Skip to main content

Enteroatmospheric Fistula

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Complexities in Colorectal Surgery

Abstract

Patient morbidity can result from technical errors, or it can simply be an unavoidable outcome related to a disease process and its surgical management. Some postoperative complications “come with the territory”—such as a possible wound infection or anastomotic leak in the setting of colectomy. On the other hand, enteroatmospheric fistula (EAF) is a complex and highly morbid complication, and one that is extremely painful and difficult for the patient, surgeon, nurse, and family alike. Occurrence of an EAF was a rare event as recently as 30 years ago and was often followed quickly by mortality due to sepsis, electrolyte imbalance, and malnutrition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Duff JH, Moffat J. Abdominal sepsis managed by leaving abdomen open. Surgery. 1981;90(4):774–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Maetani S, Tobe T. Open peritoneal drainage as effective treatment of advanced peritonitis. Surgery. 1981;90(5):804–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mughal MM, Bancewicz J, Irving MH. ‘Laparostomy’: a technique for management of intractable intra-abdominal sepsis. Br J Surg. 1986;73(4):253–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hedderich GS, Wexler MJ, McLean AP, Meakins JL. The septic abdomen: open management with Marlex mesh with a zipper. Surgery. 1986;99(4):399–408.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ivatury RR, Nallathambi M, Rohman M, Stahl WM. Open management of the posttraumatic septic abdomen. Am Surg. 1990;56(9):548–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Stone HH, Strom PR, Mullins RJ. Management of the major coagulopathy with onset during laparotomy. Ann Surg. 1983;197(5):532–5.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Burch JM, Ortiz VB, Richardson RJ, Martin RR, Mattox KL, Jordan GL. Abbreviated laparotomy and planned reoperation for critically injured patients. Ann Surg. 1992;215(5):476–84.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Barnes GE, Laine GA, Giam PY, Smith EE, Granger HJ. Cardiovascular responses to elevation of intra-abdominal hydrostatic pressure. Am J Physiol. 1985;248(2):R208–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tremblay LN, Feliciano DV, Schmidt J, et al. Skin only or silo closure in the critically ill patient with an open abdomen. Am J Surg. 2001;182(6):670–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. D’Hont M, Devriendt D, Van Rooy F, et al. Treatment of small-bowel fistulae in the open abdomen with topical negative-pressure therapy. Am J Surg. 2011;202(2):e20–4.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pelz JOW, Doerfer J, Decker M, Dimmler A, Hohenberger W, Meyer T. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion (HIPEC) decrease wound strength of colonic anastomosis in a rat model. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007;22(8):941–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Boutros C, Somasundar P, Espat NJ. Early results on the use of biomaterials as adjuvant to abdominal wall closure following cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. World J Surg Oncol. 2010;72(8):1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Polk TM, Schwab CW. Metabolic and nutritional support of the enterocutaneous fistula patient: a three-phase approach. World J Surg. 2012;36(3):524–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schecter WP. Management of enterocutaneous fistulas. Surg Clin North Am. 2011;91(3):481–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kritayakirana K, Maggio PM, Brundage S, Purtill MA, Staudenmayer K, Spain DA. Outcomes and complications of open abdomen technique for managing non-trauma patients. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2010;3(2):118–22.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bjorck M, D’Amours SK, Hamilton AE. Closure of the open abdomen. Am Surg. 2011;77 suppl 1:S58–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fabian TC. Damage control in trauma: laparotomy wound management acute to chronic. Surg Clin North Am. 2007;87(1):73–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Miller RS, Morris Jr JA, Diaz Jr JJ, Herring MB, May AK. Complications after 344 damage-control open celiotomies. J Trauma. 2005;59(6):1365–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schecter WP, Ivatury RR, Rotondo MF, Hirshberg A. Open abdomen after trauma and abdominal sepsis: a strategy for management. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;203(3):390–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Prichayudh S, Sriussadaporn S, Samorn P, et al. Management of open abdomen with an absorbable mesh closure. Surg Today. 2011;41(1):72–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Stevens P. Vacuum-assisted closure of laparostomy wounds: a critical review of the literature. Int Wound J. 2009;6(4):259–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Shaikh IA, Ballard-Wilson A, Yalamarthi S, Amin AI. Use of topical negative pressure in assisted abdominal closure does not lead to high incidence of enteric fistulae. Colorectal Dis. 2010;12(9):931–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bee TK, Croce MA, Maginotti LJ, et al. Temporary abdominal closure techniques: a prospective randomized trial comparing polyglactin 910 mesh and vacuum-assisted closure. J Trauma. 2008;65:337–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Miller PR, Thompson JT, Faler BJ, Meredith JW, Chang MC. Late fascial closure in lieu of ventral hernia: the next step in open abdomen management. J Trauma. 2002;53(5):843–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Acosta S, Bjarnason T, Petersson U, et al. Multicentre prospective study of fascial closure rate after open abdomen with vacuum and mesh-mediated fascial traction. Br J Surg. 2011;98(5):735–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Koss W, Ho HC, Yu M, et al. Preventing loss of domain: a management strategy for closure of the “open abdomen” during the initial hospitalization. J Surg Educ. 2009;66(2):89–95.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Vertrees A, Greer L, Pickett C, et al. Modern management of complex open abdominal wounds of war: a 5-year experience. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207(6):801–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kafie FE, Tessier DJ, Williams RA, et al. Serial abdominal closure technique (the “SAC” procedure): a novel method for delayed closure of the abdominal wall. Am Surg. 2003;69(2):102–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Blatnik J, Jin J, Rosen M. Abdominal hernia repair with bridging acellular dermal matrix- an expensive hernia sac. Am J Surg. 2008;196:47–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. De Moya M, Dunham M, Inaba K, et al. Long-term outcome of acellular dermal matrix when used for large traumatic open abdomen. J Trauma. 2008;65:349–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Scott BG, Welsh FJ, Pham HQ, et al. Early aggressive closure of the open abdomen. J Trauma. 2006;60(1):17–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Schuster R, Singh J, Safadi BY, Wren SM. The use of acellular dermal matrix for contaminated abdominal wall defects: wound status predicts success. Am J Surg. 2006;192(5):594–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kushimoto S, Yamamoto Y, Aiboshi J, et al. Usefulness of the bilateral anterior rectus abdominis sheath turnover flap method for early fascial closure in patients requiring open abdominal management. World J Surg. 2007;31(1):2–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Girard S, Sideman M, Spain DA. A novel approach to the problem of intestinal fistulization arising in patients managed with open peritoneal cavities. Am J Surg. 2002;184(2):166–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Becker HP, Willms A, Schwab R. Small bowel fistulas and the open abdomen. Scand J Surg. 2007;96(4):263–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Jamshidi R, Schecter WP. Biological dressings for the management of enteric fistulas in the open abdomen: a preliminary report. Arch Surg. 2007;142(8):793–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Collier B, Guillamondegui O, Cotton B, et al. Feeding the open abdomen. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2007;31(5):410–5.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Evenson AR, Fischer JE. Current management of enterocutaneous fistula. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10(3):455–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Harris C, Shannon R. An innovative enterostomal therapy nurse model of community wound care delivery: a retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2008;35(2):169–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Martinez JL, Luque-de-Leon E, Mier J, Blanco-Benevides R, Robledo F. Systematic management of postoperative enterocutaneous fistulas: factors related to outcomes. World J Surg. 2008;32(3):436–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Fischer PE, Fabian TC, Magnotti LJ, et al. A ten-year review of enterocutaneous fistulas after laparotomy for trauma. J Trauma. 2009;67(5):924–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Wright A, Wright M. Bedside management of an abdominal wound containing an enteroatmospheric fistula: a case report. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2011;57(1):28–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Ramsay PT, Mejia VA. Management of enteroatmospheric fistulae in the open abdomen. Am Surg. 2010;76(6):637–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Layton B, Dubose J, Nichols S, Connaughton J, Jones T, Pratt J. Pacifying the open abdomen with concomitant intestinal fistula: a novel approach. Am J Surg. 2010;199(4):e48–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Al-Khoury G, Kaufman D, Hirshberg A. Improved control of exposed fistula in the open abdomen. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206(2):397–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Goverman J, Yelon JA, Platz JJ, Singson RC, Turcinovic M. The “Fistula-VAC”, a technique for management of enterocutaneous fistulae arising within the open abdomen: a report of 5 cases. J Trauma. 2006;60(2):428–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. O’Brien B, Landis-Erdman J, Erwin-Toth P. Nursing management of multiple enterocutaneous fistulae located in the center of a large open abdominal wound: a case study. Ostomy Wound Manage. 1998;44(1):20–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Geoghegan J, Robert K. The Convatec Wound Manager: a new stoma appliance. Br J Clin Prac. 1990;44(12):750–1.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Subramanian MJ, Liscum KR, Hirshberg A. The floating stoma: a new technique for controlling exposed fistulae in abdominal trauma. J Trauma. 2002;53:386–8.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Dorta G. Role of octreotide and somatostatin in the treatment of intestinal fistulae. Digestion. 1999;60 suppl(2):53–6.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Battershill PE, Clissold SP. Octreotide: a review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in conditions associated with excessive peptide secretion. Drugs. 1989;38(5):658–702.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Stevens P, Foulkes RE, Hartford-Benyon JS, Delicata RJ. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of somatostatin and its analogues in the treatment of enterocutaneous fistula. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;23(10):912–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Draus Jr JM, Huss SA, Harty NJ, Cheadle WG, Larson GM. Enterocutaneous fistula: are treatments improving? Surgery. 2006;140(4):570–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Leandros E, Antonakis PT, Albanopoulos K, Dervenis C, Konstadoulakis MM. Somatostatin versus octreotide in the treatment of patients with gastrointestinal and pancreatic fistulas. Can J Gastroenterol. 2004;18(5):303–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Alivizatos V, Felekis D, Zorbalas A. Evaluation of the effectiveness of octreotide in the conservative treatment of postoperative enterocutaneous fistulas. Hepatogastroenterology. 2002;49(46):1010–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Hesse U, Ysebaert D, de Hemptinne B. Role of somatostatin-14 and its analogues in the management of gastrointestinal fistulae: clinical data. Gut. 2001;49 suppl 4:iv11–21.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Makhdoom ZA, Komar MJ, Still CD. Nutrition and enterocutaneous fistulas. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2000;31(3):195–204.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Alvarez C, McFadden DW, Reber HA. Complicated enterocutaneous fistulas: failure of octreotide to improve healing. World J Surg. 2000;24(5):533–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Paran H, Neufeld D, Kaplan O, Klausner J, Freund U. Octreotide for treatment of postoperative alimentary tract fistulas. World J Surg. 1995;19(3):430–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Sancho JJ, di Costanzo J, Nubiola P, et al. Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of early octreotide in patients with postoperative enterocutaneous fistula. Br J Surg. 1995;82(5):638–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Kocak S, Bumin C, Karayalcin K, Alacayir I, Aribal D. Treatment of external biliary, pancreatic, and intestinal fistulas with a somatostatin analogue. Dig Dis. 1994;12(1):62–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Tang SJ, Nieto JM, Jensen DM, Ohning GV, Pisegna JR. The novel use of an intravenous proton pump inhibitor in a patient with short bowel syndrome. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2002;34(1):62–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Hickman Jr RL, Douglas SL. Impact of chronic critical illness on the psychological outcomes of family members. AACN Adv Crit Care. 2010;21(1):80–91.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Jernigan TW, Fabian TC, Croce MA, et al. Staged management of giant abdominal wall defects. Ann Surg. 2003;238:349–57.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Joels CS, Vanderveer AS, Newcomb WL, et al. Abdominal wall reconstruction after temporary abdominal closure: a ten-year review. Surg Innov. 2006;13:223–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Dionigi G, Dionigi R, Rovera F, et al. Treatment of high output entero-cutaneous fistulae associated with large abdominal wall defects: single center experience. Int J Surg. 2008;6:51–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Rodriguez ED, Bluebond-Langner R, Silverman RP, et al. Abdominal wall reconstruction following severe loss of domain: The R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center algorithm. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120:669–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Ramirez OM, Ruas E, Dellon L. “Components separation” method for closure of abdominal-wall defects: an anatomic and clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;86:519–26.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Wind J, van Koperen PJ, Slors FM, Bemelman WA. Single-stage closure of enterocutaneous fistula and stomas in the presence of large abdominal wall defects using the components separation technique. Am J Surg. 2009;197:24–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Connolly PT, Teubner A, Lees NP, Anderson ID, Scott NA, Carlson GL. Outcome of reconstructive surgery for intestinal fistula in the open abdomen. Ann Surg. 2008;247:440–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. De Vries Reilingh TS, van Goor H, Charbon JA, et al. Repair of giant midline abdominal wall hernias: “components separation technique” versus prosthetic repair. World J Surg. 2007;31:756–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Dragu A, Klein P, Unglaub F, et al. Tensiometry as a decision tool for abdominal wall reconstruction with component separation. World J Surg. 2009;33:1174–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Vargo D. Component separation in the management of the difficult abdominal wall. Am J Surg. 2004;188:633–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Shabatian H, Lee D, Abbas MA. Components separation: a solution to complex abdominal wall defects. Am Surg. 2008;74:912–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. De Vries Reilingh TS, van Goor H, Rosman C, et al. “Components separation technique” for the repair of large abdominal wall hernias. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;196:32–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Howdieshell TR, Proctor CD, Sternberg E, Cué JI, Mondy JS, Hawkins ML. Temporary abdominal closure followed by definitive abdominal wall reconstruction of the open abdomen. Am J Surg. 2004;188:301–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Lowe JB, Lowe JB, Baty JD, Garza JR. Risks associated with “components separation” for closure of complex abdominal wall defects. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111:1276–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Ewart CJ, Lankford AB, Gamboa MG. Successful closure of abdominal wall hernias using components separation technique. Ann Plast Surg. 2003;50:269–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Carbonell AM, Cobb WS, Chen SM. Posterior components separation during retromuscular hernia repair. Hernia. 2008;12:359–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Ennis LS, Young JS, Gampper TJ, Drake DB. The “open-book” variation of component separation for repair of massive midline abdominal wall hernia. Am Surg. 2003;69:733–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Tobias AM, Low DW. The use of subfascial vicryl mesh buttress to aid in the closure of massive ventral hernias following damage-control laparotomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112:766–76.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Kingsnorth AN, Shahid MK, Valliattu AJ, Hadden RA, Porter CS. Open onlay mesh repair for major abdominal wall hernias with selective use of components separation and fibrin sealant. World J Surg. 2008;32:26–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Rosen MJ, Jin J, McGee MF, Williams C, Marks J, Ponsky JL. Laparoscopic component separation in the single-stage treatment of infected abdominal wall prosthetic removal. Hernia. 2007;11:435–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Stark B, Strigård K. Definitive reconstruction of full-thickness abdominal wall defects initially treated with skin grafting of exposed intestines. Hernia. 2007;11:533–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Hadad I, Small W, Dumanian GA. Repair of massive ventral hernias with the separation of parts technique: reversal of the ‘lost domain’. Am Surg. 2009;75:301–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Rosen MJ, Williams C, Jin J, et al. Laparoscopic versus open-component separation: a comparative analysis in a porcine model. Am J Surg. 2007;194:385–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Milburn ML, Shah PK, Friedman EB, et al. Laparoscopically assisted components separation technique for ventral incisional hernia repair. Hernia. 2007;11:157–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Maas SM, van Engeland M, Leeksma NG, Bleichrodt RP. A modification of the “components separation” technique for closure of abdominal wall defects in the presence of an enterostomy. J Am Coll Surg. 1999;189:138–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Liyanage SH, Purohit GS, Frye JNR, Giordano P. Anterior abdominal wall reconstruction with a Permacol implant. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;59:553–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Parker DM, Armstrong PJ, Frizzi JD, North JH. Porcine dermal collagen (Permacol) for abdominal wall reconstruction. Curr Surg. 2006;63:255–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Shaikh FM, Giri SK, Durrani S, Waldron D, Grace PA. Experience with porcine acellular dermal collagen implant in one-stage tension-free reconstruction of acute and chronic abdominal wall defects. World J Surg. 2007;31:1966–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Hsu PW, Salgado CJ, Kent K, et al. Evaluation of porcine dermal collagen (Permacol) used in abdominal wall reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009;62(11):1484–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Franklin ME, Gonzalez JJ, Glass JL. Use of porcine small intestinal submucosa as a prosthetic device for laparoscopic repair of hernias in contaminated fields: 2-year follow-up. Hernia. 2004;8:186–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Ueno T, Pickett LC, de la Fuente S, Lawson DC, Pappas TN. Clinical application of porcine small intestinal submucosa in the management of infected or potentially contaminated abdominal defects. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004;8:109–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Helton WS, Fisichella PM, Berger R, Horgan S, Espat NJ, Abcarian H. Short-term outcomes with small intestinal submucosa for ventral abdominal hernia. Arch Surg. 2005;140:549–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Jin H, Rosen MJ, Blatnik J, et al. Use of acellular dermal matrix for complicated ventral hernia repair: does technique affect outcomes? J Am Coll Surg. 2007;205:654–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Espinosa-de-los-Monteros A, de la Torre JI, Marrero I, Andrades P, Davis MR, Vasconez LO. Utilization of human cadaveric acellular dermis for abdominal hernia reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2007;58:264–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Patton JH, Berry S, Kralovich KA. Use of human acellular dermal matrix in complex and contaminated abdominal wall reconstructions. Am J Surg. 2007;193:360–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Bellows CF, Albo D, Berger DH, Awad SS. Abdominal wall repair using human acellular dermis. Am J Surg. 2007;194:192–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Misra S, Raj PK, Tarr SM, Treat RC. Results of AlloDerm use in abdominal hernia repair. Hernia. 2008;12:247–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Bluebond-Langner R, Keifa ES, Mithani S, Bochicchio GV, Scalea T, Rodriguez ED. Recurrent abdominal laxity following interpositional human acellular dermal matrix. Ann Plast Surg. 2008;60:76–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Taner T, Cima RR, Larson WV, Dozios EJ, Pemberton JH, Wolff BG. Surgical treatment of complex enterocutaneous fistulas in IBD patients using human acellular dermal matrix. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2009;15:1208–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Maurice SM, Skeete DA. Use of human acellular dermal matrix for abdominal wall reconstructions. Am J Surg. 2009;197:35–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Lin JH, Spoerke N, Deveney C, Martindale R. Reconstruction of complex abdominal wall hernias using acellular human dermal matrix: a single institution experience. Am J Surg. 2008;197:599–603.

    Google Scholar 

  105. Pomahac B, Aflaki P. Use of a non-cross linked porcine dermal scaffold in abdominal wall reconstruction. Am J Surg. 2010;199(1):22–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Espinosa-de-los-Monteros A, de la Torre JI, Ahumada LA, Person DW, Rosenberg LZ, Vasconez LO. Reconstruction of the abdominal wall for incisional hernia repair. Am J Surg. 2006;191:173–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric Keith Johnson MD, FACS, FASCRS .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Johnson, E.K. (2014). Enteroatmospheric Fistula. In: Steele, S.R., Maykel, J.A., Champagne, B.J., Orangio, G.R. (eds) Complexities in Colorectal Surgery. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9022-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9022-7_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-9021-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-9022-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics