Psychoacoustics and Auditory Perception

  • William A. Yost
Part of the Springer Handbook of Auditory Research book series (SHAR, volume 50)


Psychoacoustics and auditory perception are the study of the relationship between perception and the acoustic signal. The current methods and theories of psychoacoustics and auditory perception are probably derived from the early work of Fechner. The history of these studies can perhaps be divided into several major time periods: The Dominance of Helmholtz (late 19th century into early 20th century), The Bell Lab Years (late 1920s to the late 1940s), The Influence of the Theory of Signal Detection (1950s through the 1970s), Appreciation of Complex Sounds (1970s to late 1980s), and Auditory Scene Analysis (1990s to the present time). This chapter suggests that the next topic that will characterize the study of psychoacoustics and auditory perception will be the “Auditory Brain.” The chapter argues that understanding the Auditory Brain will depend on better understanding psychoacoustics and auditory perception, just as much as it will on understanding the biology of the brain. Two examples—sound source localization and complex pitch perception—indicate problems of auditory perception that remain to be solved. The chapter suggests that a better understanding of these areas will likely depend on additional work both in auditory psychoacoustics/perception and in auditory neuroscience.


Sound Source Interaural Time Difference Auditory Perception Interaural Level Difference Complex Sound 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



Work on this chapter was supported by a grant from the Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR).


  1. Boring, E. G. (1942). Sensation and perception in the history of experimental psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  2. Bregman, A. S. (1990). Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sound. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Cherry, C. (1953). Some experiments on the recognition of speech with one and with two ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25, 975–981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dolan, T. R., & Yost, W. A. (1985). Basic research in hearing., Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 78(2, Supplement), 295–388.Google Scholar
  5. Durlach, N. I. (1972). Binaural signal detection: Equalization and cancellation theory. In J. V. Tobias (Ed.), Foundations of modern auditory theory, Vol. II. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  6. Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1973). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Krieger.Google Scholar
  7. Helmholtz, Hermann von (1885). On the sensations of tone as a physiological basis for the theory of music, 2nd English edition, translated by Alexander J. Ellis. London: Longmans, Green, and Co.Google Scholar
  8. Litovsky, R., Colburn, S., Yost, W. A., & Guzman, S. (1999). The precedence effect. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 1633–1654.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Watson, C. S. (2005). Some comments on informational masking. Acustica, 91(3), 502–512.Google Scholar
  10. Yost, W. A., & Watson, C. S. (1987). Auditory processing of complex sounds. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  11. Yost, W. A., Fay, R. R., & Popper, A. N. (2007). Auditory perception of sound sources. New York: Springer Science+Business Media.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Speech and Hearing ScienceArizona State UniversityTempeUSA

Personalised recommendations