Abstract
Trainees must have excellent clinical reasoning skills to practice medicine safely and effectively. Even when a trainee has an impressive knowledge base, he or she can have difficulty applying that knowledge to patient problems. In this chapter, the authors discuss how the cognitive processes involved in decision-making apply in medicine. They propose a framework for how educators can teach and model decision-making to medical trainees based on the literature and their extensive experience with novice clinicians. They propose that learners should manifest progress of clinical reasoning in four ways: (1) an improved ability to develop and share a concise verbal or written problem representation; (2) an increasing and consistent use of semantic qualifiers; (3) the ability to state, seek, identify, and recall the defining and discriminating features of a patient’s history and physical exam and link this to their knowledge base of “illness scripts” and (4) demonstrate an increasing metacognitive awareness which reduces cognitive biases in patient evaluations. They provide detailed descriptions of an array of strategies to address immature clinical reasoning.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000.
Newman-Toker DE, Pronovost PJ. Diagnostic errors—the next frontier for patient safety. JAMA. 2009;301(10):1060–2.
Kahnemann D. Thinking fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux; 2011.
Frederick S. Cognitive reflection and decision making. J Econ Perspect. 2005;19(4):25–42.
Ark T, Brooks LR, Eva KW. Giving learners the best of both worlds: do clinical teachers need to guard against teaching pattern recognition to novices? Acad Med. 2006;81:405–9.
Groopman J. How doctors think. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 2007.
Elstein A. Thinking about diagnostic thinking: a 30-year perspective. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2009;14:7–18.
Bowen JL. Educational strategies to promote clinical diagnostic reasoning. N Engl J Med. 2006;335(21):2217–25.
Charlin B, Boshuizen H, Custers EJ, Feltovich P. Scripts and clinical reasoning. Med Educ. 2007;41:1178–84.
Charlin B, Tardif J, Boshuizen H. Scripts and medical diagnostic knowledge: theory and applications for clinical reasoning instruction and research. Acad Med. 2000;75:182–90.
Eva K. What every teacher needs to know about clinical reasoning. Med Educ. 2004;39:98–106.
Bordage G. Elaborated knowledge: a key to successful diagnostic thinking. Acad Med. 1994;69(11):883–5.
Redelmeier DA, et al. Problems for clinical judgment: introducing cognitive psychology as one more basic science. CMAJ. 2001;164:358–60.
Elder L, Paul R. Critical thinking development: a stage theory. http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/critical-thinking-development-a-stage-theory/483. Accessed 12 Nov 2012.
Croskerry P. A universal model of diagnostic reasoning. Acad Med. 2009;84(8):1022–8.
Quirk M. Intuition and metacognition in medical education: keys to developing expertise. New York, NY: Springer; 2006.
Croskerry P. The importance of cognitive errors in diagnosis and strategies to minimize them. Acad Med. 2003;78(8):775–80.
Fonteyn ME, Kuipers B, Grobe SJ. A description of think aloud method and protocol analysis. Qual Health Res. 1993;3(4):430–41.
Lane JL, Gottlieb RP. Structured clinical observations: a method to teach clinical skills with limited time and financial resources. Pediatrics. 2000;105(4 Pt II):973–7.
Hamburger EK, Cuzzi S, Coddington DA, Allevi AM, Lopreiato J, Moon R, Yu C, Lane JL. Observation of resident clinical skills: outcomes of a program of direct observation in the continuity clinic setting. Acad Pediatr. 2011;11(5):394–402.
Zimmer KP, Solomon BS, Siberry GK, Serwint JR. Continuity-structured clinical observations: assessing the multiple-observer evaluation in a pediatric resident continuity clinic. Pediatrics. 2008;121(6):e1633–45.
Norcini JJ, Blank LL, Arnold GK, Kimball HR. The mini-CEX (clinical evaluation exercise): a preliminary investigation. Ann Intern Med. 1995;123(10):795–9.
Norcini JJ, Blank LL, Duffy FD, Fortna GS. The mini-CEX: a method for assessing clinical skills. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138(6):476–81.
Durning SJ, Cation LJ, Markert RJ, Pangaro LN. Assessing the reliability and validity of the mini-clinical evaluation exercise for internal medicine residency training. Acad Med. 2002;77(9):900–4.
Kogan JR, Bellini LM, Shea JA. Implementation of the mini-CEX to evaluate medical students’ clinical skills. Acad Med. 2002;77(11):1156–7.
Kogan JR, Holmboe ES, Hauer KE. Tools for direct observation and assessment of clinical skills of medical trainees: a systematic review. JAMA. 2009;302(12):1316–26.
Pituch K, Harris M, Bogdewic S. The brief structured observation—a tool for focused feedback. Acad Med. 1999;74(5):599.
Neher JO, Gordon KC, Meyer B, Stevens N. A five-step “microskills” model of clinical teaching. J Am Board Fam Pract. 1992;5(4):419–24.
Schenarts PJ, Schenarts KD. Educational impact of the electronic medical record. J Surg Educ. 2012;69(1):105–12.
Wolpaw TM, Wolpaw DR, Papp KK. SNAPPS: a learner-centered model for outpatient education. Acad Med. 2003;78(9):893–8.
Stuart E, Slavin S, Blankenburg R, Butani L, Konopasek L. Clinical reasoning. In: Morgenstern B, editor. Guidebook for clerkship directors. 4th ed. Syracuse, NY: Gegensatz Press; 2012.
Baker E, Ledford C, Liston B. Teaching, evaluating, and remediating clinical reasoning. Acad Intern Med Insight. 2010;8(1):12–3, 17.
Wolpaw T, Papp KK, Bordage G. Using SNAPPS to facilitate the expression of clinical reasoning and uncertainties: a randomized comparison group trial. Acad Med. 2009;84(4):517–24.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mutnick, A., Barone, M. (2014). Assessing and Remediating Clinical Reasoning. In: Kalet, A., Chou, C. (eds) Remediation in Medical Education. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9025-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9025-8_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-9024-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-9025-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)