Skip to main content

Training and Retraining I-O Psychology Faculty for Internationalization

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 692 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter is broadly directed toward industrial and organizational (I–O) psychology graduate programs and is intended to support efforts for faculty to internationalize their programs. They may be at various points on the journey to respond to the increasingly global context of their work and are likely to have many questions about their role in the process, their goals, and which of many possible approaches would be most effective and the best fit for their particular program. Goals related to designing the curricula, adapting the programs, and developing the future generation of I–O psychologists must be tied to a specification of the competencies needed for success. It is difficult to separate the need for developing these competencies in the students as well as in the faculty members. This chapter is focused on developing faculty, but the ultimate goal is developing future I–O psychologists. The assumption is that the faculty must first have the competencies to effectively train the students. The purpose of this chapter is to help guide I–O psychology faculty in assessing themselves and their programs, identifying the objectives of internationalization, and developing action plans to achieve their objectives. It includes background on broader academic internationalization efforts, activities specifically related to psychology, and the role of faculty in internationalization. It provides an overview of models of global competencies and identifies specific competencies and methods of assessment. The perspective on training faculty is based on established I–O psychology methodologies and addresses multilevel strategies to internationalize—individual, program, university, and external to the university. The final section looks to the future of international I–O psychology. Some personal anecdotes of the author are integrated into this chapter to emphasize the role of the individual faculty member. At the end of each of the major sections, a set of questions is presented to guide thinking and to provide some direction for internationalization efforts in I–O psychology graduate programs. Tools for assessment and planning are included in the appendices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agnew, M., & VanBalkom, W.D. (2009). Internationalization of the university: Factors impacting cultural readiness for organizational change. Intercultural Education, 20(5), 451–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altbach, P. G., & Knight, J. (2007). The internationalization of higher education: Motivations and realities. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11(3/4), 290–305. doi:10.1177/1028315307303542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association. (2005, November). American Psychological Association Task Force on internationalizing undergraduate psychology curriculum: Report and recommended learning outcomes for internationalizing the undergraduate curriculum. Washington, DC: Author. http://www.apa.org/ed/precollege/about/international.pdf.

  • American Psychological Association. (2007). APA guidelines for the undergraduate psychology major. Washington, DC: Author. http://www.apa.org/ed/precollege/about/psymajor-guidelines.pdf.

  • Ang, S., & Van Dyne, L., (2008). Conceptualization of cultural intelligence: Definition, distinctiveness, and nomological network. In S. Ang & L. Van Dyne (Eds.), Handbook on cultural intelligence: Theory, measurement and applications (pp. 3–15). Armonk: M. E. Sharpe. http://culturalq.com/docs/Ang%20&%20Van%20Dyne%202008%20Handbook%20Ch%201%20Conceptualization%20of%20CQ.pdf.

  • Bartell, M. (2003). Internationalization of universities: A university culture-based framework. Higher Education, 45, 43–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belar, C. (2008, July). Internationalizing psychology education. Monitor on Psychology, 39(7), 86. http://www.apa.org/monitor/2008/07-08/soe.aspx.

  • Brustein, W.I. (2007). The global campus: Challenges and opportunities for higher education in North America. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11(3/4), 382–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bücker, J., & Poutsma, E. (2010). Global management competencies: A theoretical foundation. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25(8), 829–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullock, M. (2011, November). APA’s international responsibility. Monitor on Psychology, 42(10), 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, T., Herst, D., & Chan, W. (2010). Global selection: Selection in international contexts. In K. Lundby & J. Jolton (Eds.), Going Global: Practical Applications and Recommendations for HR and OD Professionals in the Global Workplace. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, W. W. Y., & Dimmock, C. (2008). The internationalization of universities: Globalist, internationalist and translocalist models. Journal of Research in International Education, 7(2), 184–204. doi:10.1177/1475240908091304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Childress, L.K. (2009). Internationalization plans for higher education institutions. Journal of Studies in International Education, 13(3), 289–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosling, G., Edwards, R., & Schroder, B. (2008). Internationalizing the curriculum: The implementation experience in a Faculty of Business and Economics. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 30(2), 107–121. doi:10.1080/13600800801938721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deardorff, D. K. (2006). Identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a student outcome of internationalization. Journal of Studies in International Education, 10(3), 241–266. doi:10.1177/1028315306287002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. (2007). Challenges and opportunities for the internationalization of higher education in the coming decade: Planned and opportunistic initiatives in American institutions. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11(3/4), 373–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European master on work, organizational and personnel psychology. (n.d.) WOP-P: European master on work, organizational and personnel psychology. http://www.uv.es/erasmuswop/.

  • Gelfand, M. J., Leslie, L. M., & Fehr, R. (2008). To prosper, organizational psychology should…adopt a global perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 493–517. doi: 10.1002/job.530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, I. L., & Ford, J. K. (2002). Training in organizations: Needs assessment, development, and evaluation (4th ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, M.F., & Shoenberg, R. (2006). Where faculty live: Internationalizing the disciplines. American council on education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollenbeck, G. P., & McCall, M. W. (2003). Competence, not competencies: Making global executive development work. In W. H. Mobley & P. W. Dorfman (Eds.), Advances in global leadership: Vol 3 (pp. 101–119). London: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. doi:10.1016/S1535-1203(02)03005-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, K., & Seki, K. (2012). Global leadership: A developmental shift for everyone. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5(2), 196–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, B., White, G.P., & Godbey, G.C. (2006). What does it mean to be globally competent? Journal of Studies in International Education, 10(3), 267–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Javidan, M., Hough, L., & Bullough, A. (n.d.). Conceptualizing and measuring global mindset: Development of the Global Mindset Inventory. Thunderbird Global Mindset Institute. from http://www.thunderbird.edu/wwwfiles/pdf/knowledge_network/ctrs_excellence/global_mindset_leadership_institute/gmi-tech-report.pdf.

  • Knight, J. (2004). Internationalization remodeled: Definition, approaches, and rationales. Journal of Studies in International Education, 8(1), 5–31. doi: 10.1177/1028315303260832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovvorn, A. S., & Chen, J. S. (2011). Developing a global mindset: The relationship between an international assignment and cultural intelligence. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(9), 275–283. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/904530682/fulltextPDF/137242D557F6BD8E09B/1?accountid=4886.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundby, K., & Jolton, J. (Eds.). (2010). Going global: Practical applications and recommendations for HR and OD professional in the global workplace. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, M. W., & Hollenbeck, G. P. (2002). Developing global executives: The lessons of international experiences. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, J., Burke, B., Frame, M., & Moffett, R., III. (2013). The importance of international competencies in Industrial-Organizational Psychology Graduate Curricula. Poster presented at the 28th annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Houston, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odgers, T., & Giroux, I. (2006, March). Internationalizing faculty: A phased approach to transforming curriculum design and instruction. Paper presented at the York University Annual International Conference on Internationalizing Canada’s Universities, Toronto, Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hara, S. (2009, May). Vital and overlooked: The role of faculty in internationalizing US campuses. Meeting America’s Global Education Challenge, 6, 38–45. http://www.iie.org/en/Research-and-Publications/Publications-and-Reports/IIE-Bookstore/~/media/Files/Corporate/Membership/StudyAbroad_WhitePaper6.ashx.

  • Otten, M. (2009). Academicus interculturalis? Negotiating interculturality in academic communities of practice. Intercultural Education, 20(5), 407–417. doi:10.1080/14675980903371266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, A. M., Leong, F. T. L., & Oswald, F. L. (Eds.). (2012). Conducting multinational research: Applying organizational psychology in the workplace. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, M. A., Harrison, D. A., Gregersen, H., Black, J. S., & Ferzandi, L. A. (2006). You can take it with you: Individual differences and expatriate effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 109–125. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.109.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stohl, M. (2007). We have met the enemy and he is us: The role of the faculty in the internationalization of higher education in the coming decade. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11(3/4), 359–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, N. (2006). Internationalising the student learning experience: Possible indicators. Journal of Studies in International Education, 10(4), 409–413. doi:10.1177/1028315306287633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. (2004). Toward a strategy for internationalization: Lessons and practice from four universities. Journal of Studies in International Education, 8(2), 149–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Cultural Intelligence Center. (n.d.). CQ assessments. Retrieved from http://culturalq.com/assessments.html.

  • Thunderbird School of Global Management. (n.d.). Global Mindset Inventory. http://www.thunderbird.edu/knowledge_network/ctrs_excellence/global_mindset_leadership_institute/global_mindset_inventory/index.htm.

  • U.S. Department of Education. (n.d.) European Union-United States Atlantis Program. http://www2.ed.gov/programs/fipseec/index.html.

  • U.S. Department of State: Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs. (n.d.). Fulbright international educational exchange program. http://fulbright.state.gov/.

  • Wildman, J. L., Xavier, L. F., Tindall, M., and Salas, E. (2010). Best practices for training intercultural competence in global organizations. In K. Lundby & J. Jolton (Eds.), Going global: Practical applications and recommendations for HR and OD professionals in the global workplace. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Beverly Burke PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendix A

PEAK Self-Assessment

Personality/Traits/Personal Characteristics

Good judgment, adaptable, open-minded, openness to experience, conscientiousness, tolerance for ambiguity, openness to change, nonjudgmental, perseverance, curiosity, patience, emotional stability, initiative, cultural flexibility, empathy, goal-oriented, self-efficacy, independent, enthusiasm, confidence, adaptability of frame of reference and behavior, adaptability and adjustment to new environment, openness toward intercultural learning and people from other cultures, flexibility, tolerating and engaging ambiguity, cross-cultural empathy, withholding judgment, curiosity and discovery.

Strengths:

Weaknesses:

Examples of representative past experiences:

Developmental plan:

Experience

Building relationships with different cultures and experience with different cultures.

Strengths:

Weaknesses:

Examples of representative past experiences:

Developmental plan:

Attitudes/Values/Awareness

Global citizen, meta-cognition, tolerance for differences among people, respectful for others, awareness of prejudices and stereotypes, cultural sensitivity, cultural awareness, valuing different national cultures, cultural humility, intercultural adroitness, awareness, sensitivity that leads to global citizenship, understanding others’ worldviews, cultural self-awareness and self-assessment, respect for other cultures, understanding the value of cultural diversity, mindfulness, ethno-relative view.

Strengths:

Weaknesses:

Examples of representative past experiences:

Developmental plan:

Knowledge/Skills/Abilities

Good verbal communication skills, good listening skills, interpersonal skills, ability to manage stress, good nonverbal communication skills, effective coping strategies, general cultural knowledge, conflict resolution skills, effective intercultural communication, ability to identify and engage in unfamiliar cultural behaviors, behaving appropriately and effectively, achieving goals through intercultural interaction, intercultural interpersonal skills and accurate and appropriate communication, skills to listen and observe, adapting to varying intercultural communication and learning styles, skills to analyze/interpret/and relate, deep knowledge and understanding of one’s own and other cultures, understanding the role and impact of culture and contexts, cognitive flexibility between etic and emic, sociolinguistic competence, learning through interaction, culture-specific knowledge.

Strengths:

Weaknesses:

Examples of representative past experiences:

Developmental plan:

The competencies listed here are drawn from Deardorff’s (2006) and Murray et al.’s (2013) work.

Appendix B

Guidelines: Assessment and Planning for Internationalization

This list provides a guide for faculty to internationalize their programs. The list reflects potential activities and areas where faculty can self-assess and plan and where they can develop knowledge and skills. It is presented as a guide for targeting activities in a step-by-step, ongoing effort and is not intended to be a short-term list to accomplish. Development of an individual faculty member is embedded in the process and is integral to internationalizing the program.

Assessment of Current Situation

Individual

  • Perform quantitative and/or qualitative assessment for global competencies.

  • Create a developmental plan to develop global competencies.

Program

  • Articulate the mission, orientation, and philosophy of the program.

  • Identify existing international content, activities, and initiatives in the program:

    • Course content related to internationalization.

    • Research topics related to internationalization—students and faculty.

    • Applied work with an international component—students and faculty.

    • Extracurricular activities with an international component

  • Identify the international diversity of students.

  • Assess the international expertise and experience of faculty members.

  • Assess the commitment of individual faculty members to internationalization.

  • Identify needs for internationalization in the program.

University

  • Determine the university’s approach to internationalization: bottom-up or top-down.

  • If top-down, assess the congruency of university strategy with program objectives for internationalization.

  • If bottom-up, assess the university climate for international activities.

  • Learn the university’s administrative structure for international activities.

  • Learn the university’s policies and procedures for international activities.

  • Identify support and resources within the university for international activities.

External environment

  • Identify support and resources from external sources for international activities.

  • Identify multinational businesses in the local area.

  • Identify cultural groups in the local area.

  • Assess the international diversity in the local area.

Planning: Objectives and Action Plans

Objectives

  • Position the program internationally in a way that is congruent with program objectives:

    • Minimum internationalization for competency in the field

    • Internationalization as a strength of the program

    • Program identified as an internationallyfocused program

  • Specify and prioritize program objectives related to internationalization.

  • Specify student learning objectives related to internationalization.

Action plans

  • Conduct short-term planning and long-term planning for internationalization objectives. Include a time frame for each objective.

  • Assign person(s) to take the lead on internationalizing the program—some/all of faculty.

  • Select methods to achieve objectives—which activities: courses, extra-curricular, research, travel, international students, partner programs, etc.

  • Assign person(s) responsible for each objective.

  • Identify potential resources to support plans.

  • Obtain resources needed for plans.

  • Identify and address obstacles to fulfilling objectives.

Table 10.2 PEAK global competencies. (From Murray et al. 2013; Deardorff 2006)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Burke, B. (2014). Training and Retraining I-O Psychology Faculty for Internationalization. In: Griffith, R., Thompson, L., Armon, B. (eds) Internationalizing the Curriculum in Organizational Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9402-7_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics