Skip to main content

Bayesian Methods and Model Selection for Latent Growth Curve Models with Missing Data

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics ((PROMS,volume 66))

Abstract

With an increase in complexity of latent growth curve models (LGCMs), comes an increase in problems estimating the models. This research first proposes new growth models to address the perennial problems of almost all longitudinal research, namely, missing data. Different non-ignorable missingness models are formulated. These models include the latent coefficient (intercept or slope)-dependent missingness, in which the missing data rates vary across different latent individual initial levels or slopes; and the potential outcome-dependent missingness, in which the missing data rates on each occasion depend on potential outcomes. Second, this study proposes a full Bayesian approach to estimate the proposed LGCMs with non-ignorable missing data through data augmentation algorithm and Gibbs sampling procedure. And third, model selecting criteria are proposed in a Bayesian context to identify the best-fit model.Simulation studies were conducted. Conclusions include the proposed method can accurately recover model parameters, the mis-specified missingness may result in severely misleading conclusions, and almost all the model selection criteria can correctly identify the true model with high certainty. The application of the model and the method are illustrated with a longitudinal data set showing growth in mathematical ability. Finally, related implications of the approach and future research directions are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1919(6), 716–723.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Baraldi, A. N., & Enders, C. K. (2010). An introduction to modern missing data analyses. Journal of School Psychology, 48, 5–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew, D. J., & Knott, M. (1999). Latent variable models and factor analysis: Kendall’s library of statistics (2nd ed., Vol. 7). New York, NY: Edward Arnold.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K., & Curran, P. (2006). Latent curve models: A structural equation perspective. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Box, G. E. P., & Tiao, G. C. (1973). Bayesian inference in statistical analysis. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bozdogan, H. (1987). Model selection and Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC): The general theory and its analytical extensions. Psychometrika, 52, 345–370.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. (1997). National longitudinal survey of youth 1997 cohort, 1997–2003 (rounds 1–7). [computer file]. Produced by the National Opinion Research Center, the University of Chicago and distributed by the Center for Human Resource Research, The Ohio State University. Columbus, OH, 2005. Available from http://www.bls.gov/nls/nlsy97.htm

  • Celeux, G., Forbes, F., Robert, C., & Titterington, D. (2006). Deviance information criteria for missing data models. Bayesian Analysis, 4, 651–674.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, A. (1974). The direct use of likelihood for significance testing. In Proceedings of Conference on Foundational Questions in Statistical Inference (pp. 335–352). University of Aarhus: Aarhus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enders, C. K. (2011). Missing not at random models for latent growth curve analyses. Psychological Methods, 16, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzmaurice, G., Davidian, M., Verbeke, G., & Molenberghs, G. (Eds.). (2008). Longitudinal data analysis. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzmaurice, G. M., Laird, N. M., & Ware, J. H. (2004). Applied longitudinal analysis. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Geman, S., & Geman, D. (1984). Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 6, 721–741.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Geweke, J. (1992). Evaluating the accuracy of sampling-based approaches to calculating posterior moments. In J. M. Bernado, J. O. Berger, A. P. Dawid, & A. F. M. Smith (Eds.), Bayesian Statistics 4 (pp. 169–193). Oxford, UK: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glynn, R. J., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1986). Drawing inferences from self-selected samples. In H. Wainer (Ed.), (pp. 115–142). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, P. (1996). Robust statisticalprocedures (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: SIAM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, R., & De Boeck, P. (1999). Confirmatory analyses of componential test structure using multidimensional item response theory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 34, 245–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jelicic, H., Phelps, E., & Lerner, R. M. (2009). Use of missing data methods in longitudinal studies: The persistence of bad practices in developmental psychology. Developmental Psychology, 45, 1195–1199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. Y. (2007). Structural equation modeling: A Bayesian approach. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1987). Statistical analysis with missing data. New York, NY: Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley-Interscience.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, Z., Zhang, Z., & Lubke, G. (2011). Bayesian inference for growth mixture models with latent-class-dependent missing data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46, 567–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLachlan, G. J., & Peel, D. (2000). Finite mixture models. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Micceri, T. (1989). The unicorn, the normal curve and the other improbable creatures. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 156–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, B., & Asparouhov, T. (2012). Bayesian SEM: A more flexible representation of substantive theory. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 313–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oldmeadow, C., & Keith, J. M. (2011). Model selection in Bayesian segmentation of multiple DNA alignments. Bioinformatics, 27, 604–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rissanen, J. (1978). Modeling by shortest data description. Automatica, 14, 465–471.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Robert, C. P., & Casella, G. (2004). Monte Carlostatistical methods. New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, P. L. (1994). Missing data: A conceptual review for applied psychologists. Personnel Psychology, 47, 537–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, J. L. (1997). Analysisof incomplete multivariate data. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, G. E. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6 (2), 461–464.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sclove, L. S. (1987). Application of mode-selection criteria to some problems in multivariate analysis. Psychometrics, 52, 333–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spiegelhalter, D. J., Best, N. G., Carlin, B. P., & Van Der Linde, A. (2002). Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 64(4), 583–639.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Spiegelhalter, D. J., Thomas, A., Best, N., & Lunn, D. (2003). WinBUGS manual Version 1.4. (Cambridge CB2 2SR, UK: MRC Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Public Health, Robinson Way. http://www.mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk/bugs)

  • Sturtz, S., Ligges, U., & Gelman, A. (2005). R2WinBUGS: A package for running WinBUGS from R. Journal of Statistical Software, 12, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, M. A., & Wong, W. H. (1987). The calculation of posterior distributions by data augmentation. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82, 528–540.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, K.- H., & Lu, Z. (2008). SEM with missing data and unknown population using two-stage ML: Theory and its application. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 43, 621–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Z., Hamagami, F., Wang, L., Grimm, K. J., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2007). Bayesian analysis of longitudinal data using growth curve models. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31(4), 374–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhenqiu (Laura) Lu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lu, Z.(., Zhang, Z., Cohen, A. (2013). Bayesian Methods and Model Selection for Latent Growth Curve Models with Missing Data. In: Millsap, R.E., van der Ark, L.A., Bolt, D.M., Woods, C.M. (eds) New Developments in Quantitative Psychology. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 66. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9348-8_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics