Skip to main content

An Integrated International Learning Model for Internationalizing I/O Psychology Programs

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Internationalizing the Curriculum in Organizational Psychology

Abstract

Today’s companies that employ industrial/organizational (I/O) psychologists typically have international linkages, whether the company is itself multinational or the company has international partners, vendors, or consumers. These companies would benefit from having I/O psychology (IOP) professionals who are knowledgeable about IOP practices that transcend national boundaries or constrained by them. Therefore, it behooves IOP graduate programs to prepare their students to provide services that benefit an international workforce. In this chapter, we present the integrated international learning (IIL) model. This model forwards different ways of designing international IOP programs by combining didactic and experiential approaches in traditional or virtual instructional environments and international or stationary settings. We present pedagogical approaches to internationalize programs that range from simple reinforcement that IOP theories might not cross cultural boundaries to entire programmatic curricula that infuse an international or cross-cultural component throughout all coursework. In particular, we recommend that IOP programs consider the modern work environment, which struggles with both a physical and a virtual workspace, by featuring at a minimum a virtually abroad program (an international program deployed through the web with international partners) at maximum incorporating all learning approaches i.e., an entire degree program. Activities that would support the variety of possible instructional methodologies include hosting an international cadre of faculty from around the globe both via the web and in person, research collaborations between host and visiting students and faculty, team projects across the globe, study abroad, and more. We argue that by educating graduate students to understand global and cross-cultural issues related to IOP, they will be able to design and implement IOP interventions across national and organizational cultures with refined cross-cultural competence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Industrial and organizational psychology is also known in some countries as work psychology (e.g., Hungary, Italy, and France) or work, organizational, and personnel psychology (e.g., Spain).

  2. 2.

    http://ec.europa.eu/education/lifelong-learning-programme/doc80_en.htm.

  3. 3.

    www.iie.org/fulbright/.

  4. 4.

    www.irex.org/.

  5. 5.

    http://cordis.europa.eu/improving/fellowships/home.htm.

  6. 6.

    http://www.ciee.org/index.htm#work.

  7. 7.

    http://www.iagora.com/iwork/leonardo-grants/

References

  • Anderson, P. H., Lawton, L., Rexeisen, R. J., & Hubbard, A. C. (2006). Short-term study abroad and intercultural sensitivity: A pilot study. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30, 457–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, M. J. (1986). Towards ethnorelativism: A developmental model of intercultural sensitivity. In R. M. Paige (Ed.), Cross-cultural orientation: New conceptualizations and applications (pp. 27–70). New York: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L., et al (2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74, 379–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Borokhovski, E., Wade, C. A., Tamim, R. M., Surkes, M. A., & Bethel, E. C. (2009). A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education. Review of Educational Research, 79, 1243–1288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, J. W., Phinney, J. S., Sam, D. L., & Vedder, P. (2006). Immigrant youth: Acculturation, identity, and adaptation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 55, 303–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhawuk, D. P. S. (2001). Evolution of culture assimilators: Toward theory-based assimilators. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 25, 141–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blasco, M. (2009). Cultural pragmatists? Student perspectives on learning culture at a business school. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8, 174–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brislin, R. W., & Yoshida, T. (1994). Intercultural communication training: An introduction. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casrnir, F. L. (1999). Foundations for the study of intercultural communication based on a third-culture building model. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 23, 91–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiecher, A., Donolo, D., & Rinaudo, M. C. (2009). Regulación y planificación del estudio. Una perspectiva comparativa en ambientes presenciales y virtuales. [Regulating and planning one’s study: A comparative perspective of face-to-face and virtual environments]. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 7(1), 209–224. http://www.investigacionpsicopedagogica.org/revista/new/ContadorArticulo.php?274

  • Dekker, D. M., Rutte, C. G., & Van den Berg, P. T. (2008). Cultural differences in the perception of critical interaction behaviors in global virtual teams. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 32, 441–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education New York: Collier Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egan, M. L., & Bendick, M. Jr. (2008). Combining multicultural management and diversity into one course on cultural competence. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7, 387–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Essenhigh, R. H.. (2000, Spring). A few thoughts on the difference between education and training. Letter to the editor of National Forum: The Phi Kappa Phi Journal. p. 46. http://www.uamont.edu/facultyweb/gulledge/Articles/ Education%20versus%20Training%20.pdf.

  • Ferdman, B. M. (2003). Learning about our and others’ selves: Multiple identities and their sources. In N. A. Boyacigiller, R. A. Goodman & M. E. Phillips (Eds.), Crossing cultures: Insights from master teachers. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferdman, B. M., & Brody, S. E. (1996). Models of diversity training. In D. Landis & R. S. Bhagat (Eds.), Handbook of intercultural training (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gannon, M. J. (2012). Sequential cross-cultural learning: From dimensions to cultural metaphors to paradoxes. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 5, 233–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gannon, M. J., & Poon, J. M. L. (1997). Effects of alternative instructional approaches on cross-cultural training outcomes. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 21, 429–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, C. B., & Zellmer-Bruhn, M. (2002). Minding your metaphors: Applying the concept of teamwork metaphors to the management of teams in multicultural contexts. Organizational Dynamics, 31(2), 101–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glazer, S. (2002). Past, present, and future of cross-cultural studies in Industrial and Organizational psychology. In C. Cooper & I. T. Robertson International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (vol. 17, pp. 145–185). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glazer, S., Kozusznik, M., & Shargo, I. (2012). Global virtual teams: Solution or cause of work-related stress during economically challenged times. In P. L. Perrewé, C. Rosen, & J. Halbesleben (Eds.), Research in occupational stress and well being: The role of the economic context on occupational stress and well being (vol. 10). Emerald Group Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • Graf, A. (2004). Assessing intercultural training designs. Journal of European Industrial Training, 28, 199–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groeppel-Klein, A., Germelmann, C. C., & Glaum, M. (2010). Intercultural interaction needs more than mere exposure: Searching for drivers of student interaction at border universities. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 34, 253–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M. M. (2006). Global forum: Cross-cultural skill: An emerging construct for the 21st century. The Industrial Organizational Psychologist, 43, 43–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. J. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingshead, A. B., McGrath, J. E., & O’Connor, K. M. (1993). Group task performance and communication technology: A longitudinal study of computer mediated vs. face-to-face work groups. Small Group Research, 24, 307–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, K., & Seki, K. (2012). Global leadership: A developmental shift for everyone. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 5, 196–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtbrügge, D., & Schillo, K. (2008). Intercultural training requirements for virtual assignments: Results of an explorative empirical study. Human Resource Development International, 11, 271–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hove, M. C., & Corcoran, K. J. (2008). Educational technologies: Impact on learning and frustration. Teaching of Psychology, 35, 121–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, M.-H., Ju, T. L., Yen, C.-H., & Chang, C.-M. (2007). Knowledge sharing behavior in virtual communities: The relationship between trust, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65, 153–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, A., Kessler, E. H., & Brancesco, A. M. (2004). Student networking behavior, culture, and grade performance: An empirical study and pedagogical recommendations. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 3, 139–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalfadellis, P. (May 2005 ). Integrating experiential learning in the teaching of cross-cultural communication. Department of Management Working Paper Series (ISSN 1327–5216). Monash University, Business and Economics. http://www.buseco.monash.edu.au/mgt/research/working-papers/2005/wp36-05.pdf. Accessed 15 June 2012

  • Ke, F. (2010). Examining online teaching, cognitive, and social presence for adult students. Computers & Education, 55, 808–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y. Y., & Bhawuk, D. P. S. (2008). Globalization and diversity: Contributions from intercultural research. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 32, 301–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mak, A. S., & Buckingham, K. (2007). Beyond communication courses: Are there benefits in adding skills-based ExcelL TM sociocultural training? International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 31, 277–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maki, R. H., Maki, W. S., Patterson, M., & Whittaker, P. D. (2000). Evaluation of a web- based introductory psychology course: I. learning and satisfaction in on-line versus lecture courses. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 32(2), 230–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcotte, C., Desroches, J., & Poupart, I. (2007). Preparing internationally minded business graduates: The role of international mobility programs. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 31, 655–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, K. Y., Van Dyne, L., & Ang, S. (2009). From experience to experiential learning: Cultural intelligence as a learning capability for global leader development. Academy of Management of Management Learning and Education, 8, 511–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osland, J. S., & Bird, A. (2000). Beyond sophisticated stereotyping: Cultural sense-making in context. Academy of Management Executive, 14, 65–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, P. J. (2010). Assessing intercultural effectiveness outcomes in a year-long study abroad program. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 34, 70–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pillania, R. K. (2008). Creation and categorization of knowledge in automative components SMEs in India. Management Decision, 46, 1452–1464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudestam, K. E. (2004). Distributed education and the role of online learning in training professional psychologists. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35(4), 427–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, T. L. (1999). The no significant difference phenomenon: A comparative research annotated bibliography on technology for distance education. Raleigh: Office of Instructional Telecommunications, North Carolina State University

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutkowski, A., Vogel, D., van Genuchten, M., & Saunders, C. (2008). Communication in virtual teams: Ten years of experience in education. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 51(3), 302–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, M., & Gelfand, M. (2012). Going global: Internationalizing the Organizational Psychology curriculum. In F. T. L. Leong, W. E. Pickren, M. M. Leach & A. J. Marsella (Eds.), Internationalizing the Psychology Curriculum in the United States, International and Cultural Psychology Series (pp. 245–261). New York: Springer Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassenberg, K., & Matschke, C. (2010). The impact of exchange programs on the integration of the host group into the self-concept. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(1), 148–159. http://search.proquest.com/docview/622178246?accountid=14777

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40(3), 437–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B., Gunnarson, S. K., & Niles-Jolly, K. (1994). Creating a climate and culture of success. Organizational Dynamics, 24(4), 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walther, J. B. (1997). Group and interpersonal effects in international computer-mediated collaboration. Human Communication Research, 23, 342–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sharon Glazer PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix 5.1 Resources for internationalizing I/O psychology programs

Appendix 5.1 Resources for internationalizing I/O psychology programs

Organization/Institution

URL

Synopsis

AOP—Alliance for Organizational Psychology

http://www.allianceorgpsych.org/

Integration of SIOP, EAWOP, and Division 1 of IAAP (Organizational Psychology Division) “to support and advance the science and practice of organizational psychology in the global world, and to expand its scope of application and contribution to society to improve the quality of working life.”

Cross-Cultural Competence (3C) Portal

www.defenseculture.org

“To provide tools and resources that promote discovery and learning to produce more effective leaders and operators…;” and to “cultivate cross-cultural competence through e-learning, video vignettes, avatar and virtual training, science and literature, podcasts, assessments, knowledge sharing, research development and publications, and collaboration across the spectrum of 3C.”

Cultural Knowledge Consortium

https://www.culturalknowledge.org/

“A Socio-cultural Knowledge Infrastructure (SKI) to facilitate access among multi-disciplinary, worldwide, social science knowledge holders that fosters collaborative engagement in support of socio-cultural analysis requirements. The CKC supports US government and military decision-makers, while supporting collaboration and knowledge sharing throughout the socio-cultural community.”

Division 52 of the American Psychological Association—International Psychology

http://www.internationalpsychology.net/

“To develop a psychological science and practice that is contextually informed, culturally inclusive, serves the public interest and promotes global perspectives within and outside of APA. The Division of International Psychology represents the interest of all psychologists who foster international connections among psychologists, engage in multicultural research or practice, apply psychological principles to the development of public policy or are otherwise concerned with individual and group consequences of global events.”

EAWOP

http://www.eawop.org/

“Facilitates research and practice in the field of Work and Organizational Psychology through its biannual conference, journals, summer schools, small group meetings, and workshops.”

European Erasmus Mundus Master on WOP-P

http://www.uv.es/erasmuswop/

“A graduate university programme, supported by the European Commission through the Erasmus Mundus Programme which provides a Postgraduate Diploma.”

European Network of Work and Organizational Psychologists

http://www.eawop.org/enop/

“The creation of ENOP [inn 1980] grew out of an acute awareness that the progress of European integration began to pose challenges both for scientific inquiry as well as professional practice, which called for renewed efforts in information exchange and concerted European action also by academics in the field of W/O psychology.”

IAAP—Division 1 Organizational Psychology

http://www.iaapsy.org/division1/

“An excellent international platform to exchange and create bridging and bonding relations within scientists, academics and practitioners all around the world.”

IAC of SIOP—International Affairs Committee

http://www.siop.org/reportsandminutes/Goals/12_13/IAC.aspx

A fairly new initiative to bring together I/O psychologists from around the world, encourage internationalization efforts, and propagate the importance of international and cross-cultural IOP matters

IACCP—International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology

http://www.iaccp.org/

Over 900 members from more than 70 countries. The goal is to facilitate communication among persons interested in a diverse range of issues involving the intersection of culture and psychology. Biyearly (on even years) congress and biyearly (on odd years) regional conferences

IAIR—International Academy for Intercultural Research

http://www.intercultural-academy.net/

Established in 1997, IAIR is “A professional interdisciplinary organization dedicated to the understanding and improvement of intercultural relations through world-class social science research.”

ICCM at FIT—Institute for Cross Cultural Management at Florida Institute of Technology

http://research.fit.edu/iccm/

“To develop leaders and organizations to succeed in the global environment. ICCM was founded to serve as a resource for international organizations facing the challenges of operating across time zones and cultures.”

ISSWOV—International Society for the Study of Work and Organizational Values

http://www.isswov.org/

Founded in 1988 in Budapest, “ISSWOV aims to advance the study of work and organizational values and related aspects of the organization; to encourage the exchange of ideas and interaction among scholars engaged in these topics; to collect, generate, preserve, decipher, and disseminate data and information relating to work and organizational values, and to encourage and initiate publications concerning research on these themes.”

Online Readings in Psychology and Culture

http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/orpc/

“Designed to serve as a [free] resource for researchers, teachers, students, and anyone who is interested in the interrelationships between Psychology and Culture.”

SCCR—Society for Cross-Cultural Research

http://www.sccr.org/

Established in 1971, SCCR is “a multi-disciplinary organization. Its members all share a common devotion to the conduct of cross-cultural research. SCCR members are professionals and students from the social science fields of Psychology, Anthropology, Sociology, and related fields including Education, Family Studies, Social Work, Human Development, Psychiatry, Communications, Ethnic Studies, Business, etc.”

SIOP International Directory

http://siop.org/internationaldirectory/

“The International Directory is provided by SIOP to help you find and communicate with organizations and people around the world”

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Glazer, S., Moliner, C., Carmona, C. (2014). An Integrated International Learning Model for Internationalizing I/O Psychology Programs. In: Griffith, R., Thompson, L., Armon, B. (eds) Internationalizing the Curriculum in Organizational Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9402-7_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics