Advertisement

Assessing the Effects of Imprinting and Maternal Genotypes on Complex Genetic Traits

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Statistics book series (LNS, volume 215)

Abstract

A susceptibility variant may affect a trait not only through sequence variation, but also through parental origin, and even through combination with the maternal genotype. Although associations have been established for more than one thousand five hundred Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) and over two hundred diseases through genome-wide association studies, imprinting and maternal genotype effects (collectively referred to as parent-of-origin effects) have largely not been taken into account. The ignorance of parent-of-origin effects may have adversely contributed to “missing heritability”; thus, attempts have been made to incorporate these two epigenetic factors when assessing the effect of a genetic variant on a complex trait. In this review, we will discuss the difference between retrospective and prospective studies in genetic analysis and indicate how this difference may influence the choice of methods for assessing parent-of-origin effects on the risk of complex genetic traits. We will provide expositions on several specific study designs and their associated analysis methods, including the case-parent triad design and designs that include control samples, such as the case-parent triads/control-parent triads design. Most available methods are for retrospective studies, but a handful of methods applicable to extended pedigrees from prospective studies also exist. Although log-linear or logistic models are frequently used to factor in parent-of-origin effects, we review non-parametric approaches as well for detecting imprinting effects. We further discuss implications of various assumptions made in the modeling to avoid overparameterization. In summary, a model factoring in epigenetically modulated gene variant effects is expected to be of greater value in risk assessment and prediction if such epigenetic factors indeed play a role in the etiology of the disease.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation grant DMS-1208968. The author would like to thank Dr. Lynn Friedman for her valuable comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Ainsworth, H.F., Unwin, J., Jamison, D.L., Cordell, H.J.: Investigation of maternal effects, maternal-fetal interactions and parent-of-origin effects (imprinting), using mothers and their offspring. Genet. Epidemiol. 35, 19–45 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Becker, T., Baur, M.P., Knapp, M.: Detection of parent-of-origin effects in nuclear families using haplotype analysis. Hum. Hered. 62, 64–76 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boycott, K.M., Parboosingh, J.S., Chodirker, B.N., Lowry, R.B., McLeod, D.R., Morris, J., Greenberg, C.R., Chudley, A.E., Bernier, F.P., Midgley, J., Moller, L.B., Innes, A.M.: Clinical genetics and the Hutterite population: a review of Mendelian disorders. Am. J. Med. Genet. Part A 146A, 1088–1098 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Buyske, S.: Maternal genotype effects can alias case genotype effects in case-control studies. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 16, 784–785 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cassidy, S.B., Driscoll, D.J.: Prader-Willi syndrome. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 17, 3–13 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen, J., Zheng, H., Wilson, M.L.: Likelihood ratio tests for maternal and fetal genetic effects on obstetric complications. Genet. Epidemiol. 33, 526–538 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Childs, E.J., Palmer, C.G., Lange, K., Sinsheimer, J.S.: Modeling maternal-offspring gene-gene interactions: the extended-MFG test. Genet. Epidemiol. 34, 512–521 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cordell, H.J., Barratt, B.J., Clayton, D.G.: Case/pseudocontrol analysis in genetic association studies: a unified framework for detection of genotype and haplotype associations, gene-gene and gene-environment interactions, and parent-of-origin effects. Genet. Epidemiol. 26, 167–185 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Couzin, J.: Genetics: DNA test for breast cancer risk draws criticism. Science 322, 357 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Edwards, D.R.V., Gilbert, J.R., Jiang, L., Gallins, P.J., Caywood, L., Creason, M., Fuzzell, D., Knebusch, C., Jackson, C.E., Pericak-Vance, M.A., Haines, J.L., Scott, W.K.: Successful aging shows linkage to chromosomes 6, 7, and 14 in the Amish. Ann. Hum. Genet. 75, 516–528 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Epstein, M., Veal, C., Trembath, R., Barker, J., Li, C., Satten, G.: Genetic association analysis using data from triads and unrelated subjects. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 76, 592–608 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Falls, J.G., Pulford, D.J., Wylie, A.A., Jirtle, R.L.: Genomic imprinting: implications for human disease. Am. J. Pathol. 154, 635–647 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ferguson-Smith, A.C.: Genome imprinting: the emergence of an epigenetic paradigm. Nat. Rev. 12, 565–575 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Giannoukakis, N., Deal, C., Paquette, J., Goodyer, C.G., Polychronakos, C.: Parental genomic imprinting of the human IGF2 gene. Nat. Genet. 4, 98–101 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Goldstein, D.B.: Common genetic variation and human traits. N. Engl. J. Med. 360, 1696–1698 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gregg, C., Zhang, J., Weissbourd, B., Luo, S., Schroth, G.P., Haig, D., Dulac, C.: High-resolution analysis of parent-of-origin allelic expression in the mouse brain. Science 329, 643–648 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hager, R., Cheverud, J.M., Wolf, J.B.: Maternal effects as the cause of parent-of-origin effects that mimic genomic imprinting. Genetics 178, 1755–1762 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Haig, D.: Genetic conflicts in human pregnancy. Q. Rev. Biol. 68, 495–532 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Haig, D.: Evolutionary conflicts in pregnancy and calcium metabolism – a review. Placenta 25, S10–S15 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hardy, J., Singleton, A.: Genomewide association studies and human disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 360, 1759–1768 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Harney, S., Newton, J., Milicic, A., Brown, M.A., Wordsworth, B.P.: Non-inherited maternal HLA alleles are associated with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology 42, 171–174 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    He, F., Zhou, J.Y., Hu, Y.Q., Sun, F., Yang, J., Lin, S., Fung, W.K.: Detection of parent-of-origin effects for quantitative traits in complete and incomplete nuclear families with multiple children. Am. J. Epidemiol. 174, 226–233 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hindorff, L.A., Junkins, H.A., Hall, P.N., Mehta, J.P., Manolio, T.A.: A catalog of published genome-wide association studies. Available from www.genome.gov/gwastudies (2010). Accessed 15 Oct 2012Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hirschhorn, J.N.: Genomewide association studies – illuminating biologic pathways. N. Engl. J. Med. 360, 1699–1701 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Huang, B.E., Amos, C.I., Lin, D.Y.: Detecting haplotype effects in genomewide association studies. Genet. Epidemiol. 31, 803–812 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jamrozik, E.F., Knuiman, M.W., James, A., Divitini, M., Musk, A.W.: Risk factors for adult-onset asthma: a 14-year longitudinal study. Respirology 14(6), 814–821 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jamrozik, E.F., Warrington, N., Mcclenaghan, J., Hui, J., Musk, A.W., James, A., Beilby, J.P., Hansen, J., De Klerk, N.H., Palmer, L.J.: Funcational haplotypes in the PTGDR gene fail to associate with asthma in two Australian populations. Respirology 16, 359–366 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Janssens, A.C.J.W., Ioannidis, J.P.A., van Dujin, C.M., Little, J., Khoury, M.J.: Strengthening the reporting of genetic risk prediction studies: the GRIPS statement. Genome Med. 3, 16 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jensen, L.E., Etheredge, A.J., Brown, K.S., Mitchell, L.E., Whitehead, A.S.: Maternal genotype for the monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 A(-2518)G promotor polymorphism is associated with the risk of spina bifida in offspring. Am. J. Med. Genet. 140A, 1114–1118 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kong, A., Steinthorsdottir, V., Masson, G., et al.: Parental origin of sequence variants associated with complex diseases. Nature 462, 868–874 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kraft, P., Hunter, D.J.: Genetic risk prediction – are we there yet? N. Engl. J. Med. 360, 1701–1703 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Maher, B.: Personal genomes: the case of the missing heritability. Nature 456, 18–21 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Manolio, T.A.: Genomewide association studies and assessment of the risk of disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 363, 166–176 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Manolio, T.A., Collins, F.S., Cox, N.J., Goldstein, D.B., Hindorff, L.A., Hunter, D.J., McCarthy, M.I., Ramos, E.M., Cardon, L.R., Chakravarti, A., et al.: Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases. Nature 461, 747–753 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Morison, I.M., Paton, C.J., Cleverley, S.D.: The imprinted gene and parent-of-origin effect database. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, 275–276 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ober, C.: HLA and pregnancy: the paradox of the fetal allograft. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 62, 1–5 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Peltonen, L., Palotie, A., Lange, K.: Use of population isolates for mapping complex traits. Nat. Rev. Genet. 1, 182–190 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ploughman, L., Boehnke, M.: Estimating the power of a proposed linkage study for a complex genetic trait. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 44, 543–551 (1989)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Scuteri, A., Sanna, S., Chen, W., Uda, M., Albai, G., et al.: Genome-wide association scan shows genetic variants in the FTO gene are associated with obesity-related traits. PLoS Genet. 3(7), e1151 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Shete, S., Amos, C.I.: Testing for genetic linkage in families by a variance-components approach in the presence of genomic imprinting. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 70, 751–757 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Shi, M., Umbach, D.M., Vermeulen, S.H., Weinberg, C.R.: Making the most of case-mother/control-mother studies. Am. J. Epidemiol. 168, 541–547 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Sinsheimer, J.S., Palmer, C.G.S., Woodward, J.A.: Detecting genotype combinations that increase risk for disease: the maternal-fetal genotype incomparibility test. Genet. Epidemiol. 24, 1–13 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Splansky, G.L., Corey, D., Yang, Q., Atwood, L.D., Cupples, L.A., Benjamin, E.J., et al.: The Third Generation Cohort of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute’s Framingham Heart Study: design, recruitment, and initial examination. Am. J. Epidemiol. 165, 1328–1335 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Strachan, T., Read, A.P. (eds.): Human Molecular Genetics, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York (1999)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Thompson, E.E., Sun, Y. Nicolae, D., Ober, C.: Shades of gray: a comparison of linkage disequilibrium between Hutterites and Europeans. Genet. Epidemiol. 34, 133–139 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Van Buggenhout, G., Fryns, J.P.: Angelman syndrome (AS, MIM 105830). Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 17, 1367–1373 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    van den Oord, E.J.: The use of mixture models to perform quantitative tests for linkage disequilibrium, maternal effects, and parent-of-origin effects with incomplete subject-parent triads. Behav. Genet. 30, 335–343 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Vermeulen, S.H., Shi, M., Weinberg, C.R., Umbach, D.M.: A hybrid design: case-parent triads supplemented by control-mother dyads. Genet. Epidemiol. 33, 136–144 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Wang, X., Sun, Q., McGrath, S.D., Mardis, E.R., Soloway, P.D., Clark, A.G.: Transcriptome-wide identification of novel imprinted genes in neonatal mouse brain. PLoS One 3, e3839 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Weinberg, C.R.: Methods for detection of parent-of-origin effects in genetic studies of case-parents triads. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 65, 229–235 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Weinberg, C.R., Wilcox, A.J., Lie, R.T.: A log-linear approach to case-parent triad data: assessing effects of disease genes that act either directly or through maternal effects and that may be subjected to parental imprinting. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 62, 969–978 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Weinberg, C.R., Umbach, D.M.: A hybrid design for studying genetic influences on risk of diseases with onset early in life. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 77, 627–636 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Wilcox, A.J., Weinberg, C.R., Lie, R.T.: Distinguishing the effects of maternal and offspring genes through studies of case-parent triads. Am. J. Epidemiol. 148, 893–901 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Wittkopp, P.J., Haerum, B.K., Clark, A.G.: Parent-of-origin effects on mRNA expression in Drosophila melanogaster not caused by genomic imprinting. Genetics 173, 1817–1821 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Yang, J.: Likelihood approaches for detecting imprinting and maternal effects in family-based association studeis. Ph.D. dissertation, The Ohio State University (2010)Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Yang, J., Lin, S.: Detection of imprinting and heterogeneous maternal effects on high blood pressure using Framingham Heart Study data. BMC Proc. 3, S125 (2009)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Yang, J., Lin, S.: Likelihood approach for detecting imprinting and maternal effect using general pedigrees from prospective family-based association studies. Biometrics 68, 477–485 (2012)CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Yang, J., Lin, S.: Robust partial likelihood approach for detecting imprinting and maternal effects using case-control families. Ann. Appl. Stat. 7, 249–268 (2013)CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Yu, Z., Schaid, D.J.: Sequential haplotype scan methods for association analysis. Genet. Epidemiol. 31, 553–564 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Zhou, J., Hu, Y., Lin, S., Fung, W.K.: Detection of parent-of-origin effects based on complete and incomplete nuclear families with multiple affected children. Hum. Hered. 67, 1–12 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Zhou, J., Lin, S., Fung, W.K., Hu, Y.-Q.: Detection of parent-of-origin effects in complete and incomplete nuclear families with multiple affected children using multiple tightly linked markers. Hum. Hered. 67, 116–127 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Zhou, J., Ding, J., Fung, W.K., Lin, S.: Detection of parent-of-origin effects using general pedigree data. Genet. Epidemiol. 34, 151–158 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of StatisticsThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations