Skip to main content

Chemical and Isotopic Studies of Ancient Metals

  • Chapter
Archaeometallurgy in Global Perspective

Abstract

Chemical treatment of metal artifacts to determine their composition was one of the first applications of science to archaeology. In this chapter, various chemical and isotopic analytical techniques are described as they relate to the study of ancient metals. In addition, the problems and pitfalls of such analyses, especially as they relate to attempts to assign “provenance” to ancient artifacts, are discussed. In general, the chemical and isotopic analysis of metal artifacts as well as metallurgical artifacts (e.g., crucibles and slags) is essential for reconstructing the ancient technological process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It is important to note whether results are expressed in atomic or weight %. Atomic % denotes the percentage of the total number of atoms in a sample that are of a particular element. Weight % denotes what percentage of the mass of the sample each element contributes. If an archaeometallurgy paper does not explicitly state which system has been used, with caution, it can be assumed the results are in weight %.

  2. 2.

    Bear in mind that, with at least 93 naturally occurring elements in the Periodic Table, no analysis containing fewer elements can truly claim to be ‘fully quantitative’!

Bibliography

  • Bray, P. (2009). Exploring the social basis of technology: Reanalysing regional archaeometric studies of the first copper and tin-bronze use in Great Britain and Ireland. Unpublished D.Phil. Thesis, University of Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, P., & Pollard, A. M. (2012). A new interpretative approach to the chemistry of copper-alloy objects: source, recycling and technology. Antiquity 86, 853–867.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brothwell, D. R., & Pollard, A. M. (Eds.). (2001). Handbook of Archaeological Sciences. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junghans, S., Sangmeister, E., & Schröder, M. (1960). Metallanalysen kuperzeitlicher und fühbronzezeitlicher Bodenfunde aus Europa. Studien zu den Anfängen der Metallurgie 1. Berlin: Gebr. Mann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junghans, S., Sangmeister, E., & Schröder, M. (1968). Kupfer und Bronze in der frühen Metallzeit Europas. Studien zu den Anfängen der Metallurgie 2 Berlin: Gebr. Mann

    Google Scholar 

  • Pernicka, E. (1998). Whither metal analysis in archaeology? In C. Mordant, M. Peront, & V. Rychner (Eds.), L’Atelier du Bronzier en Europe du xxe au viiie siècle avant notre ère; vol 1: 259–267. Paris: Edition du CTHS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, A. M., & Heron, C. (2008). Archaeological Chemistry. Cambridge, Royal Society of Chemistry (2nd revised ed).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, A. M., Thomas, R. G., Ware, D. P., & Williams, P. A. (1991). Experimental smelting of secondary copper minerals: implications for Early Bronze Age metallurgy in Britain. In E. Pernicka, & G.A. Wagner (Eds.) Archaeometry ’90:127–136. Basel: Birkhauser Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, M., Batt, C., Stern, B., & Young, S. M. M. (2007). Analytical Chemistry in Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rehren, Th., & Pernicka, E. (2008). Coins, artefacts and isotopes – archaeometallurgy and archaeometry. Archaeometry, 50(2), 232–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohl, B., & Needham, S. (1998). The Circulation of Metal in the British Bronze Age: the Application of Lead Isotope Analysis. Occasional Paper 102, British Museum, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowlands, M. J. (1971). The archaeological interpretation of prehistoric metalworking. World Archaeology, 3, 210–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shortland, A. J., Freestone, I. C., & Rehren, Th. (Eds.). (2009). From Mine to Microscope – Advances in the Study of Ancient Technology. Oxford, Oxbow Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tylecote, R. F. (1976). A History of Metallurgy. Metals Society, London (2nd ed., Institute of Materials, London, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tylecote, R. F. (1987). The Early History of Metallurgy in Europe. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, S. M. M., Pollard, A. M., Budd, P. D., & Ixer, R. A. (Eds.). (1999). Metals in Antiquity. BAR International Series 792. Oxford: Archaeopress.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Mark Pollard .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pollard, A., Bray, P. (2014). Chemical and Isotopic Studies of Ancient Metals. In: Roberts, B., Thornton, C. (eds) Archaeometallurgy in Global Perspective. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9017-3_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics