Abstract
Research in medical education is critical for demonstrating the effectiveness of educational interventions and for identifying new methods of teaching and assessment. Education research can facilitate the careful and systematic approach to educational innovations, bridge the gap between education theory and practice, and support policy changes. Research also allows us to study new advances in science and technology in order to clarify their benefit and identify how to best use this information to facilitate learning. Taking a scholarly approach to education research allows others to determine the value of an intervention. Additionally, given that we are often tasked with improving the efficiency and effectiveness of medical education, studying the impact of teaching and learning approaches provides important data to guide such improvements.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bordage G. Conceptual frameworks to illuminate and magnify. Med Educ. 2009;43(4):312–9.
Schwartz A, Pappas C, Bashook PG, et al. Conceptual frameworks in the study of duty hours changes in graduate medical education: a review. Acad Med. 2011;86(1):18–29.
McGaghie WC, Bordage G, Shea JS. Problem statement, conceptual framework, and research question. Acad Med. 2001;76(9):923–4.
Marks RG, Dawson-Saunders EK, Bailar JC, Dan BB, Verran JA. Interactions between statisticians and biomedical journal editors. Stat Med. 1988;7(10):1003–11.
Bordage G, Dawson B. Experimental study design and grant writing in eight steps and 28 questions. Med Educ. 2003;37(4):376–85.
Boet S, Sharma S, Goldman J, Reeves S. Review article: medical education research: an overview of methods. Can J Anaesth. 2012;59(2):159–70.
Beckman TJ, Cook DA. Developing scholarly projects in education: a primer for medical teachers. Med Teach. 2007;29(2–3):210–8.
Harwell MR. Research design in qualitative/quantitative/mixed methods. In: Conrad CF, Serlin RC, editors. The Sage handbook for research in education. 2nd ed. Los Angeles, CA: Sage; 2011. p. 147.
Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis. 2nd ed. Los Angeles, CA: Sage; 1994.
Dillman DA. Mail and internet surveys. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Wiley; 2000.
DeVellis RF. Scale development: theory and applications. 3rd ed. Los Angeles, CA: Sage; 2012.
Downing SM. Reliability: on the reproducibility of assessment data. Med Educ. 2004;38:1006–12.
Downing SM. Validity: on the meaningful interpretation of assessment data. Med Educ. 2003;37:830–7.
Trescot A, Lollo L, Stogicza A. Advanced Pain Life Support (APLS) simulation training for interventional pain physicians. MedEdPORTAL; 2012. Available from: www.mededportal.org/publication/9240
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fallar, R., Karani, R., Friedman, E. (2014). Research in Education. In: Frost, E. (eds) Comprehensive Guide to Education in Anesthesia. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8954-2_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8954-2_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-8953-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-8954-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)