Skip to main content

The German Genocides and Subsequent Redress and Reparation Movements

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1496 Accesses

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Transitional Justice ((SSTJ,volume 7))

Abstract

Chapter 4 briefly examines the German genocides where the Nazis systematically murdered an estimated 11 million civilians; of whom 6 million were European Jews and approximately half to one and a half million European Roma. The chapter then moves to examine the two subsequent redress and reparation movements (RRMs).

The initial concerns of the movement were to ensure that the proper response to the crimes perpetrated by the Nazi regime were implemented, including the return of stolen goods and property (restitution) and damages due to imprisonment (compensation). Each victim group attempted to mobilize in order for their claims to be recognized and victimhood established. The first step was to create legal structures that would address Nazi crimes. Once redress and reparation organizations succeeded with their goals, a legal precedent had been established.

The Jewish RRM is the most well-known; it emerged first, having mobilized towards the beginning of World War II, with norm entrepreneurs and elite allies both internationally and domestically. The Romani RRM is less well known and has been described as forgotten in historical memory. Norm entrepreneurs for Romani victims have struggled for recognition and sustained mobilization, with inclusion in redress and reparation coming decades later.

This fight for redress and reparations are central to this book, as the concept of individual reparations to those victimized was unprecedented. Both RRMs will be explored and analyzed including key differences in mobilization, recognition, and achievement of redress.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The casualty figures selected reflect the understood death tolls of each group. For example, it is generally accepted that approximately 6 million Jewish civilians died during the Holocaust, although precise number vary according to methodology. Hilberg (2003) estimates 5.1 million Jews were killed. Dawidowicz (1986) estimates 5.93 million killed. Well-known memorials such as the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum (USHMM) and Yad Vashem utilize the commonly accepted figure of 6 million.

    Estimates for the Roma vary drastically and there does not seem to be a consensus regarding the casualty figures. I have chosen to utilize half a million to one and a half million. Half million seems to be the number most commonly cited by Roma. Von dem Knesebeck 2011 reports that estimates range from 90,000 to 500,000. Hancock (2004) estimates half a million to one and a half million killed. Various individuals also gave these estimates from the US Holocaust Memorial Museum and the International Organization for Migration. As Chapter One mentioned: there have many terms utilized to describe the Roma—historically they have been called “Gypsies”—in the post-World War II era; however, Gypsy is often seen to be a derogatory term. Various scholars utilize Gypsy, Roma, Rom, or Romani to identify the group. Within Germany the common phrase in Roma and Sinti, reflecting the two largest sub-groups within their territorial borders. International society seems to be arriving at Roma (plural for man) in recent scholarship. For the purpose of this book, Roma will refer to the group ethnicity and Romani as an adjective. See Vermeersch (2007, pp. 10–11) for further discussion on terminology.

  2. 2.

    In addition to committing genocide upon Jews and Roma, the Nazi Regime committed acts that, today, would be classified as crimes against humanity towards homosexuals, Jehovah’s Witnesses, and the disabled. An examination of RRMs relating to those groups, however, is currently outside the scope of this book.

  3. 3.

    Von dem Knesebeck(2011, p. 2).

  4. 4.

    Nationality denotes one’s membership in the nation or state, whereas citizenship denotes a legal status and political rights within the state. It is common for one to be both a citizen and a national; however these are two separate concepts. Citizenship, in theory, denotes a legal equality among its members.

  5. 5.

    Constitution of the German Empire (April 16, 1871).

  6. 6.

    Nathans (2004, pp. 179–181). The objection had to be based “only on facts such as justify the fear that the naturalisation of the applicant would imperil the welfare of the Empire or the State.” German Imperial and State Citizenship Law, July 22, 1913, Article 9, p. 219.

  7. 7.

    See Nathans, The Politics of Citizenship in Germany for a discussion on the racial/national preference hierarchy within Germany.

  8. 8.

    Brenner (1997, pp. 301–302).

  9. 9.

    Ibid. p. 280.

  10. 10.

    As Roma traditionally had nomadic lifestyles, the German Empire was attempting to force those nomadic Roma to either leave the territory or settle into one place and give up the traveling lifestyle. The terminology nomadic versus sedentary was often utilized to make distinctions between the Roma who had settled into a permanent home versus those without permanent residence, or who frequently travelled between locales.

  11. 11.

    Fraser (1992, pp. 249–250).

  12. 12.

    Ibid. p. 253.

  13. 13.

    Liegeois (1986, p. 92).

  14. 14.

    Fraser (1992, pp. 251–252).

  15. 15.

    Liegeois (1986, p. 92).

  16. 16.

    Sparing (1997, p. 40).

  17. 17.

    Longerich (2003, p. 29).

  18. 18.

    Girard (1980, p. 75).

  19. 19.

    Friedlander (2003, pp. 96–99).

  20. 20.

    The Program of the NSDAP (1920).

  21. 21.

    Ibid.

  22. 22.

    The Constitution of the German Reich (1919).

  23. 23.

    Heuss (1997, p. 23).

  24. 24.

    Fraser (1992, p. 252).

  25. 25.

    The Reichstag fire was an arsonist fire which occurred at the Parliament. The fire’s origins have been long disputed as to whether the arsonist, Marinus van der Lubb, acted alone, acted in conjunction with Communists, or if the fire was planned by the Nazi’s to seize power.

  26. 26.

    Article 48, Paragraph 2 “The Reich President may, if the public safety and order in the German Reich are considerably disturbed or endangered, take such measures as are necessary to restore public safety and order. If necessary he may intervene with the help of the armed forces. For this purpose he may temporarily suspend, either partially or wholly, the Fundamental Rights established in Articles 114, 115, 117, 118, 123, 124 and 153.” “The Constitution of the German Reich, August 11, 1919.”

  27. 27.

    Joseph V. O’Brian (n.d) The Decrees of 1933. Retrieved November 18, 2005 from John Jay College of Criminal Justice Web Site: http://web.jjay.cuny.edu/~jobrien/reference/ob60.html. The full Decree can be found on the following website: The Adolf Hitler Historical Archives (n.d.) Decree of the Reich President for the Protection of People and State, http://www.adolfhitler.ws/lib/proc/decree330228.html, accessed on November 18, 2005.

  28. 28.

    Fein (1979, p. 19).

  29. 29.

    Kenrick and Puxon (1972, p. 59).

  30. 30.

    Arad et al. (1999, pp. 78–79).

  31. 31.

    Ibid. p. 77.

  32. 32.

    Ibid.

  33. 33.

    Ibid. p. 80.

  34. 34.

    Quoted in Kenrick and Puxon (1972, p. 59).

  35. 35.

    Fraser (1992, p. 257).

  36. 36.

    The decree also incorrectly established six main tribes: Sinti, Rom, Gelderari, Lowari, Lalleri, and Balkan Roma. Himmler recommended that the Lalleri and Sinti which made up 10 % of the Romani population to be spared; however, Himmler’s recommendation was ignored. Ibid. p. 259.

  37. 37.

    “The Number of Victims,” http://en.auschwitz.org.pl/h/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=14&Itemid=13&limit=1&limitstart=1, accessed on March 10, 2011.

  38. 38.

    Dönitz (1997, p. 449).

  39. 39.

    Dönitz was sentenced to ten years in prison.

  40. 40.

    Declaration Regarding the Defeat of Germany and the Assumption of Supreme Authority by Allied Powers.

  41. 41.

    Timm (1997, p. 8).

  42. 42.

    Sagi (1986, p. 7).

  43. 43.

    Gottlieb (1950, p. 22).

  44. 44.

    Sagi (1986, p. 8).

  45. 45.

    Inter-Allied Declaration against Acts of Dispossession committed in Territories under Enemy Occupation of Control.

  46. 46.

    “Joint Four-Nation Declaration”

  47. 47.

    Gareau (1961, p. 518).

  48. 48.

    About the WJC (2010).

  49. 49.

    Sagi (1986, p. 2).

  50. 50.

    Ibid. p. 1.

  51. 51.

    Ibid. p. 23.

  52. 52.

    Ibid. pp. 23–24.

  53. 53.

    Ibid. pp. 31–32.

  54. 54.

    Ibid. p. 32.

  55. 55.

    Ibid. p. 2.

  56. 56.

    Ibid.

  57. 57.

    Ibid. pp. 2–3.

  58. 58.

    Ibid. p. 35.

  59. 59.

    Agreement on Reparation From Germany, on the Establishment of an Inter-Allied Reparation Agency and on the Restitution of Monetary Gold, (Paris, January 14, 1946).

  60. 60.

    Sagi (1986, p. 35).

  61. 61.

    Ibid.

  62. 62.

    Von dem Knesebeck (2011, pp. 7–8).

  63. 63.

    Pross (1998, p. 19).

  64. 64.

    Otto Küster is considered to be one of the founders of the reparations movement. A German Protestant and judge, he was dismissed from his position in the fall of 1933 for his ‘rejection of Nazi leadership.’ He strongly supported restitution and reparation for the Jewish community, he was appointed as the Württemberg state commissioner for reparations in 1947, assisted with the drafting of Allied restitution laws, and early drafts of the German laws. Küster was also involved in the Freiburger Rundbrief Group, an organization of Catholics and Protestants working towards reconciliation between Germans and Jews. Pross (1998, p. 4).

  65. 65.

    Ibid. footnote 3, p. 228.

  66. 66.

    Quoted in Pross (1998, p. 19).

  67. 67.

    Ibid. p. 20.

  68. 68.

    Von dem Knesebeck (2011, pp. 7–8).

  69. 69.

    Colonomos and Armstrong (2006, p. 392).

  70. 70.

    Takei (2002, p. 266).

  71. 71.

    The Jewish Agency, the AJDC, American Jewish Committee, the World Jewish Congress, the Agudath Israel World Organization, the Board of Deputies of British Jews, the Central British Fund, the Council for the Protection of the Rights and Interests of the Jews from Germany, the Central Committee of Rights and Interests of the Jews from Germany, the Conseil représentatif des juifs de France, Jewish Cultural Reconstruction Inc., the Anglo-Jewish Association, and the Interessenvertretung israelitischer Kulturgemeinden.

  72. 72.

    Sagi (1986, p. 41).

  73. 73.

    Ibid.

  74. 74.

    Pross (1998, p. 4); United Restitution Organization (2011).

  75. 75.

    Pross (1998, p. 11).

  76. 76.

    Aliyah Statistics 1948.

  77. 77.

    See Timm (1997).

  78. 78.

    Pross (1998, p. 22).

  79. 79.

    The day after Israel declared independence; neighboring states attacked launching the 1948 Arab-Israeli War. In addition, Israel had to bear the costs of establishing a new state and the massive influx of Jewish immigrants, many who were Holocaust survivors and suffering from mental and physical problems. Israel thus was in a perilous position following its creation, as it was weakened both financially and militarily.

  80. 80.

    Sagi (1986, p. 51).

  81. 81.

    Ibid. p. 52.

  82. 82.

    Ibid. p. 56.

  83. 83.

    Ibid. p. 64.

  84. 84.

    Ibid. p. 65.

  85. 85.

    Ibid. pp. 68–69.

  86. 86.

    Ibid. p. 69.

  87. 87.

    Ibid. p. 70.

  88. 88.

    Pross (1998, p. 22).

  89. 89.

    Ibid. pp. 22–23.

  90. 90.

    Colonomos and Armstrong (2006, p. 394).

  91. 91.

    Pross (1998, p. 21).

  92. 92.

    Quoted in Pross (1998, p. 21).

  93. 93.

    Quoted in Pross (1998, p. 21).

  94. 94.

    Müller (1991, p. 205).

  95. 95.

    Sagi (1986, p. 32). Over 100,000 people were in the displaced persons camps as of 1945.

  96. 96.

    Ibid. p. 3.

  97. 97.

    Ibid.

  98. 98.

    Ibid.

  99. 99.

    Luxembourg Agreement and Associated Documents [Excerpts] (2006, p. 886).

  100. 100.

    Pross (1998, p. 30).

  101. 101.

    Honig (1954, p. 578).

  102. 102.

    “Luxembourg Agreement and Associated Documents [Excerpts],” (2006, p. 890).

  103. 103.

    For an analysis of this reparations programs and the application of this program, see Pross (1998).

  104. 104.

    Pross (1998, p. 3).

  105. 105.

    Ibid.

  106. 106.

    Pross credits the most influential allies as Walter Schwarz, Kurt May, Otto Küster, Frank Böhm, Adolf Arndt, and Martin Hirsch.

  107. 107.

    Pross (1998, p. 7).

  108. 108.

    Ibid. p. 36.

  109. 109.

    Fritz Schäffer was known to have made anti-Semitic speeches and expressed support for the Nazi ideology before 1922; however, he was also opposed to the Nazi party later and imprisoned in Dachau for three months for connections to the attempted assassination of Hitler in the July 20 plot. He was appointed Prime Minister of Bavaria in the US occupied zone, but removed for being a Nazi sympathizer and of obstructing the denazification process. He was cleared of these charged in a later denazification process. His policies as Finance Minister, however, show that he was against reparations.

  110. 110.

    Compensation for National Socialist Injustice (2009, p. 7).

  111. 111.

    Pross (1998, p. 39).

  112. 112.

    Ibid. pp. 39–40.

  113. 113.

    Quoted in Pross (1998, p. 40).

  114. 114.

    Pross (1998, p. 43).

  115. 115.

    Ibid. p. 45.

  116. 116.

    Ibid. p. 46.

  117. 117.

    All three reparation laws were abbreviated and referred to as BEG.

  118. 118.

    Compensation for National Socialist Injustice (2009, p. 7).

  119. 119.

    Ibid. p. 8.

  120. 120.

    Kritz (1995, p. 50).

  121. 121.

    Ibid.

  122. 122.

    Ibid.

  123. 123.

    Wippermann (2006, p. 171).

  124. 124.

    Hancock (1991a, p. 143).

  125. 125.

    Von dem Knesebeck (2011)

  126. 126.

    Ibid. especially chaps. 3, 4 & 7.

  127. 127.

    Ibid. pp. 73–98.

  128. 128.

    Crowe (2000, p. 198).

  129. 129.

    Quoted in Gilbert (1989, p. 734).

  130. 130.

    Wippermann (2006, p. 175).

  131. 131.

    “By decree of the Reichsführer SS dated December 16, 1942- […] Gypsy half-breeds, Romany gypsies and members of their non-German blood relative clans from the Balkans shall swiftly be deported to a concentration camp according to certain instructions. […] The deportation to the concentration camp (Gypsy camp) Auschwitz will take place regardless of the family degree of mixed blood.” Himmler (1942).

  132. 132.

    Saathoff (2011, p. x).

  133. 133.

    Crowe (2000, p. 198).

  134. 134.

    Von dem Knesebeck (2011, p. 96).

  135. 135.

    Quoted in Von dem Knesebeck (2011, p. 80).

  136. 136.

    Von dem Knesebeck (2011, pp. 118–119).

  137. 137.

    Quoted in Wippermann (2006, p. 174).

  138. 138.

    Von dem Knesebeck (2011, p. 123).

  139. 139.

    Milton (1998, p. 39).

  140. 140.

    Hancock (1991b, p. 16).

  141. 141.

    Von dem Knesebeck (2011, p. 124).

  142. 142.

    Wippermann (2006, p. 176).

  143. 143.

    Von dem Knesebeck (2006, p. 65).

  144. 144.

    Milton (1998, p. 39).

  145. 145.

    Von dem Knesebeck (2011, p. 67).

  146. 146.

    Some scholars such as Barany (2002, p. 265) credit 1982 as when Roma received full recognition. Quote from: Chronology of the Genocide of Roma and Sinti, http://www.stiftung-denkmal.de/en/memorials/memorial-to-the-sinti-and-roma-murdered-unter-the-national-socialist-regime/chronology-of-the-genocide-of-the-sinti-and-roma.html, accessed June 12, 2013.

  147. 147.

    Von dem Knesebeck (2011, p. 227) credits this as when Roma received full recognition. Quoted from: Chronology of the Genocide of Roma and Sinti, http://www.stiftung-denkmal.de/en/memorials/memorial-to-the-sinti-and-roma-murdered-unter-the-national-socialist-regime/chronology-of-the-genocide-of-the-sinti-and-roma.html, accessed June 12, 2013.

  148. 148.

    Simon Wiesenthal Center (2011).

  149. 149.

    Cote (2009).

  150. 150.

    Grieshaber (2010).

  151. 151.

    Kritz (1995, p. 33).

  152. 152.

    For a more thorough accounting of the Nuremberg Trials see Davidson (1966).

  153. 153.

    Herf (1997, p. 6).

  154. 154.

    Ibid.

  155. 155.

    Ibid.

  156. 156.

    Ibid. p. 207.

  157. 157.

    This discrepancy can be partially explained by simply examining numbers—estimates indicate that 6 million Jews were killed compared to the half to one and a half million Roma.

  158. 158.

    Sander (2006).

  159. 159.

    The gypsy camp was a separate barracks within Auschwitz. König’s judgement was never finalized due to his subsequent suicide after hearing the verdict. Ibid. p. 151.

  160. 160.

    Ibid.

  161. 161.

    Ibid.

  162. 162.

    Ibid. p. 161.

  163. 163.

    Ibid. p. 158.

  164. 164.

    Ibid. p. 153.

  165. 165.

    Ibid. p. 163.

  166. 166.

    Ibid. p. 152.

  167. 167.

    Ibid.

  168. 168.

    It has been noted that Simon Wiesenthal is a controversial figure. Inconsistencies in his work suggest that as far as his own personal biography he would exaggerate claims, however, his work towards researching and bringing to justice Nazi war criminals is well documented, and as the subject of multiple documentaries, interviews, honors, and books he is the single most well-known Nazi Hunter in history.

  169. 169.

    About Simon Wiesenthal (2011).

  170. 170.

    Operation Last Chance: Bringing Nazi War Criminals to Justice (2011).

  171. 171.

    Operation Last Chance (2011).

  172. 172.

    Bazyler (2010, p. 1).

  173. 173.

    Ibid.

  174. 174.

    See Table 4.9: Denial of Roma Memory and/or Reparations for both German and other denials. In addition, this claim is based on informal interviews in Berlin—January 2009.

  175. 175.

    See Young (1993, 2000).

  176. 176.

    Holocaust Memorials; (2011).

  177. 177.

    Brooks (1999, p. 17).

  178. 178.

    See Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany, http://www.claimscon.org, accessed on March 16, 2010.

  179. 179.

    Von dem Knesebeck (2011, p. 65).

  180. 180.

    In this particular case, the norm entrepreneurs were individuals and organizations who were familiar with the persecution in Germany, often refugees and emigrants themselves, who fled and had been subjected to the so-called flight taxes and seizure of property by the German government.

  181. 181.

    See Brooks (1999) and Forced Labour Compensation Programme, Germany (2011).

  182. 182.

    Von dem Knesebeck (2011, p. 17).

  183. 183.

    Kritz (1995, p. 50).

  184. 184.

    Von dem Knesebeck (2011, pp. 74, 84).

  185. 185.

    For example in 2010, large-scale deportations of Roma were carried out in France. Willsher (2010).

  186. 186.

    Hancock (1999, p. 74).

Bibliography

  • About Simon Wiesenthal. 2011. Simon Wiesenthal Center. http://www.kintera.org/site/pp.asp?c=fwLYKnN8LzHb=242614. Accessed May 7, 2011.

  • About the WJC. 2010. World Jewish Congress. http://www.worldjewishcongress.org/en/about. Accessed July 18, 2010.

  • Agreement on Reparation From Germany, on the Establishment of an Inter-Allied Reparation Agency and on the Restitution of Monetary Gold. Paris. Jan. 14, 1946.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aliyah Statistics 1948—November 1948–November 2009 (Selected Countries). 2011. Jewish Agency for Israel, http://jewishagency.org/JewishAgency/English/About/Press+Room/Aliyah+Statistics/nov30.htm. Accessed March 15, 2011.

  • Arad, Yitzhak, Israel Gutman, and Abraham Margaliot, eds. 1999. Documents on the Holocaust: Selected sources on the destruction of the Jews of Germany and Austria, Poland, and the Soviet Union. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barany, Zoltan. 2002. The East European Gypsies: Regime change, marginality, and ethnopolitics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazyler, Michael J., Holocaust denial laws, and other legislation criminalizing promotion of Nazism. Insights and perspectives from Holocaust researches and historians. Yad Vashem. http://www1.yadvashem.org/yv/en/holocaust/insights/podcast/holocaust_denial_laws.asp. Accessed Dec. 28, 2010.

  • Berg, Stefan. 2010. A project in jeopardy: The unending battle over Berlin’s Sinti and Roma Memorial. Spiegal. December 28, 2010. http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,736716,00.html. Accessed Jan. 2, 2011.

  • Bock, Gisela. 1983. Racism and sexism in Nazi Germany: Motherhood, compulsory sterilization and the state. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 8:3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, Michael. 1997. Between revolution and legal equality. In German-Jewish history in modern times: Volume 2: Emancipation and acculturation 1780–1871, ed. Michael A. Meyer. New York: Colombia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, Roy L. 1999. A reparations success story? In When sorry isn’t enough: The controversy over apologies and reparations for human injustices, ed. Roy L. Brooks. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colonomos, Ariel, and Andrea Armstrong. 2006. German reparations to the Jews after World War II: A turning point in the history of reparations. In The handbook of reparations, ed. Pablo de Greiff. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Compensation for National Socialist Injustice. 2009. Federal Ministry of Finance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Compensation for National Socialist Injustice. 2011. Federal Ministry of Finance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constitution of the German Empire. April 16, 1871.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constitution of the German Reich. August 11, 1919. The Avalon Project at Yale Law School. http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/imt/document/nca_vol4/2050-ps.htm. Accessed Nov. 18, 2005.

  • Cote, Kevin. 2009. New trial for Nazi war crimes suspect? Times. April 6, 2009. http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1889380,00.html. Accessed March 10, 2009.

  • Crowe, David M. 2000. The Roma Holocaust. In The Holocaust’s ghost: Writings on art, politics, law and education, ed. F. C. Decoste and Bernard Schwartz, 179–202. Alberta: University of Alberta Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, Eugene. 1966. The trial of the Germans: An account of the twenty-two defendants before the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawidowicz, Lucy. 1986. The war against the Jews, 1933–1945. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Declaration Regarding the Defeat of Germany and the Assumption of Supreme Authority by Allied Powers. Avalon Project, http://avalon.law.yale.edu/wwii/ger01.asp. Accessed March 10, 2011.

  • Dönitz, Karl. 1958. Memoirs: Ten years and twenty days. (Translated by R. H. Stevens. Da Capo Press ed. 1997). New York: Da Capo Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fein, Helen. 1979. Accounting for genocide: National responses and Jewish victimization during the Holocaust. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forced Labour Compensation Programme, Germany. 2011. International Organization for Migration. http://www.iom.int/jahia/Jahia/activities/by-theme/reparation-programmes/forced-labour-compensation-programme. Accessed May 1, 2011.

  • Fraser, Angus. 1992. The Gypsies. Oxford: Blackwell Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedlander, Henry. 2003. The origins of the Nazi genocide. In The Holocaust: Theoretical readings, ed. Neil Levi and Michael Rothberg. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gareau, Frederick H. 1961. Morgenthau’s plan for industrial disarmament in Germany. The Western Political Quarterly 14 (2): 517–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • German Imperial and State Citizenship Law, July 22, 1913. The American Journal of International Law, Supplement: Official Documents 8 (3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, Martin. 1989. The Second World War: A complete history. New York: Henry Holt and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girard, Patrick. 1980. Historical foundations of anti-semitism. In Survivors, victims, and perpetrators: Essays on the Nazi Holocaust, ed. Joel E. Dimsdale, 55–77. Washington: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, Manuel. 1950. The reparations problem again. The Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science 16 (1): 22–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grieshaber, Kirsten. 2011. Samuel Kunz, Nazi suspect, indicted in Germany. Huffington Post, July 28, 2010. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/07/28/samuel-kunz-nazi-suspect-_n_661912.html. Accessed April 22, 2011.

  • Hancock, Ian. 1991a. The East European roots of Romani nationalism. In The Gypsies of Eastern Europe, ed. David Crowe and John Kolsti. London: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, Ian. 1991b. Gypsy history in Germany and neighboring lands: A chronology leading to the Holocaust and beyond. In The Gypsies of Eastern Europe, ed. David Crowe and John Kolsti. London: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, Ian. Romani history in Germany and neighboring lands. The Patrin Web Journal: Romani Culture and History. http://www.radoc.net/radoc.php?doc=art_e_holocaust_chronology&lang=en&articles=true. Accessed April 10, 2009.

  • Hancock, Ian. 1999. Romani victims of the Holocaust and Swiss complicity. In When sorry isn’t enough: The controversy over apologies and reparations for human injustices, ed. Roy L. Brooks. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, Ian. 2004. Romanies and the Holocaust: A reevaluation and overview. In The historiography of the Holocaust, ed. Dan Stone. New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herf, Jeffrey. 1997. Divided memory: The Nazi past in the two Germanys. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuss, Herbert. 1997. German policies of Gypsy persecution (1870–1945). In FromRace Science to the camps: The Gypsies during the Second World War, Vol. 1. ed Gypsy Research Centre of the Universite Rene Descartes. Hertfordshire: University of Hertfordshire Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilberg, Raul. 2003. The destruction of European Jews. 3rd ed. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Himmler, Heinrich. 1942. Auschwitz Decree. December 12, 1942. ITS document 82342515. http://www.its-arolsen.org/en/research-and-education/historical-background/anniversaries/index.html?expand=7410&cHash=b293211418d8d739f1f731cde9191ddc. Accessed June 18, 2013.

  • Holocaust Memorials. 2011. Topography of Terror Foundation. http://www.memorial-museums.net. Accessed April 15, 2011.

  • Honig, Frederick. 1954. The reparations agreement between Israel and the Federal Republic of Germany. The American Journal of International Law 48 (4): 564–78 (Oct 1954).

    Google Scholar 

  • Inter-Allied Declaration against Acts of Dispossession committed in Territories under Enemy Occupation of Control. Commission for Looted Art in Europe. http://www.lootedartcommission.com/inter-allied-declaration. Accessed March 11, 2011.

  • Jewish Successor Organizations. Jewish Virtual Library. http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/judaica/ejud_0002_0011_0_10155.html. Accessed March 20, 2011.

  • Joint Four-Nation Declaration, the Moscow Conference, October 1943. The Avalon Project at Yale Law School. http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/wwii/moscow.htm. Accessed March 5, 2007.

  • Kenrick, Donald and Grattan Puxon. 1972. The destiny of Europe’s Gypsies. London: Sussex University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kritz, Neil, ed. 1995. Transitional Justice: How Emerging Democracies Reckon with Former Regimes Three vols. Vol. Two, Transitional Justice. Washington DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law Against Overcrowding of German Schools and Higher Institutions of 25 April 1933. The Avalon Project at Yale University. http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/imt/document/nca_vol4/2022-ps.htm. Accessed Nov. 19, 2005.

  • Liegeois, Jean Pierre. 1986. Gypsies: An illustrated history. London: Al Saqi Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longerich, Peter. 2003. The unwritten order: Hitler’s role in the final solution. Stroud: Tempus Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luxembourg Agreement and Associated Documents [Excerpts]. 2006. In The handbook of reparations. ed. Pablo De Greiff. Oxford: Oxford University of Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milton, Sybil. 1998. Persecuting the survivors: The continuity of ‘Anti-Gypsyism’ in postwar Germany and Austria. In Sinti and Roma: Gypsies in German-Speaking Society and Literature, ed. Susan Tebbutt. New York: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, Ingo. 1991. Hitler’s justice: The courts of the Third Reich. (Translated by Deborah Lucas Schneider). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nathans, Eli. 2004. The politics of citizenship in Germany: Ethnicity, utility and nationalism. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nobles, Melissa. 2008. The politics of official apologies. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Operation Last Chance. 2011. Simon Wiesenthal Center. http://www.operationlastchance.org/Countries.htm. Accessed April 22, 2011.

  • Operation Last Chance: Bringing Nazi War Criminals to Justice. Simon Wiesenthal Center. http://www.wiesenthal.com/site/apps/s/content.asp?c=lsKWLbPJLnFb=4442915ct=5852219. Accessed April 22, 2011.

  • Program of the NSDAP, proclaimed 24 February 1920. The Avalon Project at Yale Law School. http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/imt/document/nca_vol4/1708-ps.htm. Accessed Sept. 8, 2008.

  • Pross, Christian. 1998. Paying for the past: The struggle over reparations for surviving victims of the Nazi terror. (Translated by Belinda Cooper). Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagi, Nana. 1986. German reparations: A history of the negotiations. New York City: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saathoff, Günter. 2011. Introduction to the Roma struggle in post-war Germany, by Julia Von dem Knesebeck. Hatfield: University of Hertfordshire Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sander, Peter. 2006. Criminal justice following the genocide of the Sinti and Roma, translated by Bill Templer. In The Gypsies during the Second World War: The final chapter, Vol. 3. ed. Donald Kenrick. Hertfordshire: University of Hertfordshire Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon Wiesenthal Center, 36 Questions About the Holocaust. Museum of Tolerance Multimedia Learning Center. http://motlc.wiesenthal.com/site/pp.asp?c=gvKVLcMVIuG&b=394663#35. Accessed March 15, 2011.

  • Sparing, Frank. 1997. The Gypsy camps. In Fromrace science to the camps: The Gypsies during the Second World War volume I, edited by Gypsy Research Centre of the Universite Rene Descartes. Hertfordshire: University of Hertfordshire Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takei, Ayaka. 2002. The “Gemeinde problem”: The Jewish restitution successor organization and the postwar Jewish communities in Germany, 1947–1954. Holocaust and Genocide Studies 16 (2): 266–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timm, Angelika. 1997. Jewish claims against East Germany: Moral obligations and pragmatic policy. Budapest: Central European University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Restitution Organization. 2011. Jewish Virtual Library. http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/judaica/ejud_0002_0020_0_20210.html. Accessed March 15, 2011.

  • U.S. and Allied Efforts to Recover and Restore Gold and Other Assets Stolen or Hidden by Germany During World War II. University of the West of England. http://www.ess.uwe.ac.uk/documents/tables.htm. Accessed April 1, 2011.

  • Vermeersch, Peter. 2007. The Romani movement: Minority politics & ethnic mobilization in contemporary central Europe. New York: Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von dem Knesebeck, Julia. 2011. The Roma struggle in post-war Germany. Hatfield: University of Hertfordshire Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willsher, Kim. 2010. France’s deportation of Roma shown to be illegal in leaked memo, say critics. Guardian, September 13, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wippermann, Wolfgang. 2006. Compensation withheld: The denial of reparations to the Sinti and Roma, translated by Bill Templer. In The Gypsies during the Second World War: The final chapter, Vol. 3, ed. Donald Kenrick. Hertfordshire: University of Hertfordshire Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, James E. 2000. At memory’s edge: After-images of the Holocaust in contemporary art and architecture. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, James E. 1993. Holocaust memorials and meaning. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephanie Wolfe .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wolfe, S. (2014). The German Genocides and Subsequent Redress and Reparation Movements. In: The Politics of Reparations and Apologies. Springer Series in Transitional Justice, vol 7. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9185-9_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics