Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Virtuous Circle of the Quantified Self: A Human Computational Approach to Improved Health Outcomes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Human Computation

Abstract

Historically, the ability of people diagnosed with medical conditions to meet and organize has been restricted to real-world support groups and exchanges of support. The pre-web Internet digitized these interactions to allow patients to communicate from the comfort of their homes and a time of their choosing. More recently, the era of the social network, “big data”, and ubiquitous electronic devices have combined with the patient empowerment movement to create a number of opportunities in human computation. Today, patients with serious illnesses are sharing their medical data online whether it is their genetic profile, treatments, symptoms, outcomes, or treatment evaluations. They are not only contributing to research by donating their data, they are mobilizing to conduct their own research in ways that can circumvent and even outpace the traditional medical establishment. Most significantly for the existing system, patients have shown that through their distributed human computation they can predict the outcome of clinical trials, one of the most expensive parts of the healthcare research process that can cost anywhere from $300 m to $1.2b to run and which could mean the balance of power will shift from patients as “subjects” to truly becoming informed and empowered participants. In this chapter we consider the history of the online patient movement, recent advances in distributed data collection and analysis by those with serious illness, the benefits accruing in the “virtuous circle” of condition-orientated human computation, the burgeoning availability of continuous sensor networks through smartphones, and briefly consider some of the risks and limitations of current approaches.

“What I’ve found to be most amazing about these forums thus far is the ability of patients to identify common side effects, formulate solutions, test them, and confirm their general efficacy all in a matter of days, when it would take researchers weeks or even months to generate the same knowledge.”—Patient with ALS discussing potential treatments on the forum of the ALS Therapy Development Institute (ALSTDI www.als.net )

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Armon C (2010) Is the lithium-for-ALS genie back in the bottle? Neurology 75:586–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayers JW, Althouse BM, Allem J-P, Rosenquist JN, Ford DE (2013) Seasonality in seeking mental health information on Google. Am J Prev Med 44(5):520–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basch E (2012) Beyond the FDA PRO guidance: steps toward integrating meaningful patient-reported outcomes into regulatory trials and US drug labels. Value Health 15(3):401–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basch E, Abernethy AP, Mullins CD, Reeve BB, Smith ML, Coons SJ et al (2012) Recommendations for incorporating patient-reported outcomes into clinical comparative effectiveness research in adult oncology. J Clin Oncol 30(34):4249–4255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck AT, Ward C, Mendelson M (1961) Beck depression inventory (BDI). Arch Gen Psychiatry 4(6):561–571

    Google Scholar 

  • Bessière K, Pressman S, Kiesler S, Kraut R (2010) Effects of internet use on health and depression: a longitudinal study. J Med Internet Res 12(1):e6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bove R, Secor E, Healy BC, Musallam A, Vaughan T (2013) Evaluation of an online platform for multiple sclerosis research: patient description, validation of severity scale, and exploration of BMI effects on disease course. PLoS One 8(3): e59707

    Google Scholar 

  • Call J, Scherzer NJ, Josephy PD, Walentas C (2010) Evaluation of self-reported progression and correlation of Imatinib dose to survival in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors: an open cohort study. J Gastrointest Cancer 41(1):60–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cedarbaum JM, Stambler N, Malta E, Fuller C (1999) The ALSFRS-R: a revised ALS functional rating scale that incorporates assessments of respiratory function. BDNF ALS Study Group (Phase III). (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10540002) Journal of the Neurological Sciences 1999 Oct 31;169(1-2):13–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Crocco AG, Villasis-Keever M, Jadad AR (2002) Analysis of cases of harm associated with use of health information on the internet. J Am Med Assoc 287(21):2869–2871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • deBronkart D (2009) Imagine someone had been managing your data, and then you looked. e-patients.net

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugas AF, Jalalpour M, Gel Y, Levin S, Torcaso F, Igusa T et al (2013) Influenza forecasting with Google Flu Trends. PLoS One 8(2):e56176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson N, Macpherson JM, Tung JY, Hon LS, Naughton B, Saxonov S et al (2010) Web-based, participant-driven studies yield novel genetic associations for common traits. PLoS Genet 6(6):e1000993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenbach G (2003) The impact of the Internet on cancer outcomes. CA Cancer J Clin 53(6):356–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson T (2007) e-patients: how they can help us heal healthcare. Patient Advocacy for Health Care Quality: Strategies for Achieving Patient-Centered Care 93–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Food US. Drug Administration (2009) Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures—Use in medical product development to support labeling claims. Fed Regist 74(235):65132–65133

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornai F et al. (2008) Lithium delays progression of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105.6: 2052–2057

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost JH, Massagli MP, Wicks P, Heywood J (2008). How the social web supports patient experimentation with a new therapy: The demand for patient-controlled and patient-centered informatics. In AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings (Vol. 2008, p. 217). American Medical Informatics Association

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabler NB, Duan N, Vohra S, Kravitz RL (2011) N-of-1 trials in the medical literature: a systematic review. Med Care 49(8):761–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guyatt GH, Haynes RB, Jaeschke RZ, Cook DJ (2000) Users “Guides to the medical Literature XXV. Evidence-based medicine: principles for applying the users” Guides to Patient Care. J Am Med Assoc 284(10):1290–1296

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoch D, Ferguson T (2005) What I’ve learned from E-patients. PLoS Med 2(8):e206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoch DB, Norris D, Lester JE, Marcus AD (1999) Information exchange in an epilepsy forum on the World Wide Web. Seizure 8(1):30–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jha AK (2010) Meaningful use of electronic health records. The J Am Med Assoc 304(15): 1709–1710

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiefer AK, Tung JY, Do CB, Hinds DA, Mountain JL, Francke U et al (2013) Genome-wide analysis points to roles for extracellular matrix remodeling, the visual cycle, and neuronal development in myopia. PLoS Genet 9(2):e1003299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lester J, Prady S, Finegan Y, Hoch D (2004) Learning from e-patients at Massachusetts general hospital. Br Med J 328:1188–1190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little MA, McSharry PE, Hunter EJ, Spielman J, Ramig LO (2009) Suitability of dysphonia measurements for telemonitoring of Parkinson’s disease. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 56(4):1015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meier A, Lyons EJ, Frydman G, Forlenza M, Rimer BK (2007) How cancer survivors provide support on cancer-related Internet mailing lists. J Med Internet Res 9(2):12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesa RA, Niblack J, Wadleigh M, Verstovsek S, Camoriano J, Barnes S et al (2007) The burden of fatigue and quality of life in myeloproliferative disorders (MPDs): an international Internet-based survey of 1179 MPD patients. Cancer 109(1):68–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michael Bowling J, Rimer BK, Lyons EJ, Golin CE, Frydman G, Ribisl KM (2006) Methodologic challenges of e-health research. Eval Program Plann 29(4):390–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller RGR, Mitchell JDJ, Moore DHD (2012) Riluzole for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)/motor neuron disease (MND). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD001447–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy TF (2004) Case studies biomedical research ethics. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Nazi KM, Hogan TP, McInnes DK, Woods SS, Graham G (2013) Evaluating patient access to electronic health records: results from a survey of veterans. Med Care 51(3 Suppl 1):S52–S56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Policy A (2011) Professionalism in the use of social media. J Am Med Assoc

    Google Scholar 

  • Rheingold H (1993) The virtual community: homesteading on the electronic frontier. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross SE, Todd J, Moore LA, Beaty BL, Wittevrongel L, Lin C-T (2005) Expectations of patients and physicians regarding patient-accessible medical records. J Med Internet Res 7(2):e13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouleau CR, von Ranson KM (2011) Potential risks of pro-eating disorder websites. Clin Psychol Rev 31(4):525–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santanello NC, Barber BL, Reiss TF, Friedman BS, Juniper EF, Zhang J (1997) Measurement characteristics of two asthma symptom diary scales for use in clinical trials. Eur Respir J 10(3):646–651

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone AA, Shiffman S, Schwartz JE, Broderick JE (2003) Patient compliance with paper and electronic diaries. Control Clin Trials 24(2):182–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan M (2012) Crowdsourced health research studies: an important emerging complement to clinical trials in the public health research ecosystem. J Med Internet Res 14(2):e46

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Swan M, Hathaway K, Hogg C, McCauley R (2010) Citizen science genomics as a model for crowdsourced preventive medicine research. Journal of Participatory Medicine 2 (2010): e20

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarlov AR, Trust PM (1989) The medical outcomes study: an application of methods for monitoring the results of medical care

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsanas A (2010) New nonlinear markers and insights into speech signal degradation for effective tracking of Parkinson’s disease symptom severity. Age (years)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsanas A, Little MA, McSharry PE, Spielman J, Ramig LO (2012) Novel speech signal processing algorithms for high-accuracy classification of Parkinson’s disease. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng IEEE 59(5):1264–1271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van De Belt TH, Engelen LJLPG, Berben SAA, Schoonhoven L (2010) Definition of health 2.0 and medicine 2.0: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res 12(2):e18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldron VR, Lavitt M, Kelley D (2000) The nature and prevention of harm in technology-mediated self-help settings: three exemplars. J Technol Hum Serv 17(2–3): 267–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicks P (2007) Excessive yawning is common in the bulbar-onset form of ALS. Acta Psychiatr Scand 116(1):76; authorreply76–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicks P, Abrahams S, Masi D (2007) Prevalence of depression in a 12‐month consecutive sample of patients with ALS. Eur J Neurol 14(9):993–1001

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicks P, Massagli MP, Wolf C (2009) Measuring function in advanced ALS: validation of ALSFRS‐EX extension items. Eur J Neurol 16(3):353–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicks P, Massagli M, Frost J, Brownstein C, Okun S, Vaughan T et al (2010) Sharing health data for better outcomes on PatientsLikeMe. J Med Internet Res 12(2):e19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wicks P, Vaughan TE, Massagli MP, Heywood J (2011) Accelerated clinical discovery using self-reported patient data collected online and a patient-matching algorithm. Nat Biotechnol 29(5):411–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wicks P, Keininger DL, Massagli MP, la Loge de C, Brownstein C, Isojärvi J et al (2012) Perceived benefits of sharing health data between people with epilepsy on an online platform. Epilepsy Behav 23(1):16–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. PatientsLikeMe, Lichfield, UK

    Paul Wicks Ph.D.

  2. Aston University, Aston, UK

    Max Little Ph.D.

Authors
  1. Paul Wicks Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Max Little Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Wicks Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. ThinkSplash, LLC, Fairfax, Virginia, USA

    Pietro Michelucci

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wicks, P., Little, M. (2013). The Virtuous Circle of the Quantified Self: A Human Computational Approach to Improved Health Outcomes. In: Michelucci, P. (eds) Handbook of Human Computation. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8806-4_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8806-4_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-8805-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-8806-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation