Advertisement

An Abbreviated Survey

  • Elaine ChewEmail author
Chapter
Part of the International Series in Operations Research & Management Science book series (ISOR, volume 204)

Abstract

This chapter weaves together a backdrop of related work in music theory, cognitive science, and operations research that has inspired and influenced the design of the Spiral Array and its associated algorithms. The chapter begins with an overview of the Spiral Array model and its core ideas. This is followed by a review of some spatial models for musical pitch that have informed the model’s design, and an overview of the Harmonic Network (a.k.a. the tonnetz) and some of its applications. The idea of the center of effect (CE) is central to the Spiral Array and its associated algorithms. The idea of the CE draws inspiration from interior point methods in linear optimization. The second part of the chapter describes the von Neumann Center of Gravity algorithm and Dantzig’s bracketing technique to speed convergence, and then draws analogies between the algorithm and the CEG method.

Keywords

Interior Point Algorithm Linear Optimization Problem Music Theory Pitch Relation Pitch Class 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Balzano, G.J.: The group-theoretic description of 12-fold and microtonal pitch systems. Comp. Music J. 4(4), 66–84 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bragg, J., Chew, E., Shieber, S.: Neo-Riemannian cycle detection with weighted finite-state transducers. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cappuzo, G.: Neo-Riemannian theory and the analysis of pop-rock music. Music Theor. Spectr. 26(2), 177–199 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chew, E.: Out of the grid and Into the spiral: geometric interpretations of and comparisons with the Spiral Array model. In: Hewlett, W.B., Selfridge-Field, E., Correia Jr, E. (eds.) Tonal Theory for the Digital Age, Computing in Musicology, vol. 15. CCARH, Stanford (1999)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Childs, A.: Moving beyond Neo-Riemannian triads: exploring a transformational model for seventh chords. J. Music Theor. 42, 181–193 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chuan, C.-H., Chew, E.: Generating and evaluating musical harmonizations that emulate style. Comput. Music J. 35(4), 64–82 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cohn, R.: Maximally smooth cycles, hexatonic systems, and the analysis of late-romantic triadic progressions. Music Anal. 15, 9–40 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cohn, R.: Neo-Riemannian operations, parsimonious trichords, and their tonnetz representations. J. Music Theor. 41, 1–66 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cohn, R.: Introduction to Neo-Riemannian theory: a survey and a historical perspective. J. Music Theor. 42(2), 167–180 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dahlhaus, C.: Studies in the Origin of Harmonic Tonality. Trans. Robert, O. Gjerdingen. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1990)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dantzig, G.B.: Converting a converging algorithm into a polynomially bounded algorithm. Systems Optimization Laboratory Technical Report, Report SOL 915, Stanford University, Stanford (1991)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dantzig, G.B.: An \(\varepsilon \)-precise feasible solution to a constraint in 1/\(\varepsilon ^2\) iterations independent of problem size. Systems Optimization Laboratory Technical Report, Report SOL 925, Stanford University, Stanford (1992)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dantzig, G.B.: Bracketing to speed convergence illustrated on the von Neumann algorithm for finding a feasible solution to a linear program with a convexity constraint. Systems Optimization Laboratory Technical Report, Report SOL 926, Stanford University, Stanford (1992)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dantzig, G.B., Thappa, M.N.: Von Neumann’s method. In: Linear Programming 2: Theory and Extensions, pp. 7084. Springer, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Douthett, J., Steinbach, P.: Parsimonious graphs: a study in parsimony, contextual transformations, and modes of limited transposition. J. Music Theor. 42(2), 241–264 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gollin, E.: Some aspects of three-dimensional tonnetze. J. Music Theor. 42, 195–206 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hewlett, W.B., Selfridge-Field, E. (eds.) Special Issue on Similarity in Music. Computing in Musicology, vol. 11, CCARH, Stanford (1999)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hillier, F.S., Lieberman, G.J.: Introduction to Operations Research, 9/e. McGraw-Hill, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hook, J.: Uniform triadic transformations. Ph.D. Dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington (2002)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Krumhansl, C.L.: The psychological representation of musical pitch in a tonal context. Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford (1978)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Krumhansl, C.L., Kessler, E.J.: Tracing the dynamic changes in perceived tonal organisation in a spatial representation of musical keys. Psychol. Rev. 89(4), 334–368 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Krumhansl, C.L.: Cognitive Foundations of Musical Pitch. Oxford University Press, New York (1990)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Krumhansl, C.L.: Perceived triad distance: evidence supporting the psychological reality of Neo-Riemannian transformations. J. Music Theor. 42(2), 265–281 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Krumhansl, C.L.: The geometry of musical structure. Theoretical ACM computers in entertainment 3(4) (2005) doi: 10.1145/1095534.1095542Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lerdahl, F.: Tonal Pitch Space. Oxford University Press, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lewin, D.: A formal theory of generalized tonal functions. J. Music Theor. 26(1), 32–60 (1982)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lewin, D.: Generalized Musical Intervals and Transformations. Yale University Press, New York (1987)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lewin, D.: Cohn functions. J. Music Theor. 40(2), 181–216 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Longuet-Higgins, H.C.: Letter to a musical friend. Music Rev 23, 244–248 (1962)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Longuet-Higgins, H.C.: Second letter to a musical friend. Music Rev 23, 271–280 (1962)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Longuet-Higgins, H.C., Steedman, M.J.: On interpreting Bach. In: Meltzer, B., Michie, D. (eds.) Machine Intelligence, vol. 6, pp. 221–241. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh (1971)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Shepard, R.N.: The analysis of proximities: multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function (Part I). Psychometrika 27(2), 125–140 (1962)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Shepard, R.N.: The analysis of proximities: multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function (Part II). Psychometrika 27(3), 219–246 (1962)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Shepard, R.N.: Structural representations of musical pitch. In: Deutsch, D. (ed.) The Psychology of Music, pp. 335–353. Academic Press, New York (1982)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tanguiane, A.S.: Artificial Perception and Music Recognition. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 746. Springer, New York (1993)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zatorre, R.J., Krumhansl, C.L.: Mental models and musical minds. Science 298(5601), 2138–2139 (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Digital MusicQueen Mary University of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations