Skip to main content

Violence and Extremism: Sources of Sectarian Violence in Baghdad

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 827 Accesses

Part of the book series: Peace Psychology Book Series ((PPBS))

Abstract

This Chapter integrates multiple empirical explanations about the causes of sectarian and ethnic conflict and settles on constructivism as the “middle-ground” theoretical framework for introducing the nature of religious and tribal identity in Iraq. This Chapter explores several deeply rooted causes of sectarian conflict in Iraq including the nature of religious and tribal identity and the Sunni–Shi’a fracture to which many attribute sectarian violence. However, the Chapter concludes by pointing toward more proximate causes of violent conflict in Iraq: the cultural context of the modern Iraqi state, influential roles played by religious and political figures, and the structural, political, and economic sources of internal conflict present in Iraq prior to the US invasion.

“Violence, even well intentioned, always rebounds upon oneself.”

Lao Tzu

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Per Jeffrey Checkel’s admonition that constructivist scholarship should focus on delimited aspects of the social world in order to generate ‘middle range’ theories of the actors and mechanisms bringing about change.

  2. 2.

    The connection between language and social relations is often contested and is far too complex a topic to dwell on here. For differing perspectives on the question of whether language embodies or constitutes social relations (or both), see [14, 15].

  3. 3.

    Robert Kaplan, in his dispatches for The Atlantic and in his Balkan Ghosts: A Journey Through History (New York: St. Martin’s 1993), and (writing mainly on large-scale conflict) Samuel P. Huntington, in "The Clash of Civilizations?" Foreign Affairs 72 (Summer 1993): 22–49.

  4. 4.

    Brown (2001). Ethnic and Internal Conflicts.

  5. 5.

    Middens 1990.

  6. 6.

    Pruitt and Kim 2004: 29. See also Gaertner & Dovido 2000; Tajfel and Turner 1979.

  7. 7.

    Pruitt and Kim, 2004: 29, emphasis mine. Underpinning the division of people into ‘us’ and ‘them’ is the universal and biologically rooted tendency toward social categorization, a cognitive mechanism for dividing the world into separate categories so as to bring order to the enormous array of stimuli encountered. Thus, the process of designating someone as a member of one’s own group (i.e., the in-group) or not (i.e., a member of an out group) is one that occurs almost automatically.

  8. 8.

    Tajfel and Turner 1986.

  9. 9.

    The importance of social identity is paramount in the study of human relationships, though social scientists lack cross-disciplinary agreement on its meaning. Well known to psychologists and sociologists is Tajfel’s social identity theory (SIT) and accompanying definition of social identity as “that part of an individual’s self-concept which derives from his knowledge of his membership in a social group (or groups) together with the value and emotional significant attached to that membership” (1981, 255).

  10. 10.

    Stereotypes are cognitive structures that contain simplified and highly categorical information about a person, group, place, or thing. Although stereotypes aid our cognitive sorting system in perceiving, encoding, storing, and retrieving social data, they are highly simplified versions of reality that ignore the great variability that exists among people in any given group.

  11. 11.

    Although Shi’a Muslims are the majority in Iran and Iraq (and large minority communities live in Yemen, Bahrain, Syria, and Lebanon), 80 % of the world’s Muslim population are Sunni.

References

  1. Ross, M.H. 2007. Cultural contestation in ethnic conflict, 24. Cambridge: MA Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Kriesberg, L., and B.W. Dayton. 2012. Constructive conflicts: From escalation to resolution, 23. Lanham: Rowman and Littelfield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jackson, R. 2009. Constructivism and conflict resolution. In The SAGE handbook of conflict resolution, ed. J. Bercovitch, V. Kremenyuk, and I. Zartman, 172–192. London: SAGE Publications.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Franklin, C. 1995. Expanding the vision of the social constructionist debates: Creating relevance for practitioners. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Service 76(6): 395–407.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Giddens, A. 1979. Central problems in social theory. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hollis, Martin. 2008. The philosophy of social science: An introduction, 144. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Little, D. 1991. Varieties of social explanation: An introduction to the philosophy of social science. Oxford: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mustafa, E.M., and A. Mische. 1998. What is agency? American Journal of Sociology 103(4): 971.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Henkin, L. 1979. How nations behave: Law and foreign policy. New York: University of Columbia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Thomas, F. 1990. The power of legitimacy among nations. Nations comply when rules are perceived as legitimate. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Martha, F. 2003. The purpose of intervention: Changing beliefs about the use of force. London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lumsdaine, D.H. 1993. Moral vision in international politics: The foreign aid regime, 1949–1989. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Klowert, P., and J. Legro. 1996. Norms identity and their limits. In The Culture of national security, norms and identity in world politics, ed. P. Katzenstein, 463. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bourdieu, P. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Trans. Gino Raymond and Matthew Adamson. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Irvine, J. 1989. When talk isnt cheap: Language and political economy. American Ethnologist 16: 248–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Briggs, C. 1996. Disorderly discourse: Narrative, conflict and inequality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Phelp, M. 2005. Transforming conflict narratives. Conference proceedings of the 2005 National Organizational Development Conference. Retrieved athttp://www.equalvoice.com/WelpODNConferenceProceeding.pdf.

  18. MacGinty, R. 2013. Routledge handbook of peacebuilding, 96. New York: Routledge Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ross, M.H. 2002. The political psychology of competing narratives: September 11 and beyond. In Understanding September 11, ed. C. Calhoun, P. Price, and A. Timmer, 303–320. New York: New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bowen, J.R. 1996. The myth of global ethnic conflict. Journal of Democracy 7(4): 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Brown, Michael. 2001. Ethnic and internal conflicts: Causes and implications. In Turbulent peace: The challenges of managing international conflict, ed. C.A. Crocker, and F.O. Hampson. Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Stein, J. 2001. Image, identity and conflict resolution. In Turbulent peace: The challenges of managing international conflict, ed. C.A. Crocker, and F.O. Hampson, 191. Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace Press.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bertochhi, G. 2010. The empirical determinants of state fragility. Retrieved from http://www.voxeu.org/article/determinants-state-fragility. This study found insignificant effects for economic determinants of state fragility (including per capita GDP (both levels and growth rates), investment, government expenditures, human capital, trade openness, and inflation) as well as geographic and historical variables related to colonialism.

  24. Azar, E. 1990. The management of protracted social conflict: Theory and cases, 7. Aldershot: Dartmouth.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Slim, H. 2008. Killing civilians: Method, madness and morality in war, 123. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wilmer, F. 2002. The social construction of man, the state and war: Identity, conflict and violence in the former yugoslavia, 63. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ashmore, R.D., L. Jussim, and D. Wilder. 2001. Social identity, intergroup conflict and conflict reduction, 66. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Esman, M. 1994. Ethnic Politics, 14. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Merskin, Deborah. 2004. The construction of arabs as enemies: Post September 11 discourse of George W. Bush. Mass Communication & Society 7(2): 157–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Keen, Sam. 1986. Faces of the enemy: Reflections of hostile imagination. Bowker: 13.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Brewer, Marilynn. 2001. “Ingroup identification and intergroup conflict”. In Social Identity, Intergroup conflict and Conflict Reduction.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Slim, Hugo. 2010. Killing civilians: Method, madness and morality in war. New York: Columbia University Press, 6.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Bartos, Ottmar, Wehr, Paul, 2002. Understanding conflict theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 131.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hogg, M.A., and K.D. Williams. 2000. From I to we: Social identity and the collective self. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 4: 81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Simpson, George. 1993. Durkheim, Emile. Trans. The Division of Labour in Society. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kenneth Allan, Kenneth D. Allan. 2005. Explorations in classical sociological theory: Seeing the social world. Pine Forge Press, 137.

    Google Scholar 

  37. McDougaall, William. 1920. The group Mind. New York: Arno Press, 1973 [©1920].

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lewin, K. 1948. Resolving social conflicts; selected papers on group dynamics. In ed. Gertrude W. Lewin, 165. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Kaufmann, Stuart, and Modern Hatreds. 2001. The symbolic politics of ethnic war. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Avruch, Kevin. 1998. Culture and conflict resolution, 10. Washington DC: United States Institute for Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Avruch, Kevin. 2013. Context and pretext in conflict resolution: Culture, identity, power and practice, 12. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Braude. 2003. The New Iraq, 19. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Luomi, M. 2008. Sectarian identities or geopolitics? The regional Shi’a-Sunni divide in the middle East. Helskinki: Finnish Institute of International Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Rubin, M. 2006. Iran against the Arabs. The Wall Street Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Stansfield, G. 2009. What were the causes and consequences of Iraq’s descent into violence after the initial invasion? Submission to the Iraq inquiry, 1–9. Retrieved from http://www.iraqinquiry.org.uk/media/37048/stansfield-submission.pdf.

  46. Tripp, C. 2009. A history of Iraq, 296. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Avruch, K. 2001. Culture and conflict. In Conflict: From analysis to intervention, ed. S. Cheldelin, D. Druckman, and L. Fast, 143. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Silvernman, A. 2009. Religion and politics in Iraq: What kind of sectarianism really exists? Informed comment. Retrieved from http://www.juancole.com/2009/08/religion-and-politics-in-iraq-what-type.html.

  49. Baram, A. 1997. Neo-tribalism in Iraq: Saddam Husayn’s tribal policies, 1991–1996. International Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 29: 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Khan, J. 2007. The Iraqi tribal structure. Perspectives on terrorism. Perspectives on terrorism 1(1). Retreived from http://www.terrorismanalysts.com/pt/index.php/pot/article/view/2/html.

  51. Silverman, A.L. 2009. Religion and politics in Iraq: What types of sectarianism really exists? Informed comment: Thoughts on the middle East, history and religion. Retreived from http://www.juancole.com/2009/08/religion-and-politics-in-iraq-what-type.html.

  52. Wardi, A. 2008. Understanding Iraq: Society, culture and personality, 115. New York: Edwin Mellon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Marr, P. 2008. The modern history of Iraq, II. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Mattingly, T. 2007. Arabs, tribes, Iraq and Islam. Retreived at http://www.patheos.com/blogs/getreligion/2007/01/arabs-tribes-iraq-and-islam/.

  55. Jesmeen, K. 2007. The Iraqi tribal structure: Background and influence on counter-terrorism. Perspectives on Terrorism 1(1).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Tripp, C. 2007. A history of Iraq, 3rd ed, 3. New York: Cambrige Univeristy Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ami C. Carpenter .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Carpenter, A.C. (2014). Violence and Extremism: Sources of Sectarian Violence in Baghdad. In: Community Resilience to Sectarian Violence in Baghdad. Peace Psychology Book Series. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8812-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics