Abstract
The use of interface and WWW by individual and organizations become an essential to enhance performance and job satisfaction, as these tools should be designed in an efficient way to prevent frustration and vexation among users.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson, J. R. (1993). Rules of the mind. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Card, S., Moran, T. P., & Newell, A. (1983). The psychology of human computer interaction Hillsdale. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hinesley, G. A. (2007). E-learning today: A review of research on hypertext comprehension. AACE Journal, 15(3), 255–265.
Kidder, D., Meyer, D., Mueller, S., & Seymour, T. (1999). Insights into working memory from the perspective of the EPIC architecture for modeling skilled perceptual-motor and cognitive human performance. In A. M. P. Shah (Ed.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 183–223). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kieras, D., & Meyer, D. (1997). An overview of the EPIC architecture for cognition and performance with application to human-computer interaction. Human Computer Interaction, 12, 391–438.
Meyer, D., Glass, J., Mueller, S., Seymour, T., & Kieras, D. (2001). Executive-process interactive control: A unified computational theory for answering 20 questions (and more) about cognitive ageing. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 13(1/2), 123–164.
Nielson, J., & Mack, R. L. (1994). Usability inspection methods. NY: Wiley.
Norman, D. (1993). Things that make us smart: Addison-Wesley.
Pirolli, P., & Card, S. K. (1999). Information foraging. Psychological Review, 106, 643–675.
Jennifer, P., Yvonne, R., & Helen, S. (2002). Interaction design: beyond human-computer interaction. New York: Wiley.
Helen, S., Yvonne, R., & Jennifer, P. (2011). Interaction design—beyond human-computer interaction. New York: Wiley.
Spink, A., & Cole, C. (2006). Human information behavior: Integrating diverse approaches and information use. Journal of American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(1), 25–35.
Trepess, D. (n.d.). Information foraging theory. Retrieved 1 June 2014, from http://www.interaction-design.org/encyclopedia/information_foraging_theory.html
Veredenburg, K., Mao, J., Smith, P. W., & Carey, T. (2002). A survey of user-centered design practice. In Paper presented at the CHI 02, Proceedings of the SIGHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
Whitechill, J. (n.d.). Understanding ACT-R—an outsider’s perspective. Retrieved 1 June 2014, from http://mplab.ucsd.edu/~jake/actr.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Isaias, P., Issa, T. (2015). Usability Evaluation Models. In: High Level Models and Methodologies for Information Systems. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9254-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9254-2_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-9253-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-9254-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)