Skip to main content

Development of Group Understanding via the Construction of Physical and Technological Artifacts

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Productive Multivocality in the Analysis of Group Interactions

Part of the book series: Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series ((CULS,volume 15))

Abstract

The analyses reported in this chapter analyzed the development of group understanding along the dimensions of domain understanding and intersubjectivity based on the artifacts that a student group constructed during learning. In terms of the domain knowledge development, the analyses identified a progression of four circuit understandings, showing that the group’s understanding of electrical circuits became more sophisticated over time as the group considered additional ways to light the bulb(s). The four group understandings also differed in terms of the extent to which they were interactively constructed, so some were constructed mainly by pooling individual ideas while others were more or less co-constructed in the process of collaborative artifact construction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Börner, K., Contractor, N., Falk-Krzesinski, H. J., Fiore, S. M., Hall, K. L., Keyton, J., et al. (2010). A multi-level systems perspective for the science of team science. Commentary, 2(49), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (2001). Models of data: A theory of how people evaluate data. Cognition and Instruction, 19(3), 323–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3, pp. 59–83). New York, NY: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallyday, D., Resnick, R., & Walker, J. (2007). Fundamentals of physics. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Chernobilsky, E. (2007). CORDTRA: A representational lens for analyzing tool-mediated collaborative learning. Paper presented at the AERA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollan, J., Hutchins, E., & Kirsh, D. (2000). Distributed cognition: Toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7(2), 174–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeong, H. (2013). Verbal data analysis for understanding interactions. In C. Hmelo-Silver, A. M. O’Donnell, C. Chan, & C. Chinn (Eds.), The international handbook of collaborative learning. London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeong, H., Chen, W., & Looi, C. K. (2011). Analysis of group understanding in artifact-mediated discourse. In H. Spada, G. Stahl, N. Miyake & N. Law (Eds.), Connecting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning to Policy and Practice: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL 2011) (Vol. II, pp. 786-790). Hong Kong: International Society of the Learning Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kafai, Y. B. (2006). Constructionism. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozma, R. B., & Russell, J. (1997). Multimedia and understanding: Expert and novice responses to different representations of chemical phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(9), 949–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Looi, C. K., & Chen, W. (2010). Community-based individual knowledge construction in the classroom: A process-orientation account. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(3), 202–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matusov, E. (1996). Intersubjectivity without agreement. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3(1), 25–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1992). Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 535–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was presented in a workshop that was partially financed by the European STELLAR Network of Excellence (PF7). The analysis and writing of this chapter were supported by the grant from the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) (Grant No. 2009-0068919). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this chapter are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funding agency.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heisawn Jeong .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jeong, H. (2013). Development of Group Understanding via the Construction of Physical and Technological Artifacts. In: Suthers, D., Lund, K., Rosé, C., Teplovs, C., Law, N. (eds) Productive Multivocality in the Analysis of Group Interactions. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series, vol 15. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8960-3_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics