Impact on Biodiversity

  • José Falck-Zepeda
  • Patricia Zambrano
  • Melinda Smale
Chapter
Part of the Natural Resource Management and Policy book series (NRMP, volume 37)

Abstract

The impact of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) on “the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity,” as stated in Article 26 of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety ((Secretariat of the Convention of Biological Diversity 2000, p. 19), has generated a heated and polarized debate. On one side is the position of those who believe that not only economic but ethical, religious, and cultural considerations related to biodiversity should be taken into account. On the other side, stand those who believe that the impact of GMOs on the environment should be circumscribed to environmental assessments. Whatever the position, generating a useful analysis of the impacts of GMOs on biological diversity requires thoughtful definition of concepts and selection of appropriate valuation methods.

Keywords

Biomass Arena 

References

  1. 2010 Biodiversity Indicators Partnership (2010) Biodiversity indicators and the 2010 target: experiences and lessons learnt from the 2010 Biodiversity Indicators Partnership (Technical Series No. 53). Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, MontréalGoogle Scholar
  2. Bennett J, Birol E (eds) (2010) Chapter I. Using choice experiments to investigate environmental conservation and economic development trade-offs. In: Choice experiments in developing countries implementation, challenges and policy implications. Edward Elgar Publishing, NorthamptonGoogle Scholar
  3. Cardinale B, Duffy E, Gonzalez A et al (2012) Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 486:59–67. doi:10.1038/nature11148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cockell C (2006) Biological processes associated with impact events ESF IMPACT, 1st edn. Springer, Berlin, pp 197–219 (ISBN 978-3-540-25735–6)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Convention on Biological Diversity (1992) United Nations. http://www.cbd.int/doc/legal/cbd-en.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2013
  6. Daniel TC, Muhar A, Arnberger A et al (2012) Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109(23):8812–8819. doi:10.1073/pnas.1114773109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP et al (2005) Global consequences of land use. Science 309:570–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gomez-Baggethun E, Martin-Lopez B (2012) The socio-economic costs of biodiversity loss. Lychnos 3:68–73Google Scholar
  9. Haines-Young R, Potschin M (2010) The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being. In Raffaelli DG, Frid LJ (eds) Ecosystem ecology—a new synthesis. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. Hawksworth. D. L. 1995. Biodiversity: Measurement and Estimation. The Royal Society and Chapman and Hall Publishers, London, UK. ISBN 0 412 75220 4Google Scholar
  11. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Concepts of ecosystem value and valuation approaches. http://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.304.aspx.pdf. Accessed 10 May 2013
  12. Phalan B, Balmford A, Green RE et al (2011) Minimising the harm to biodiversity of producing more food globally. Food Policy 36(Suppl 1):S62–S71Google Scholar
  13. Rabosky DL (2009) Ecological limits and diversification rate: alternative paradigms to explain the variation in species richness among clades and regions. Ecology Letters 12(8):735–743. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01333.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Smale M (ed) (2006) Valuing crop biodiversity: on-farm genetic resources and economic change. CABI Publishing, WallingfordGoogle Scholar
  15. TEEB (2010) Mainstreaming the economics of nature: a synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB. http://www.teebweb.org/wp-content/uploads/Study%20and%20Reports/Reports/Synthesis%20report/TEEB%20Synthesis%20Report%202010.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2013
  16. Tilman D, Fargione J, Wolff B et al (2001) Forecasting agriculturally driven global environmental change. Science 292:281–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. UNEP-WCMC (2011) Developing ecosystem service indicators: experiences and lessons learned from sub-global assessments and other initiatives (Technical Series No 58). Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, MontréalGoogle Scholar
  18. United Nations (2005) Millennium Development Goals Report 2005. United Nations Department of Public Information, New York. http://unstats.un.org/unsd/mi/pdf/MDG%20Book.pdf Accessed 31 May 2013.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • José Falck-Zepeda
    • 1
  • Patricia Zambrano
    • 1
  • Melinda Smale
    • 2
  1. 1.International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)WashingtonUSA
  2. 2.207 Agriculture HallMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations