Skip to main content

Growth and Profit

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Understanding the Myth of High Growth Firms

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Business ((BRIEFSBUSINESS))

  • 1039 Accesses

Abstract

In this section, we look more closely at the relationship of growth and profit and why, despite the seeming ignoring of profit in the discussion of growth entrepreneurship it remains ultimately of critical importance. To start this discussion, it is appropriate to return to one of the intellectual founders of the field of entrepreneurship, Schumpeter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    EBIT = (100*Earnings before interest and taxes/revenues). See Appendix II. In addition to EBIT, earnings before interest and taxes, depreciation and amortization measure (EBIT-DA) is also often preferred.

  2. 2.

    It is acknowledged that from a legal perspective the interpretation of the law is not as clear as presented here. No legal claims are suggested, but rather the law is presented here in order to validate the argument of profits being a fundamental part of any firm, and to show that it is of great importance to deliver profits in ways found most beneficial from the views of both the firm and its shareholders.

References

  • Aaltonen, J., & Östermark, R. (1998). Mixed markov modelling of financial success: Empirical evidence with Swedish data. Kybernetes, 27(1), 54–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Achtenhagen, L., Naldi, L., & Melin, L. (2010). “Business growth”—Do practitioners and scholars really talk about the same thing? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34, 289–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. E., & Martinez, M. A. (2001). Many are called, but few are chosen: An evolutionary perspective for the study of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 25(4), 41–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Autio, E. (2007). GEM 2007 Global Report on High-Growth Entrepreneurship. London: GERA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besanko, D., Dranove, D., & Shanley, M. (1996). Economics and strategy. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch, D. (1987). Job creation in America: How our smallest companies put the most people to work. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brännback, M., & Carsrud, A. (2008). Do They See What We See? A Critical Nordic Tale About Perceptions Of Entrepreneurial Opportunities, Goals and Growth. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 16(1), 55–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brännback, M., & Carsrud, A. (2009). Cognitive maps in entrepreneurship: Researching sense making and action. In A. Carsrud & M. Brännback (Eds.), Understanding the entrepreneurial mind. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brännback, M., Carsrud, A., Renko, M., Östermark, R., Aaltonen, J., & Kiviluoto, N. (2009). Growth and profitability in small privately held biotech firms: Preliminary findings. New Biotechnology, 25(5), 369–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. (1949). The hero with a thousand faces. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capon, N., & Farley, J. U., & Hoenig, S. (1990). Determinants of financial performance: A meta-analysis. Management Science, 30(10), 1143–1159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carsrud, A., & Brännback, M. (2007). Entrepreneurship. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, D., & Coviello, N. (1996). Qualitative research issues at the marketing/entrepreneurship interface. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 14(6), 51–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carland, J. W., Hoy, F., Boulton, W. R., & Carland, J. A. (1984). Differentiating entrepreneurs from small business owners: A conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 354–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator’s solution- Creating and sustaining successful growth. Boston: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, N. C., & Mullins, J. W. (May 2001). How fast can your company afford to grow? Harvard Business Review, 79(5), 135–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, A. H. (1959). Business enterprise in its social setting. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope, J. (2005). Researching entrepreneurship through phenomenological inquiry: Philosophical and methodological issues. International Small Business Journal, 23(2), 163–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowling, M. (2004). The growth-profit nexus. Small Business Economics, 22, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, P. (2005). Researching entrepreneurship. Boston, MA: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, P., & Delmar, F. (2006). High-growth firms and their contribution to employment: The case of Sweden 1987–96. In P. Davidsson, F. Delmar & J. Wiklund (Eds.), Entrepreneurship and the growth of firms. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, P., Steffens, P., & Fitzsimmons, J. (2009). Growing profitable or growing from profits: Putting the horse in front of the cart? Journal of Business Venturing, 24(4), 388–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delmar, F., Davidsson, P., & Gartner, W. B. (2003). Arriving at the high-growth firm. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 189–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. F. (1982). The changing world of the executive. New York: Truman Talley Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. F. (2001). The essential Drucker. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. The Academy of management Review, 24(2), 191–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadiesh, O., & Gilbert, J. L. (1998). Profit pools: A fresh look at strategy. Harvard Business Review, 76(3), 139–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, W. B. (1985). A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venture creation. The Academy of Management Review, 12(4), 696–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibb, A. A. (2000). SME policy, academic research and the growth of ignorance, mythical concepts, myths, assumptions, ritual and confusions. International Small Business Journal, 18, 13–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haltiwanger, J. C., Jarmin, R. S., & Miranda, J. (2010). Who creates jobs? Small vs. large vs. young. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 16300. Available at: http://www.nber.org/papers/w16300.pdf(10.5.2011)

  • Hopeasaari, V. (2011). Palkka voi olla osinkoa edullisempaa. Taloushallinto: Association of Finnish Accounting Firms

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. M. (1973). Competition and entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. M. (2009). The alert and creative entrepreneur: A clarification. Small Business Economics, 32, 145–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiviluoto, N., Brännback, M., Carsrud, A. (2009). Are Firm Growth and Performance the Same or Different Concepts in Empirical Entrepreneurship Studies? An analysis of the dependent and independent variables. Paper presented at RENT 2009 Conference, Budapest, Hungary. The paper is in proceedings for the RENT Anthology

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiviluoto, N., Brännback, M., Carsrud, A. (2010). Back to square one? Comparing experts’ perceptions of venture growth and profitability with financial facts. Paper presented at the AGSE 2010 Conference, Sunshine Coast, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiviluoto, N. (2011). Rediscovering profitability in entrepreneurship. Evidence from Finnish high-technology start-ups, Åbo Akademis förlag, Åbo

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiviluoto, N. (2014). Growth as evidence of firm success, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, In Press available online at http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08985626.2013.814716

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Leitch, C. M., Hill, F. M., & Harrison, R. T. (2010). The philosophy and practice of interpretivist research in entrepreneurship- Quality, validation and trust. Organizational Research Methods, 13(1), 67–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leppiniemi, J., & Leppiniemi, R. (2011). Tilinpäätöksen tulkinta. Helsinki: WSOYPro Oy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levie, J., & Lichtenstein, B. B. (2010). A terminal assessment of stages theory: Introducing a dynamic states approach to entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34, 317–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levie, J., Don, D., & Leleux, B. (2011). The new venture mortality myth. In K. Hindle & K. Klyver (Eds.), Handbook of research on new venture creation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markman, G. D., & Gartner, W. B. (2002). Is extraordinary growth profitable? A study of inc. 500 high-growth companies. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(1), 65–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKelvie, A., & Wiklund, J. (2010). Advancing firm growth research: A focus on growth mode instead of growth rate. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34, 261–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, G., Hyytinen, A., & Maula, M. (2009). Growth entrepreneurship and finance in Ministry of Education and the Ministry of Employment and the Economy, Evaluation of the Finnish national innovation system- Full report. Taloustieto Oy, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls-Nixon, C. L. (2005). Rapid growth and high performance: The entrepreneur’s “impossible dream?”. Academy of Management Executive, 19(1), 77–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E. T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitelis, C. N. (2009). Edith Penrose’s ’The Theory of the Growth of the Firm’ fifty years later in Penrose, E. (2009). The theory of the growth of the firm (4th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehn, A., Brannback, M., Carsrud, A., Lindahl, M. (2014) Challenging the myths of entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, forthcoming, available online at http://dx.doi.org./10.1080/08985626.2013.818846

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard, P. J., Devinney, T. T., Yip, G. S., Johnson, G. (2009). Measuring organizational performance: Towards methodological best practice. Journal of Management, 34(3), 718–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roper, S. (1999). Modelling small business growth and profitability. Small Business Economics, 13, 235–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (September 1928). The instability of capitalism. The Economic Journal, 38(151), 361–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper & Brothers. Reprinted (2000), London and New York: Routledge. Page citations are from the 2000 edition

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1954). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. London: Allen&Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. (2008). The Illusions of Entrepreneurship. London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. (2009). Why encouraging more people to become entrepreneurs is bad public policy. Small Business Economics, 33, 141–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, D., & Wiklund, J. (2009). Are we comparing apples with apples or apples with oranges? appropriateness of knowledge accumulation across growth studies. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 33(1), 105–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffens, P., Davidsson, P., & Fitzsimmons, J. (2009). Performance configuration over time: Implications for growth- and profit-oriented strategies. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 33(1), 125–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilles, S. (1963). How to evaluate corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, Jul/Aug: 111–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkataraman, S. (1997). The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research: An editor’s perspective. In J. Katz & R. Brockhaus (Eds.), Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence, and Growth. Greenwich: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinzimmer, L. G., Nystrom, P. C., & Freeman, S. J. (1998). Measuring organizational growth: Issues, consequences and guidelines. Journal of Management, 24(2), 235–262.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Malin Brännback .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brännback, M., Carsrud, A., Kiviluoto, N. (2014). Growth and Profit. In: Understanding the Myth of High Growth Firms. SpringerBriefs in Business. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9457-7_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics