Skip to main content

Presumptive Criminals: U.S. Criminal Law and HIV-Related Aggravated Assaults

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

In choosing to criminalize the attempted spread of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), several United States jurisdictions not only ignore the public health harms associated with their draconian approach, but also commit logical and due process errors in their prosecutions, thus discriminating against the HIV-positive population. In this chapter, I consider a common case where jurisdictions use aggravated assault—an assault by means likely to produce grievous bodily harm or death. By looking at several cases in depth, I show that certain courts use a guilt-by-association rule, sweeping in all HIV-positive individuals under the criminal law regardless of the likelihood of transmission, which is a key element in any aggravated assault charge. Many courts do not distinguish between those who have high viral loads and those who virtually cannot transmit the disease at all—namely, those who are on highly active antiretroviral therapy, have an undetectable viral load, use condoms, and have no sexually transmitted infections. The chapter concludes by highlighting the discriminatory effect of criminalization.

Ari Ezra Waldman, Associate Director, Institute for Information Law and Policy, New York Law School; Ph.D. Candidate, Columbia University; J.D., Harvard Law School; A.B., magna cum laude, Harvard College.

A version of this chapter was originally published as an article at Ari Ezra Waldman, Exceptions: The Criminal Law’s Illogical Approach to HIV-Related Aggravated Assaults, 18 Va. J. L. & Soc. Poly 552 (2011). It has been used with permission. It also includes excerpts from Ari Ezra Waldman, Ask a Lawyer: The Injustice of HIV Criminalization, BETA Blog, May 3, 2013, at http://betablog.org/ask-a-lawyer-the-injustice-of-hiv-criminalization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank The Honorable Scott W. Stucky, Associate Judge of the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, and James A. Young, Chief Commissioner in Judge Stucky’s chambers, for advice and support in writing the original article. Special thanks to the faculty at California Western School of Law and the Faculty Development Committee for providing essential feedback and an opportunity to workshop the arguments contained herein.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ari Ezra Waldman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Waldman, A.E. (2014). Presumptive Criminals: U.S. Criminal Law and HIV-Related Aggravated Assaults. In: Peterson, D., Panfil, V. (eds) Handbook of LGBT Communities, Crime, and Justice. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9188-0_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics