Skip to main content

Medicolegal and Ethical Dilemmas

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Complexities in Colorectal Surgery

Abstract

The ethical and legal challenges that face colorectal surgeons are the same challenges that have faced all physicians throughout history. The contemporary legal environment presents special challenges to the practicing physician. In this chapter, we consider those medicolegal and ethical challenges that colorectal surgeons in practice are most likely to face.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wah RM. Letter. “From the AMA: medical malpractice reform.” The New York Times. 15 Oct 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Medical liability reform – demonstration grants. American College of Physicians. 2011. Accessed online on 16 Aug 2012 at: http://www.acponline.org/advocacy/where_we_stand/access/internists_guide/iii12-medical-liability-reform-demo.pdf.

  3. Carroll AE, Parikh PD, Buddenbaum JL. The impact of defense expenses in medical malpractice claims. J Law Med Ethics. 2012;40(1):135–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. The American College of Surgeons. Statement on the physician acting as an expert witness. Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons, 4th edn, Vol. 96, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kern KA. Medical malpractice involving colon and rectal disease: a 20-year review of United States civil court litigation. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36(6):531–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rex DK, Bond JH, Feld AD. Medical-legal risks of incident cancers after clearing colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96(4):952–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Barloon TJ, Shumway J. Medical malpractice involving radiologic colon examinations: a review of 38 recent cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;165(2):343–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gerstenberger PD, Plumeri PA. Malpractice claims in gastrointestinal endoscopy: analysis of an insurance industry data base. Gastrointest Endosc. 1993;39(2):132–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Beck DE. Chapter 14. Medicolegal aspects of coloprotologic practice. In: Wexner SD, Zbar AP, Pescatori M, editors. Complex anorectal disorders. London: Springer; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gay Jr CF. Medicolegal issues. In: Hicks TC, Beck DE, Opelka FG, Timmcke AE, editors. Complications of colorectal surgery. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1996. p. 468–77.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 6th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008. p. 120–1.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Culver CM, Gert B. Philosophy in medicine. New York: Oxford University Press; 1982. p. 123–6.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 6th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2009. p. 121.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kerrigan J, Rovelstad S, Kodner IJ, La Puma J, Keune JD. All in the family: how close is too close? The ethics of treating loved ones. Surgery. 2011;149(3):433–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. La Puma J, Priest ER. Is there a doctor in the house? An analysis of the practice of physicians’ treating their own families. JAMA. 1992;267(13):1810–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. American Medical Association. Of the duties of physicians to each other, and to the profession at large: of the duties of physicians in reward to professional services to each other. In: Code of medical ethics. Chicago: American Medical Association; 1847, chap 2, article II.

    Google Scholar 

  17. AMA Code of Ethics. Opinion 8.19-Self-treatment or treatment of immediate family members. Accessed online on 2 Sept 2012 at: http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/physician-resources/medical-ethics/code-medical-ethics/opinion819.page?.

  18. Baren JM. Ethical dilemmas in the care of minors in the emergency department. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2006;24(3):619–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jaworska A. Advance directives and substitute decision-making. In: Zalta EN, editor. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2009 ed.). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2009/entries/advance-directives/.

  20. History of the POLST paradigm initiative. Center for Ethics in Health Care. Oregon Health and Science University. 2008. Accessed online on 13 Sept 2012 at: http://www.ohsu.edu/polst/developing/history.htm.

  21. Perkins HS. Controlling death: the false promise of advance directives. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:51–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. POLST Paradigm Forms. Physician orders for life sustaining treatment website. Accessed online at: http://www.ohsu.edu/polst/programs/sample-forms.htm. on 19 Sept 2012.

  23. State Contact List. Physician orders for life sustaining treatment website. Accessed online at: http://www.ohsu.edu/polst/programs/state+programs.htm. on 19 Sept 2012.

  24. Hickman SE, Nelson CA, Perrin NA, Moss AH, Hammes BJ, Tolle SW. A comparison of methods to communicate treatment preferences in nursing facilities: traditional practices versus the physician orders for life-sustaining treatment program. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010;58(7):1241–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. American Medical Association. Conflict of interest policy and statement on disclosure of affiliations. 1999. Accessed online on 21 Dec 2009 at: www.ama-assn.org/ama1/pub/upload/mm/37/coi-policy.doc.

  26. The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA). Code on interactions with healthcare professionals. 2009. Accessed online on 21 Dec 2009 at: http://www.phrma.org/files/attachments/PhRMA%20Marketing%20Code%202008.pdf.

  27. The National Institutes of Health Ethics Program. Conflict of interest. 2008. Accessed online on 21 Dec 2009 at: http://ethics.od.nih.gov/topics/coi.htm.

  28. Institute of Medicine. Conflict of interest in medical research, education, and practice. Washington: National Academies Press; 2009. Accessed online on 30 Oct 2009 at: http://www.iom.edu/en/Reports/2009/Conflict-of-Interest-in-Medical-Research-Education-and-Practice.aspx.

  29. The AAMC Task Force on Industry Funding of Medical Education. Industry funding of medical education report of an AAMC task force. Accessed online on 30 Oct 2009 at: http://services.aamc.org/publications/showfile.cfm?file=version114.pdf&prd_id=232.

  30. Keune JD, Vig S, Hall BL, Matthews BD, Klingensmith ME. Taking disclosure seriously: disclosing financial conflicts of interest at the American College of Surgeons. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;212(2):215–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Okike K, Kocher MS, Wei EX, Mehlman CT, Bhandari M. Accuracy of conflict-of-interest disclosures reported by physicians. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(15):1466–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Emanuel EJ. Medical ethics in the era of managed care: the need for institutional structures instead of principles for individual cases. J Clin Ethics. 1995;6(4):335–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Campbell EG, Gruen RL, Mountford J, Miller LG, Cleary PD, Blumenthal D. A national survey of physician-industry relationships. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(17):1742–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Campbell EG, Weissman JS, Ehringhaus S, Rao SR, Moy B, Feibelmann S, Goold SD. Institutional academic industry relationships. JAMA. 2007;298(15):1779–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Harris G. Top psychiatrist didn’t report drug maker’s pay, files show. The New York Times. 4 Oct 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Meier B, Duff W. Medical school says former army surgeon hid ties to Medtronic. The New York Times. 14 July 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Giles J. Exposing the links between doctors and Big Pharma. New Scientist. Feb 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Martinez B. Spitzer charges Glaxo concealed Paxil data. The Wall Street Journal. 3 June 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Brandeis L. What publicity can do. Harper’s Weekly. 20 Dec 1913.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Woodward C. New US law applies ‘sunshine’ to physician payments and gifts from drug, device industries. CMAJ. 2010;182(10):E467–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA). Public Law 111–148. 23 Mar 2010.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ira J. Kodner MD, FACS .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Keune, J.D., Kodner, I.J. (2014). Medicolegal and Ethical Dilemmas. In: Steele, S.R., Maykel, J.A., Champagne, B.J., Orangio, G.R. (eds) Complexities in Colorectal Surgery. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9022-7_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9022-7_39

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-9021-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-9022-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics