Advertisement

Totally Robotic Low Anterior Resection

Chapter

Abstract

To maximize the advantages of robotic surgical system, we have developed a single-stage totally robotic low anterior resection (LAR) for rectal cancer and improved this technique to further facilitate easy and safe operations. Compared with the hybrid technique, it can potentially offer better preservation of autonomic nerves during vascular dissection and easier mobilization of splenic flexure. Very few limitations specific to totally robotic LAR exist.

The current evidence suggests that robotic rectal cancer resection was associated with longer operating time but could potentially provide better short-term outcomes including lower conversion rate, lower circumferential margin positivity, and better functional preservation. Although the initial reports are promising, multicenter, randomized clinical trials are essential to verify long-term oncological and functional benefits of this new technology.

Keywords

Rectal Cancer Total Mesorectal Excision Robotic Surgery Rectal Cancer Surgery Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Weber PA, Merola S, Wasielewski A, Ballantyne GH. Telerobot-assisted laparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomies for benign disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45:1689–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    D'Annibale A, Morpurgo E, Fiscon V, Trevisan P, Sovernigo G, Orsini C, Guidolin D. Robotic and laparoscopic surgery for treatment of colorectal diseases. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:2162–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anvari M, Birch DW, Bamehriz F, Gryfe R, Chapman T. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2004;14:311–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rawlings AL, Woodland JH, Vegunta RK, Crawford DL. Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:1701–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Choi DJ, Kim SH, Lee PJ, Kim J, Woo SU. Single-stage totally robotic dissection for rectal cancer surgery: technique and short-term outcome in 50 consecutive patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52:1824–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baik SH, Kwon HY, Kim JS, Hur H, Sohn SK, Cho CH, Kim H. Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a prospective comparative study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:1480–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Patriti A, Ceccarelli G, Bartoli A, Spaziani A, Biancafarina A, Casciola L. Short- and medium-term outcome of robot-assisted and traditional laparoscopic rectal resection. JSLS. 2009;13:176–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bianchi PP, Ceriani C, Locatelli A, Spinoglio G, Zampino MG, Sonzogni A, Crosta C, Andreoni B. Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a comparative analysis of oncological safety and short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:2888–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Baek JH, McKenzie S, Garcia-Aguilar J, Pigazzi A. Oncologic outcomes of robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2010;251:882–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Park JS, Choi GS, Lim KH, Jang YS, Jun SH. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for Low rectal cancer: case-matched analysis of short-term outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:3195–202.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kwak JM, Kim SH, Kim J, Son DN, Baek SJ, Cho JS. Robotic vs. laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcomes of a case control study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54:151–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pigazzi A, Luca F, Patriti A, Valvo M, Ceccarelli G, Casciola L, Biffi R, Garcia-Aguilar J, Baek JH. Multicentric study on robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:1614–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Spinoglio G, Summa M, Priora F, Quarati R, Testa S. Robotic colorectal surgery: first 50 cases experience. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:1627–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jayne DG, Brown JM, Thorpe H, Walker J, Quirke P, Guillou PJ. Bladder and sexual function following resection for rectal cancer in a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open technique. Br J Surg. 2005;92:1124–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Quah HM, Jayne DG, Eu KW, Seow-Choen F. Bladder and sexual dysfunction following laparoscopically assisted and conventional open mesorectal resection for cancer. Br J Surg. 2002;89:1551–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Delgado S, Momblán D, Salvador L, Bravo R, Castells A, Ibarzabal A, Piqué JM, Lacy AM. Laparoscopic-assisted approach in rectal cancer patients: lessons learned from >200 patients. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:1457–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dulucq JL, Wintringer P, Stabilini C, Mahajna A. Laparoscopic rectal resection with anal sphincter preservation for rectal cancer: long-term outcome. Surg Endosc. 2005;19:1468–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Delgado S, Momblán D, Salvador L, Bravo R, Castells A, Ibarzabal A, Piqué JM, Lacy AM. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;365:1718–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rottoli M, Bona S, Rosati R, Elmore U, Bianchi PP, Spinelli A, Bartolucci C, Montorsi M. Laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer: effects of conversion on short-term outcome and survival. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:1279–86.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sigurdson ER. Lymph node dissection: is it diagnostic or therapeutic? J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:965–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Compton CC, Fielding LP, Burgart LJ, Conley B, Cooper HS, Hamilton SR, Hammond ME, Henson DE, Hutter RV, Nagle RB, Nielsen ML, Sargent DJ, Taylor CR, Welton M, Willett C. Prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009;124:979–94.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kim JY, Kim NK, Lee KY, Hur H, Min BS, Kim JH. A comparative study of voiding and sexual function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus robotic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(8):2485–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SurgeryKorea University Anam HospitalSeoulRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations