, O. (2010). Social media and the public sector. Knowledge solutions. International Publications, Cornell University ILR School: Ithaca, NY http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1191&context=intl.
Tapscott, D., Williams, A., & Herman, D. (2008). Government 2.0: Transforming government and governance for the twenty-first century. nGenera Corporation.
Thomas, R. (2012, February 3). Participatory budgeting in Canadian municipalities?. http://www.renthomas.ca/urban-planning/participatory-budgeting-in-canadian-municipalities.
Transit Cooperative Research Program. (2012). TCRP synthesis 99: Uses of social media in public transportation. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/tcrp/tcrp_syn_99.pdf.
Weeks, W. (2012, December). Spotlight on Social Media. Municipal World, Union, Ontario: www.municipalworld.com http://elevenpr.squarespace.com/storage/Spotlight%20on%20Social%20Media%20-%20Municipal%20World%20Magazine.pdf.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Riarh, K., Roy, J. (2014). The Impacts of Social Media on Government and Democracy: An Examination of Municipal Usage in Nova Scotia, Canada. In: Gascó-Hernández, M. (eds) Open Government. Public Administration and Information Technology, vol 4. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9563-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9563-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-9562-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-9563-5
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)