Skip to main content

The View from the Dean’s Office

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

It is the role of a medical school student affairs dean to balance the responsibilities of advocating for students with upholding the integrity of the curricular program. This work is especially challenging when dealing with students who are struggling and require remediation. Given her diverse portfolio of responsibilities as dean for student affairs, which includes overseeing the academic progress of students, disciplinary process, mentoring and advising, student health and wellness programs, international health program, student life, and chairing of an executive committee for admissions, she is often the first one to identify and intervene with a struggling student. In addition to working with students and faculty to identify the underlying causes of a student’s problem, the dean’s office needs to be concerned about resource availability for and cost of remediation, legal and privacy issues, the implications of labeling students, the definition of the official written record, and final competency decisions. In this chapter, the author discusses the resources needed for remediation, their costs, and resources currently not available. This experienced student affairs dean shares her experience reviewing admission information, discusses preadmission factors that may portend the need for remedial assistance once in medical school, and offers NYU School of Medicine technical standards as an example. She discusses her approach to counseling students regarding how to communicate their remediation history to future training directors and employers. She thereby demonstrates how it is possible to balance the school’s interests with obligations to students, faculty, and society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Julian ER. Validity of the Medical College Admission Test for predicting medical school performance. Acad Med. 2005;80(10):910–7. PubMed PMID: 16186610.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Papadakis MA, Teherani A, Banach MA, Knettler TR, Rattner SL, Stern DT, Veloski JJ, Hodgson CS. Disciplinary action by medical boards and prior behavior in medical school. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(25):2673–82. PubMed PMID: 16371633.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Eva KW, Reiter HI, Rosenfeld J, Trinh K, Wood TJ, Norman GR. Association between a medical school admission process using the multiple mini-interview and national licensing examination scores. JAMA. 2012;308(21):2233–40. doi:10.1001/jama.2012.36914.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Law School Admissions Council. Law school admissions council volume summary. LSAC data; 2013. http://www.lsac.org/lsacresources/data/lsac-volume-summary.asp. Accessed 17 July 2013.

  5. Garrison G, Mikesell C, Matthew D. Medical school graduation and attrition rates. Anal Brief. 2007;7(2):1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  6. American Association of Medical Colleges (AAMC). Executive summary: medical students with disabilities—Group on Student Affairs (GSA)—member center [Internet]. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges; 1995–2013. Available from https://www.aamc.org/members/gsa/64660/gsa_ada.html

  7. NYU School of Medicine. NYU School of Medicine Technical Standards [Internet]. New York: NYU Langone Medical Center; n.d. Available from http://school.med.nyu.edu/nyusom-technical-standards

  8. Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), 20 U.S.C. § 1232g; 34 CFR Part 9 [Internet]. Available from http://www.ed.gov/policy/gen/guid/fpco/ferpa/index.html

  9. Cleary L. “Forward feeding” about students’ progress: the case for longitudinal, progressive, and shared assessment of medical students. Acad Med. 2008;83(9):800. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e318181cfbc.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cox SM. “Forward feeding” about students’ progress: information on struggling medical students should not be shared among clerkship directors or with students’ current teachers. Acad Med. 2008;83(9):801. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e318181cfe6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Medical Society of the State of New York. MSSNY-CPH Mission [Internet]. New York: Medical Society of the State of New York; 2011. Available from http://www.mssny.org/mssnyip.cfm?c=i&nm=Mission_Statement

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lynn Buckvar-Keltz M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Buckvar-Keltz, L. (2014). The View from the Dean’s Office. In: Kalet, A., Chou, C. (eds) Remediation in Medical Education. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9025-8_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9025-8_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-9024-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-9025-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics