Abstract
During the early days of graduate medical education, an apprenticeship model was followed, and evaluation was directly based on daily performance. As time evolved global assessment and high-stakes written examinations came to be the norm. With increasing pressure to demonstrate the impact of graduate medical education on outcome, there has been a movement toward assessment and selection of assessment tools with appropriate structure, objectivity, and validity. While the role of high-stakes examinations has not been eliminated, it is also clear that their impact does not necessarily encourage learning and may, in fact, discourage long-term retention of knowledge. There is increasing knowledge about the optimum characteristics of assessment tools and about the performance of these tools individually. An ideal assessment program contains multiple tools, is administered with timely feedback to the learner, and is designed to fit the learning environment. Options include audits, direct observation, mentorship, objective structured clinical examinations, oral exams, peer review, portfolio assessment, self-assessment, simulation, standardized patients, and written examinations. With upcoming changes in the accreditation process by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, time will be replaced by criteria for performance in advancement and promotion of residents, using “milestones.” Optimum assessment in anesthesiology residency is possible, but must overcome obstacles, including “I know it when I see it,” “studying to the test,” the halo effect, grade inflation, and the “hidden curriculum.” Evidence of success in the future may be obtained by programs based on the performance of their graduates.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Abbreviations
- ABA:
-
American Board of Anesthesiology
- ACGME:
-
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education
- AKT:
-
Anesthesia Knowledge Test
- AOS:
-
Area of strength
- CA-1:
-
Clinical anesthesia, year 1
- CA-2:
-
Clinical anesthesia, year 2
- CA-3:
-
Clinical anesthesia, year 3
- GME:
-
Graduate medical education
- ICU:
-
Intensive care unit
- ITE:
-
In-training examination
- MCQ:
-
Multiple choice question examination
- OSCE:
-
Objective structured clinical examination
- PACU:
-
Post-anesthesia care unit
- PBLI:
-
Practice-based learning and improvement
- RIME:
-
“Reporter,” “interpreter,” “manager,” or “educator”
- RRC:
-
Residency Review Committee
- SP:
-
Standard patient
- TAFI:
-
Targeted area for improvement
References
Loyd GE, Koenig HM. Assessment of learning outcomes. Summative evaluations. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2008;46:97–111.
Glance LG, Neuman M, Martinez EA, Pauker KY, Dutton RP. Performance measures at a “tipping point”. Anesth Analg. 2011;112:958–66.
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Common program requirements: general competencies. http://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/Portals/0/PFAssets/ProgramRequirements/CPRs2013.pdf. Accessed 23 Sep 2013.
Pangaro L. A new vocabulary and other innovations for improving descriptive in-training evaluations. Acad Med. 1999;74:1203–7.
Tetzlaff JE. Assessment of competence in anesthesiology. Anesthesiology. 2007;106:812–25.
Turnbull J, Gray J, MacFadyen J. Improving in-training evaluation programs. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13:317–23.
De Oliveira Filho GR, Vieira JE. The relationship of learning environment, quality of life, and study strategies measures to anesthesiology resident academic performance. Anesth Analg. 2007;104:1467–72.
Shumway JM, Harden RM. AMEE guide no. 25: The assessment of learning outcomes for the competent and reflective physician. Med Teach. 2003;25:569–84.
Friedman Ben-David M. AMEE guide no. 14: outcome-based education: part 3—assessment in outcome-based education. Med Teach. 1999;21:121–3.
Williams III RG. Use of NBME and USMLE examinations to evaluate medical education programs. Acad Med. 1993;68:748–52.
Norcini JJ, Swanson DB, Grosso LF, Shea JA, Webster GD. A comparison of knowledge, synthesis and clinical judgment: multiple choice questions in the assessment of physician competence. Eval Health Prof. 1984;7:485–500.
Slogoff S, Hughes FP. Validity of scoring “dangerous answers” on a written certification examination. J Med Educ. 1987;62:625–31.
Friedman Ben-David M. The role of assessment in expanding professional horizons. Med Teach. 2000;22:9–16.
Hawkins RE, Sumption KF, Gaglione MM, Holmbor ES. The in training examination in internal medicine: resident perceptions and the lack of correlation between resident score and faculty prediction of resident performance. Am J Med. 1999;106:206–10.
Wise S, Stagg L, Szucs R, Gay S, Mauger D, Hartman D. Assessment of resident knowledge: subjective assessment versus performance on the ACR in-training examination. Acad Radiol. 1999;6:66–71.
Schwartz RW, Donnelly MB, Sloan DA, Johnson SB, Strodel WE. Assessing senior residents’ knowledge and performance: an integrated evaluation program. Surgery. 1994;116:634–40.
Baker K. Clinical teaching improves with resident evaluation and feedback. Anesthesiology. 2010;113:693–703.
Norman GR, van der Vleuten CPM, de Graffe E. Pitfalls in the pursuit of objectivity: issues of validity, efficiency and acceptability. Med Educ. 1991;25:119–26.
Pangaro LN. Investing in descriptive evaluation: a vision for the future of assessment. Med Teach. 2000;22:478–81.
Hemmer PA, Pangaro LN. The effect of formal evaluation sessions during clinical clerkships in better identifying students with marginal fund of knowledge. Acad Med. 1997;72:641–3.
Hemmer PA, Hawkins R, Jackson JL, Pangaro LN. Assessing how well three evaluation methods detect deficiencies in medical students’ professionalism in two settings of an internal medicine clerkship. Acad Med. 2000;75:167–73.
Lavin B, Pangaro LN. Internship ratings as a validity measure for an evaluation system to identify inadequate clerkship performance. Acad Med. 1998;75:998–1002.
Rose SH, Burkle CM. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education competencies and the American Board of Anesthesiology Clinical Competence Committee: a comparison. Anesth Analg. 2006;102:212–6.
Baker K. Determining resident performance. Getting beyond the noise. Anesthesiology. 2011;115:862–78.
Tetzlaff JE. Assessment of competence in anesthesiology. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2009;22:809–13.
Wainwright JR, Sullivan FM, Morrison JM, MacNaughton RJ, McConnadrie A. Audit encourages an evidence-based approach to medical practice. Med Educ. 1999;33:907–14.
Epstein RM. Assessment in medical education. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:387–96.
Noel G, Herbers J, Caplow M, Cooper G, Pangaro L, Harvey J. How well do internal medicine faculty members evaluate the clinical skills of residents? Ann Intern Med. 1992;117(9):757–65.
Herberts J, Gordon N, Cooper G, Harvey J, Pangaro L, Weaver M. How accurate are faculty evaluations of clinical competence? J Gen Intern Med. 1989;4:202–8.
Cydulka RK, Emerman CL, Jouriles NJ. Evaluation of resident performance and intensive bedside teaching during direct observation. Acad Emerg Med. 1996;3:345–51.
Connor MP, Bynoe AG, Redfern N, Pokora J, Clarke J. Developing senior doctors as mentors: a form of continuing professional development. Report of an initiative to develop a network of senior doctors as mentors: 1994–99. Med Educ. 2000;34:747–53.
MacRae H, Regehr G, Leadbetter W, Reznick R. A comprehensive examination for senior surgery residents. Am J Surg. 2000;179:190–3.
Bann S, Datta V, Khan M, Darzi A. The surgical error examination is a novel method for objective technical knowledge assessment. Am J Surg. 2003;185(6):507–11.
Boulet JR, Murray D, Kras J, Woodhouse J, McAllister J, Ziv A. Reliability and validity of a simulation-based acute care skills assessment for medical students and residents. Anesthesiology. 2003;99(6):1270–80.
Berkenstadt H, Ziv A, Gafni N, Sidi A. Incorporating simulation-based objective structured clinical examination into the Israeli national board examination in anesthesiology. Anesth Analg. 2006;102:853–8.
Schubert A, Tetzlaff JE, Licina M, Mascha E, Smith MP. Organization of a comprehensive anesthesiology oral practice examination program: planning, structure, startup, administration, growth and evaluation. J Clin Anesth. 1999;11:504–18.
Jacobsohn E, Klock PA, Avidan M. Poor inter-rater reliability on mock anesthesia oral examinations. Can J Anaesth. 2006;53:659–68.
Eagle CJ, Martineau R, Hamilton K. The oral examination in anesthetic resident evaluation. Can J Anaesth. 1993;40:947–53.
Dannefer EF, Henson LC, Bierer SB, Grady-Weliky TA, Meldrum S, Nofziger AC, Barclay C, Epstein RM. Peer assessment of professional competence. Med Educ. 2005;39:713–22.
Ramsey PG, Wenrich MD, Carline JD, et al. Use of peer ratings to evaluate physician performance. JAMA. 1993;269:1655–60.
Delphin E, Davidson M. Teaching and evaluating group competency in systems-based practice in anesthesiology. Anesth Analg. 2008;106:1837–43.
O’Sullivan PS, Cogbill KK, McClain T, Reckase MD, Clardy JA. Portfolios as a novel approach for residency evaluation. Acad Psychiatry. 2002;26:173–9.
Friedman Ben-David M, Davis MH, Harden RM, Howie PW, Ker J, Pippard MJ. AMEE medical education guide no. 24: portfolios as a method of student assessment. Med Teach. 2001;23:535–51.
O’Sullivan P, Greene C. Portfolios: possibilities for addressing emergency medicine resident competencies. Acad Emerg Med. 2002;9:1305–9.
Houben KW, van den Hombergh CLM, Stalmeijer RE, Scherpbier AJ, Marcus MAE. New training strategies for anaesthesia residents. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2011;24:682–6.
Driessen EW, van Tartwijk J, Overeem K, Vermunt JD, van der Vleuten CPM. Conditions for successful reflective use of portfolios in undergraduate medical education. Med Educ. 2005;39:1230–5.
Parboosingh J. Learning portfolios: potential to assist health professionals with self-directed learning. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 1996;16:75–81.
Davis DA, Mazmanian PE, Fordis M, Harrison RV, Thorpe KE, Perrier L. Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: a systematic review. JAMA. 2006;296:1094–102.
Schartel SA, Metro DG. Evaluation: measuring performance, ensuring competence, achieving long-term excellence. Anesthesiology. 2010;112:519–20.
Boet S, Bould MD, Bruppacher HR, Desjardins F, Chandra DB, Naik VN. Looking in the mirror: self-debriefing versus instructor debriefing for simulated crises. Crit Care Med. 2011;39:1377–81.
Weller JM, Robinson BJ, Jolly B, Watterson LM, Joseph M, Bajenov S, Haughton AJ, Larsen PD. Psychometric characteristics of simulation-based assessment in anaesthesia and accuracy of self-assessed score. Anaesthesia. 2005;60:245–50.
LeBlanc VR. Review article: simulation in anesthesia: state of the science and looking forward. Can J Anaesth. 2012;59:193–202.
Mudumbai SC, Gaba DM, Boulet JR, Howard SK, Davies MF. External validation of simulation-based assessment with other performance measures of third-year anesthesiology residents. Simul Healthc. 2012;7:73–80.
Gaba DM, Howard SK, Flanagan B, Smith BE, Fish KJ, Botney R. Assessment of clinical performance during simulated crises using both technical and behavioral ratings. Anesthesiology. 1998;89(1):8–18.
Murray DJ, Boulet JR, Kras JF, Woodhouse JA, Cox T, McAllister JD. Acute care skills in anesthesia practice: a simulation-based resident performance assessment. Anesthesiology. 2004;101(5):1084–95.
Schwid HA, Rooke GA, Carline J, Steadman RH, Murray WB, Olympio M, Tarver S, Steckner K, Wetstone S; Anesthesia Simulator Research Consortium. Evaluation of anesthesia residents using mannequin-based simulation: a multi-institutional study. Anesthesiology. 2002;97(6):1434–44.
Helmreich RL, Davies JM. Anaesthetic simulation and lessons to be learned from aviation. Can J Anaesth. 1997;44:907–12.
Murray DJ, Boulet JR, Avidan M, Kras JF, Henrichs D, Woodhouse J. Performance of residents and anesthesiologists in a simulation-based skill assessment. Anesthesiology. 2007;107:705–13.
Fehr JJ, Boulet JR, Waldrop WB, Snider R, Brockel M, Murray DJ. Simulation-based assessment of pediatric anesthesia skills. Anesthesiology. 2011;115:1308–15.
Boulet JR, Murray D. Review article: assessment in anesthesiology education. Can J Anaesth. 2012;59:182–92.
Waldrop WB, Murray DJ, Boulet JR, Kras JF. Management of anesthesia equipment failure: a simulation-based resident skill assessment. Anesth Analg. 2009;109:426–33.
Pott LM, Santrock D. Teaching without a teacher: developing competencies with a Bullard laryngoscope using only a structured self-learning course and practicing on a mannequin. J Clin Anesth. 2007;19:583–6.
Savoldelli GL, Naik VN, Joo HS, Houston PL, Graham M, Yee B, Hamstra SJ. Evaluation of patient simulator performance as an adjunct to the oral examination for senior anesthesia residents. Anesthesiology. 2006;104:475–81.
Gallagher CJ, Tan JM. The current status of simulation in the maintenance of certification. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2010;48:83–99.
Steadman RH, Huang YM. Simulation for quality assurance in training, credentialing and maintenance of certification. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2012;26:3–15.
Kearney RA, Sullivan P, Skakun E. Performance on ABA-ASA in-training examination predicts success for RCPSC certification. Can J Anaesth. 2000;47:914–8.
Berner ES, Brooks CM, Erdmann IV JB. Use of the USMLE to select residents. Acad Med. 1993;68:753–9.
Nasca TJ, Philibert I, Brigham T, Flynn TC. The next GME accreditation system—rationale and benefits. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1051–6.
Yeates P, O’Neill P, Mann K, Eva KW. Effect of exposure to good versus poor medical trainee performance on attending physician ratings of subsequent performances. JAMA. 2012;308:2226–32.
Asch DA, Epstein A, Nicholson S. Evaluating medical training programs by the quality of care delivered by their alumni. JAMA. 2007;298:1049–51.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tetzlaff, J.E. (2014). Evaluation of Anesthesiology Residents. In: Frost, E. (eds) Comprehensive Guide to Education in Anesthesia. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8954-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8954-2_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-8953-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-8954-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)