Modeling of Environmental Protection

  • Natali Hritonenko
  • Yuri Yatsenko
Part of the Springer Optimization and Its Applications book series (SOIA, volume 88)


This chapter is devoted to analytic modeling of the relations between the economy, society, and the environment, with a focus on combating climate change. Section 11.1 describes simple models of these relationships and discusses mitigation and adaptation as two major human responses to environmental damage. Sections 11.2 and 11.3 investigate economic models with optimal investments into mitigation of environmental pollutions. Section 11.4 analyzes optimal investments into mitigation and adaptation against environmental damage. These economic–environmental models are formulated as social planner problems with mitigation and adaptation investments as separate variables. The steady-state analysis of optimal investments leads to essential implications for associated long-term environmental policies.


Utility Function Optimal Investment Environmental Adaptation Emission Abatement Abatement Effort 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Open image in new windowAckerman, F., Stanton, E.: Climate economics: The state of the art. Routledge Studies in Ecological Economics. Routledge, London, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Agrawala, S., Bosello, F., de Carraro, C., Cian, E., Lanzi, E.: Adapting to climate change: Costs, benefits, and modelling approaches. Int. Rev. Environ. Resource Econ. 5, 245–284 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Open image in new windowBréchet, T., Hritonenko, N., Yatsenko, Y.: Adaptation and mitigation in long-term climate policy. Environ. Resource Econ. 55, 217–243 (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Byrne, M.: Is growth a dirty word? Pollution, abatement and economic growth. J. Dev. Econ. 54, 261–284 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chimeli, A.B., Braden, J.B.: Total factor productivity and the environmental Kuznets curve. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 49, 366–380 (2005)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gradus, R., Smulders, S.: The trade-off between environmental care and long-term growth-pollution in three prototype models. J. Econ. 58, 25–51 (1993)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hritonenko, N., Yatsenko, Y.: Modeling of environmental adaptation: amenity vs. productivity and modernization. Clim. Change. Econ. 4:2, 1–24 (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC): Climate change 2007, fourth assessment report. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jørgensen, S., Martín-Herrán, G., Zaccour, G.: Dynamic games in the economics and management of pollution. Environ. Model. Assess. 15, 433–467 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Open image in new windowMcGuffie, K., Henderson-Sellers, A.: A climate modelling primer, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Smulders, S., Gradus, R.: Pollution abatement and long-term growth. Eur. J. Polit. Econ. 12, 505–532 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stokey, N.: Are there limits to growth? Int. Econ. Rev. 39, 1–31 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tahvonen, O., Kuuluvainen, J.: Economic growth, pollution and renewable resources. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 25, 101–118 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Natali Hritonenko
    • 1
  • Yuri Yatsenko
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of MathematicsPrairie View A&M UniversityPrairie ViewUSA
  2. 2.School of BusinessHouston Baptist UniversityHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations