Biomass Harvesting Systems and Analysis

  • Jingxin Wang
  • Damon Hartley
  • Weiguo Liu


Harvesting of trees or woody biomass, for the production of lumber, for production of paper, or as a feedstock for bioenergy, is accomplished through the integrated activities of a number of people and machines. The integration of equipment designed to perform disparate tasks forms what is referred to as a harvest system. In the harvest system, each task is performed in concert with the goals of the subsequent tasks, the overall objective being to prepare the raw material for transport to the processing facility.


Supply Chain Global Position System Woody Biomass Forest Residue Biomass Harvest 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Abrahamson L, Volk T, Castellano P, Foster C, Posselius J (2010) Development of a harvesting system for short rotation willow and hybrid poplar biomass crops. SRWCOWG, Syracuse, NY, October 18, 2010Google Scholar
  2. Becker DR, Abbas D, Halvorsen KE, Jakes PJ, McCaffrey SM, Moseley C (2009) Conventional wisdoms of woody biomass utilization. Accessed 18 May 2010
  3. Bowe SA, Bumgardner MS (2006) Small-diameter timber utilization in Wisconsin: a case study of four counties. N J Appl Forest 23(4):250–256Google Scholar
  4. Brinker RW, Kinard J, Rummer B, Lanford B (2002) Machine rate for selected forest harvesting machines. Alabama Agricultural Experimental Station, circular 296, p 12Google Scholar
  5. Buchholz T, Volk T (2011) Improving the profitability of willow crops—identifying opportunities with a crop budget model. Bioenergy Res 4:85–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De La Torre Ugarte D, Ray D (2000) Biomass and bioenergy applications of the POLYSYS modeling framework. Biomass Bioenergy 18:291–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dykstra D (2004) RILSIM 2.0 user’s guide: software for financial analysis of reduced-impact logging systems. Published as a contribution to the Asia-Pacific Forestry Commission, Blue Ox Forestry, Portland, OR, p 120Google Scholar
  8. Greene WD, Lanford BL (1996) Logging cost analysis. Short course manual. Georgia Center for Continuing Education, Athens, GA, p 78Google Scholar
  9. Greene WD, Lanford B (2001) Logging cost analysis. The University of Georgia, Georgia Center for continuing education and Daniel B. Warnell School of Forest Resources. Rural Development Center, Tifton, GeorgiaGoogle Scholar
  10. Greene WD, Reisinger TW (1999) Harvesting and roads. Timber harvesting teaching packet. The University of Georgia, Athens, GAGoogle Scholar
  11. Grushecky S, Wang J, McGill D (2007) Influence of site characteristics and costs of trucking and extraction on log residue utilization in southern West Virginia. Forest Prod J 57(7/8):63–67Google Scholar
  12. Han HS, Harry WL, Johnson LR (2004) Economic feasibility of an integrated harvesting system for small-diameter trees in southwest Idaho. Forest Prod J 54(2):21–27Google Scholar
  13. Hartsough B, Yomogida D, Stokes B (1996) Harvesting systems for short rotation woody crops. First conference of the short rotation woody crops working group, Paducah, KY, September 23–25, 1996Google Scholar
  14. Hartsough B, Drews E, McNeel J, Durston T, Stokes B (1997) Comparison of mechanized systems for thinning ponderosa pine and mixed conifer stands. Forest Prod J 47(11/12):59–68Google Scholar
  15. Hendricks GL (1986) A user’s manual for the harvesting analyzer: a microcomputer-based program for loggers. Division of Land and Economic Resources, Tennessee Valley Authority, Norris, TN, p 72Google Scholar
  16. Howard A (1989) A sequential approach to sampling design for time studies of cable yarding operations. Can J Forest Res 19:973–980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Howard A, Gasson R (1991) A system for computer-based design and implementation of time studies. Forest Prod J 41(7/8):53–55Google Scholar
  18. Jackson B, Schroeder R, Ashton S, Taylor E (2010) Chip-ping woody biomass. Accessed 12 May 2010
  19. Jensen K, Menard J, English B, Park W, Wilson B (2002) The wood transportation and resource analysis system (WTRANS): an analysis tool to assist wood residue producers and users. Forest Prod J 52(5):27–33Google Scholar
  20. Jeuck J, Duncan D (2009) Economics of harvesting woodybiomass in North Carolina. Accessed 19 May 2010
  21. Johansson J, Liss J, Gullberg T, Björhedenc R (2006) Trans- port and handling of forest energy bundles—advantages and problems. Biomass Bioenergy 30(4):334–341. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2005.07.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kingsley E (2011) Understanding biomass supply and demand. Northeast wood energy short course. November 8, 2011. State College, PA. Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA (presentation). Accessed 11 April 2013
  23. Li Y (2005) Modeling operational forestry problems in central Appalachian hardwood forests. Dissertation, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, p 144Google Scholar
  24. Li Y, Wang J, Miller G, McNeel J (2006) Production economics of harvesting small-diameter hardwood stands in central Appalachia. Forest Prod J 56(3):81–86Google Scholar
  25. Matthews DM (1942) Cost control in the logging industry. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, NY, p 374Google Scholar
  26. McDonald T (1999) Time study of harvesting equipment using GPS-derived positional data. In: Proceedings of forestry engineering for tomorrow. Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, Scotland, June 28–30, 1999Google Scholar
  27. McDonald T, Rummer B (2000) Automating time study of feller-buncher. In: Proceedings of the 23rd annual meeting of council on forest engineering, Kelowna, Canada, September 11–14, 2000Google Scholar
  28. Missouri Forest Products Association (2010) Woody biomass technology—demonstration project. http://MFPA%20woody%20biomass%20community%20demonstration%20report.pdf. Accessed 19 May 2010Google Scholar
  29. Miyata ES (1980) Determining fixed and operating costs of logging equipment. US For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-55. p 16Google Scholar
  30. Miyata ES, Steinlulb HM (1981) Logging system cost analysis: comparison of methods used. Res Pap NC-208, US For. Serv., North Cent. For. Exp. Stn., St. Paul, MN. p 15Google Scholar
  31. Olsen E, Kellogg L (1983) Comparison of time-study techniques for evaluating logging production. Transact ASAE 26(6):1665–1668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Perlack RD, Wright LL, Turhollow AF, Graham RL, Stokes BJ, Erbach DC (2005) Biomass as feedstock for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry: the technical feasibility of a billion-ton annual supply. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TNCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Reisinger TW, Gallagher TV (2001) Evaluation and comparison of two tree-length harvesting systems operating on steep slopes in West Virginia. In: Wang J, Wolford M, McNeel J (eds) Proceedings of the 24th annual meeting of the council on forest engineering: Appalachian hardwoods: managing change, July 15–18, 2001, Council on Forest Engineering, Snowshoe, WV, pp 56–64Google Scholar
  34. Rummer B, Len D, O’Brien O (2004) Forest residues bund-ling project—new technology for residue removal. USDA forest service, southern research station, Auburn, AL. Accessed 16 May 2009
  35. Scott DA, Dean TJ (2006) Energy trade-offs between intensive biomass utilization, site productivity loss, and ameliorative treatments in loblolly pine plantations. Biomass Bioenergy 30(12):1001–1010. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2005.12.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sokhansanj S, Kumar A, Turhollow A (2006) Development and implementation of integrated biomass supply analysis and logistics model (IBSAL). Biomass Bioenergy 30(10):838–847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Spinelli R, Nati C, Magagnotti N (2007) Recovering logging residue: experiences from the Italian Eastern Alps. Croat J Forest Eng 28:1–9Google Scholar
  38. Stenzel G, Walbridge TA, Pearce JK (1985) Logging and pulpwood production, 2nd edn. Wiley-Inter-Science Publisher, New York, p 358Google Scholar
  39. Stokes BJ, Schilling A (1997) Improved harvesting systems for wet sites. Forest Ecol Manag 90:155–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stuart WB (1981) Harvesting analysis technique: a computer simulation system for timber harvesting. Forest Prod J 31(11):45–53Google Scholar
  41. Tufts RA, Mills WL Jr (1982) Financial analysis of equipment replacement. Forest Prod J 32(10):45–52Google Scholar
  42. Tufts RA, Lanford BL, Greene WD, Burrows JO (1985) Auburn harvesting analyzer. Compiler 3(2):14–15Google Scholar
  43. Visser RJM, McDonaugh KD, Meller RD, McDonald TP (2004) Harvesting system simulation using a systems dynamic model. S J Appl Forest 28(2):91–99Google Scholar
  44. Wang J (2007) Hardwood log bucking and loading efficiency in West Virginia. Forest Prod J 57(5):84–90Google Scholar
  45. Wang J, Greene W (1999) An interactive simulation system for modeling stands, harvests, and machines. J Forest Eng 10(1):81–99Google Scholar
  46. Wang J, LeDoux C (2003) Estimating and validating ground-based timber harvesting production through computer simulation. Forest Sci 49(1):64–76Google Scholar
  47. Wang J, Greene WD, Stokes BJ (1998) Stand, harvest, and equipment interactions in simulated harvesting prescriptions. Forest Prod J 48(9):81–86Google Scholar
  48. Wang J, McNeel J, Baumgras J (2003) A computer-based time study system for timber harvesting operations. Forest Prod J 53(3):47–53Google Scholar
  49. Wang J, Long C, McNeel J (2004a) Production and cost analysis of a feller-buncher and grapple skidder in central Appalachian hardwood forests. Forest Prod J 54(12):159–167Google Scholar
  50. Wang J, Long C, McNeel J, Baumgras J (2004b) Productivity and cost of manual felling and cable skidding in central Appalachian hardwood forests. Forest Prod J 54(12):45–51Google Scholar
  51. Wang J, LeDoux C, Li Y (2005) Simulating cut-to-length harvesting operations in Appalachian hardwoods. Int J Forest Eng 16(2):11–27Google Scholar
  52. Wu J, Wang J, McNeel J (2011) Economic modeling of woody biomass utilization for bioenergy and its application in central Appalachia. Can J Forest Res 41(1):165–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wu J, Wang J, Li Y, Spong B (2012) A web-based decision support system for analyzing timber harvesting costs and productivity. N J Appl Forest 29(3):141–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Forestry and Natural ResourcesWest Virginia UniversityMorgantownUSA

Personalised recommendations