Skip to main content

Enhanced End-Use Efficiency

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Physics of Societal Issues
  • 1149 Accesses

Abstract

Energy efficiency has been dubbed the sixth source of energy (Fig. 14.1). The other five sources of energy are coal, natural gas, petroleum, nuclear and renewable energy. This chapter is about energy success stories and potential success stories. Since the oil embargo, the United States has reduced its energy-use growth rate from 4.4 % per year (1960–1970) to almost zero, less than 1 % per year. The nation’s appetite for energy rose from 74 quads in 1973 to 100quads in 2004, a much smaller rise than the 1972 Atomic Energy Commission projected 160 quads for 2000. Electric power consumption actually grew by 2 % per year in the 1990s, reaching an average power of 430 GWe in 2012. This growth was also well below the 1972 Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) projection of 2,000 GWe for the year 2000. The reason energy demand didn’t match projections is because of the success of enhanced end-use efficiency. The United States saved 50 % of energy use on new autos (other than SUVs), houses and refrigerators since the oil embargo of 1973–1974. Appliance standards saved the building of 50 large power plants, which would have consumed 3 quads/year. Energy demand could be cut by another 50 % on new cars and houses, as it is being shown that these new-energy technologies are cost effective. Over a 10–20 year period, thicker insulation is cost effective, but it is far cheaper as installed on new construction, compared to retrofitting existing houses.

One Rosenfeld is a power rate of 3 billion kWh/year of electricity savings and 3 million metric tons/year of carbon dioxide emissions savings (equal to the generation and emissions from a typical coal-fired power plant). This lump of coal represents 60 pico-Rosenfeld years – the amount of electricity saved by a compact fluorescent lamp every 4 hours. In the early days, after the oil embargo, Henry Kelly defined 1 Art as 1 BTU/ft2-hour.

(“Defining a Standard Metric for Electricity Savings,” Environ. Res. Letters, March 9, 2010)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The transition from laminar flow to turbulent flow takes place at higher Reynold’s numbers,R = vL/η, where v is velocity of air,L is hole diameter, and h is viscosity, M. Sherman,AIPCP 133, 655–662 (1985).

  2. 2.

    Raising R values above R-3 (English) to R-5 and R-7 is less effective. The additional savings from raising R-0 to R-3,R-3 to R-5, and R-5 to R-7 were measured in several cities with these results: Phoenix (23 %/6 %/3 %), Washington, DC (18 %/6 %/3 %), Minneapolis (17 %/4 %/3 %) (Sherman and Walker, 1998; Sherman et al, 2000).

Bibliography

  • Akbari, H. (2008). Saving energy and improving air quality in urban heat islands,AIPCP 1044, 192–208.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. and J. Koomey (2003). Electricity use in California: Past trends and present usage patterns,Energy Policy 31, 849–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M., M.D. Levine, J.P. Romm, A. Rosenfeld and J. Koomey (1998). Engineering-economic studies of energy technologies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions (Five DOE Lab. Study),Ann. Rev. Energy Envi. 23, 287–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, E. (1986). Cogeneration: Efficient energy source,Ann. Rev. Energy Environ. 11, 275– 294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crabtree, G., et al. (2011). Integrating renewable electricity on the grid,AIPCP 1401, 387–405.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • de Beer, J., E. Worrell and K. Blok (1998). Future technologies for energy-efficient iron and steel making,Ann. Rev. Energy Environ. 23, 123–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DenBaars, S. (2008). Energy efficient white LEDs for sustainable solid state lighting,AIP 1044, 141–8.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Desroches, L. (2011). Appliance standards and advanced technologies,AIPCP 1401, 339–352.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, K., G.I. Rochlin, R.H. Socolow, et al. (1975).The Efficient Use of Energy,AIPCP, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldenberg, J., T. Johansson, A. Reddy and R. Williams (1985). End-use global energy strategy,Ann. Rev. Energy Environ. 10, 613–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gyuk, I. (2008). Energy Storage for a greener grid,AIPCP 1044, 376–392.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Hafemeister, D., H. Kelly and B. Levi (Eds.) (1985).Energy Sources: Conservation and Renewables,AIP 135.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Haves (2011). Energy simulation tools for buildings,AIPCP 1401, 313–327.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, E. (1997). Electric utilities in transition,Ann. Rev. Energy Environ. 22, 119–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiliccote, S., M. Piette and G. Ghatikar (2011). Smart buildings and demand response,AIPCP 1401, 328–338.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Kreith, F. and R. West (1997).CRC Handbook of Energy Efficiency, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, J. (2008). Appliances: Designs and standards for sustainability,AIPCP 1044, 124–140.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Meier, A. (2008). Standby energy in California Homes,AIPCP 1044, 209–216.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Lubell, M. and B. Richter (2011). Energy efficiency: Transportation and buildings,AIP 1401, 107–152.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • McLarnon, F. and E. Cairns (1989). Energy storage.Ann. Rev. Energy Environ. 14, 241–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier, A. (2008). Standby energy use in California homes,AIPCP 1044, 209–216.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, T. (2011). Energy on the home front,AIPCP 1401, 353–366.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Nadal, S. (2002). Energy end-use and conservation: Appliance and equipment standards,Ann. Rev. Energy Environ. 27, 159–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (2001).Energy Research at DOE: Was It Worth It, 1978-2000? NAS Press, Wash., DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Technology Assessment (1989).Electric Power Wheeling and Dealing, OTA, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———(1993).Industrial Energy Efficiency, OTA, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, D. (2010). The efficiency dilemma,New Yorker, 78–85 (Dec. 20, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, L. (2008). Technologies and policies to improve energy efficiency in industry,AIP 1044, 163–175.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. and M. Ross (1978). Some energy problem, problems and solutions,Phys. Teacher 16, 272–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, A. (1999). The art of energy efficiency,Ann. Rev. Energy Environ. 24, 33–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———(2011). California enhances energy efficiency,AIPCP 1401, 7–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, A., T. Kaarsberg and J. Romm (2002). Technologies to reduce carbon dioxide emissions,Phys. Today 53(11), 29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Selkowitz (2008). Progress towards highly efficient windows for zero-energy buildings, AIPCP 1044, 112–123.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, M. (1985). Air infiltration in buildings,AIPCP 135, 655–662.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, M. and I. Walker (1998). Can duct tape take the heat?Home Energy 15(4), 14–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, M., I. Walker and D. Dickerhoff (2000).Stopping Duct Quacks: Longevity of Residential Duct Sealants,Proc. 2000 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings, LBNL-45423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schipper, L., R. Hawarth and H. Geller (1990). US energy use from 1973 to 1987: The impact of improved efficiency,Ann. Rev. Energy Environ. 15, 455–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenung, S., J.M. Eyer, J.J. Iannucci and S. Horgan (1996). Energy storage for a competitive market,Ann. Rev. Energy Environ. 21, 347–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schewe, P. (2007).The Grid, Joseph Henry Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wald, M. (2010). How to build the supergrid,Scientific American, 57–61 (November 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolaway, J. (2008). Infrared technology trends and implications to home and building energy use efficiency,AIPCP 1044, 217–231.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Wray, C., et al. (2008). Heating ventilation and air conditioning,AIPCP 1044, 149–162.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Hafemeister .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hafemeister, D. (2014). Enhanced End-Use Efficiency. In: Physics of Societal Issues. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9272-6_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9272-6_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-9271-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-9272-6

  • eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics