Abstract
This is a critical review of the main models concerning the System of Orinoco Regional Interdependence. On one hand, early proposals define the system as a heuristic model of interethnic levels of sociocultural integration among autonomous polities. According to this view, this network of cultures belonged to a cultural matrix based on political horizontality and ecological complementarity. This stable system was transformed and eventually destroyed by the impact of the West. On the other hand, critical examinations of recent data questions this model, emphasizing the diverse and complex nature of Amerindian political organizations and the diversity of regional and subregional systems of economic and sociopolitical relations. Here, I examine the development of the system as a long-term process that affected regional polities and local systems in diverse ways through time. Late developments of macrosystems may be seen as rather mestizo artifacts of the expansion of the European world system. In conclusion, simple dichotomies and typologies (egalitarian/complex, nature/culture, Amerindian/European, pristine/colonial) do not work well to explain economic, social, and political institutions that cover diverse environments, societies, and processes of historical change over several millennia.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
Kipp and Schortman (1989, p. 370) established that when exchange goods could be found at the market rather than through exchange between elites the chiefdoms’ power relied increasingly on economic and political exploitation.
- 3.
According to Amodio (1997, p. 57), these systems were as follows: (1) Carib-Arawak, which included Venezuela’s eastern coast and Caribbean islands; (2) Middle-Orinoquian, connecting the coast islands system with Amazonian and Guyana’s savannas systems; (3) Amazonian, integrated by the Upper Orinoco regions; (4) Guyana, which included groups from Gran Sabana, and basins of Branco and Essequibo rivers; and (5) Andean, integrated by groups from the piedmont and Lake Maracaibo’s southern shore.
- 4.
The world-system theory posits that systems should be seen as processes instead of structures and that their constitutive units can be conceived as formed and reformed by relations between them; it is characterized, furthermore, by its eminently geographic approach, the use of multiple levels of analysis, and its evolutive and multilineal vision (Peregrine 1996, pp. 5–6).
- 5.
With minimal internal differentiation of authority, any delegation in a chiefdom approaches total delegation, a situation ripe with potential for usurpation (Wright 1977, p. 381). Optimally, a chief should avoid delegating authority, which means that he has to manage his domain from the center (Spencer 1987, p. 375). This, in turn, implies that there is a spatial limit to the territory that a regional chief can effectively rule: I have suggested that in a preindustrial context, the optimal territory size for a single paramount chief’s domain would be one with a radius no larger than about one-half day of travel from the regional center (Spencer 1982, pp. 6–7, 1987, p. 375). As a rough estimate, for a territory of circular shape, and a walking speed of 5.6 km (3.5 miles) per hour over a 10-hour day, this would be a maximal domain with a diameter of 56 km (35 miles) and an area of 2,463 km2 (962 square miles) (Spencer 1990, pp. 6–7).
- 6.
For example, polished stone artifacts such as beads and pendants made of serpentinite, malachite, amphibolite, phyllite, and jasper have been found in several high-rank archaeological contexts at the primary regional center (site B12) and in one of the regional centers (B21) in the Gaván Region, in Barinas State. The sources of these minerals should be located outside the Llanos, in areas like the Venezuelan Andes, Maracaibo Lake Basin, and farther regions like south of Colombia, north of Ecuador, and the Caribbean (Spencer and Redmond 1992, pp. 153–154). At the primary regional center of El Cedral region, in the same area, a green stone pendant was found resembling a small amphibian or reptile (Gassón 2000, p. 587). Boomert (1987, p. 33, 37) identified these objects as one of the main prestige goods in circulation among groups from the tropical forest and the northeastern coast of South America because of their ritual meaning and symbolic associations, proposing their circulation in exchange systems like the kula rings in Melanesia in areas where the quirípa was circulating (cf. Malinowski 1975, pp. 95–96; Gassón 1999, p. 81).
- 7.
The specific economic characteristics of a prestige-good system are dominated by the political advantage gained through exercising control over access to resources that can only be obtained through external trade. However, these are not the resources required for general material well-being or for the manufacture of tools and other utilitarian items. Instead emphasis is placed on controlling the acquisition of wealth objects needed in social transactions and the payment of social debts. Groups are linked to each other through the competitive exchange of wealth objects as gifts and feasting in continuous cycles of status rivalry (Frankenstein and Rowlands 1978, p. 76).
- 8.
According to Binford (1972, p. 204), an interaction sphere is defined as the “regular and cultural means to maintain and institutionalize the inter-social interaction.”
- 9.
According to Renfrew (1986, p. 1), the interaction between equivalent political units designates the complete scope of exchanges (including imitation and emulation, competition, war, and exchange of material goods and information), which is performed among autonomous political units (self-governed and politically independent), neighboring or close to each other in the same geographical area, or in some cases, in bigger areas.
- 10.
“Gateway communities develop either as a response to increased trade or to the settling of sparsely populated areas. They generally are located along natural corridors of communication and at the critical passages between areas of high mineral, agricultural, or craft productivity; dense population; high demand or supply for scarce resources; and, at the interface of different technologies or levels of sociopolitical complexity…The function of these settlements is to satisfy demand for commodities through trade and the location of these communities reduces transportation cost involved in their movement” (Hirth 1978, p. 37).
References
Acosta Saignes, M. (1946). Los Caribe de la Costa Venezolana. Cuadernos Americanos, I, 173–184.
Amodio, E. (1991). Relaciones Interétnicas en el Caribe Indígena. Una reconstrucción a partir de los primeros testimonios europeos. Revista de Indias, 51(193), 571–606.
Amodio, E. (1997). La artesanía indígena en Venezuela. Caracas: Consejo Nacional de la Cultura.
Anderson, D. (1994). The Savanna river chiefdoms. Political change in the Late Prehistoric Southeast. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
Arellano, A. (1982). Orígenes de la economía Venezolana. Caracas: Universidad Central de Venezuela [1946].
Arvelo-Jiménez, N., & Biord, H. (1994). The impact of the conquest on contemporary indigenous peoples of the Guiana Shield: The System of Orinoco Regional Interdependence. In A. Roosevelt (Ed.), Amazonian Indians. From prehistory to the present (pp. 55–78). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
Arvelo-Jiménez, N., Morales, F., & Biord, H. (1989). Repensando la Historia del Orinoco. Revista de Antropología, 5(1–2), 155–174.
Binford, L. (1972). An archaeological perspective. New York: Seminar.
Biord, H. (1985). El contexto multilingüe del Sistema de Interdependencia Regional del Orinoco. Antropológica, 63–64, 83–101.
Biord, H., Amodio, E., & Morales, F. (1989). Historia de los Kari’as. Período Colonial. Caracas: IVIC–CLAL.
Boomert, A. (1987). Gifts of the Amazons: “Green stone” pendants and beads as items of ceremonial exchange in Amazonia and the Caribbean. Antropológica, 67, 33–54.
Boomert, A. (2000). Trinidad, Tobago and the lower Orinoco interaction sphere. An archaeological/ethnohistorical study. Alkmaar: Cairi Publications.
Champion, T., & Champion, S. (1986). Peer polity interaction in the European Iron Age. In C. Renfrew, & J. Cherry (Eds.), Peer polity interaction and socio-political change (pp. 59–68). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Frankenstein, S., & Rowlands, M. (1978). The internal structure and regional context of Early Iron Age society in south-western Germany. Institute of Archaeology Bulletin, 15, 73–112.
Gassón, R. (1996). La evolución del intercambio a larga distancia en el nororiente de Suramérica: bienes de intercambio y poder político en una perspectiva diacrónica. In C. Langebaek, & F. Cárdenas (Eds.), Caciques, intercambio y poder: interacción regional en el Área Intermedia de las Américas (pp. 133–154). Bogotá: Universidad de los Andes.
Gassón, R. (1998). Pre-Hispanic intensive agriculture, settlement pattern and political economy in the western Venezuelan Llanos. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh.
Gassón, R. (2000). Quiripas and Mostacillas: the evolution of shell beads as a medium of exchange in northern South America. Ethnohistory, 47(3), 581–609.
Gassón, R. (2001). Tipos y grados: organizaciones políticas prehispánicas del occidente de Venezuela. In L. Meneses, & G. Gordones (Eds.), La arqueología venezolana en el nuevo milenio (pp. 179–209). Mérida: Universidad de los Andes.
Gnecco, C. (1996). Relaciones de intercambio y bienes de elite entre los cacicazgos del suroccidente de Colombia. In C. Langebaek, & F. Cárdenas (Eds.), Caciques, intercambio y poder: interacción regional en el Área Intermedia de las Américas (pp. 175–196). Bogotá: Universidad de los Andes.
González, M. (1986). Ocupación y uso de la tierra y relaciones interétnicas: los Guajibo de los Llanos del Meta (Siglos XVI al XVIII). Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Departamento de Antropología, Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas, Caracas.
Heinen, H. D. (1992). The early colonization of the lower Orinoco and its impact on present day indigenous peoples. Antropológica, 78, 51–85.
Heinen, H. D., & García-Castro, A. (2000). The multiethnic network of the lower Orinoco in early Colonial times. Ethnohistory, 47(3–4), 561–579.
Hirth, K. (1978). Interregional trade and the formation of prehistoric gateway communities. American Antiquity, 43(1), 35–45.
Kipp, R., & Schortmann, E. (1989). The political impact of trade in chiefdoms. American Anthropologist, 91, 370–385.
Langebaek, C. (1991). Highland center and foothill periphery in 16th-century of eastern Colombia. Research in Economic Anthropology, 13, 325–339.
Langebaek, C. (1992). Noticias de caciques muy mayores. Origen y desarrollo de las sociedades complejas en el nororiente de Colombia y norte de Venezuela. Bogotá: Universidad de los Andes.
Langebaek, C. (1995). Arqueología regional en el territorio Muisca. Estudio de los valles de Fúquene y Susa. University of Pittsburgh Memoirs in Latin American Archaeology No. 9, Pittsburgh.
Malinowsky, B. (1975). Los argonautas del Pacífico Occidental. Barcelona: Ediciones Península.
Morales, F. (1979). Reconstrucción etnohistórica de los Kari’ña de los siglos XVI y XVII. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Departamento de Antropología, Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas, Caracas.
Morales, F. (1990). Los hombres del onoto y la macana. Caracas: Editorial Tropykos.
Morales, F., & Arvelo-Jiménez, N. (1981). Hacia un modelo de estructura social Caribe. América Indígena, 41, 602–626.
Morey, N. (1975). Etnohistory of the Colombian and Venezuelan Llanos. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Utah, Provo.
Morey, N. (1976). Ethnohistorical evidence for cultural complexity in the western Llanos of Venezuela and the eastern Llanos of Colombia. Antropológica, 45, 41–70.
Morey, R., & Morey, N. (1975). Relaciones comerciales en el pasado en los Llanos de Colombia y Venezuela. Montalbán, 4, 533–564.
Peregrine, P. (1996). Introduction: World-systems theory and archaeology. In P. Peregrine, & G. Feinman (Eds.), Pre-Columbian world systems (pp. 1–10). Madison: Prehistory Press.
Plog, F. (1977). Modelling economic exchange. In T. Earle, & J. Erickson (Eds.), Exchange systems in prehistory (pp. 127–139). New York: Academic Press.
Redmond, E., & Spencer, C. (1990). Investigaciones arqueológicas en el piedemonte y los Llanos Altos de Barinas, Venezuela. Boletín de la Asociación Venezolana de Arqueología, 5, 4–24.
Redmond, E., Gassón, R., & Spencer, C. (1999). A macroregional view of cycling chiefdoms in the western Venezuelan Llanos. In E. Bacus, & L. J. Lucero (Eds.), Complex polities in the ancient tropical world (pp. 109–129). Arlington: Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association Number 9.
Renfrew, C. (1986). Introduction: Peer polity interaction and socio-political change. In C. Renfrew, & J. Cherry (Eds.), Peer polity interaction and socio-political change (pp. 1–18). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rey, J. C. (2003). Aportes al estudio macro-regional de las sociedades prehispánicas de los Llanos Occidentales Venezolanos. Configuración regional del Área de El Cedral. Unpublished undergraduate thesis, Escuela de Antropología, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas.
Salas, J. C. (1971). Tierra Firme (Venezuela y Colombia). Estudios de Etnología e Historia. Mérida: Universidad de los Andes [1908].
Sanoja, M., & Vargas, I. (1999). De tribus a señoríos: los Andes Septentrionales. In L. G. Lumbreras (Ed.), Historia de la América Andina. Volumen 1: Las sociedades aborígenes (pp. 199–220). Quito: Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar.
Sanoja, M., Bencomo, C., & Aguila, T. (1994). Proyecto Arqueológico Guayana. Primer Informe Anual. Guayana City: División de Cuencas e Hidrología, CVG Electrificación del Caroní (EDELCA).
Spencer, C. (1990). On the tempo and mode of State formation: Neoevolutionism reconsidered. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 9, 1–30.
Spencer, C. (1991). The coevolution and the development of Venezuelan chiefdoms. In T. Rambo, & K. Gillogly (Eds.), Profiles in cultural evolution: Papers from a conference in honor of Elman Service (pp. 137–165). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
Spencer, C., & Redmond, E. (1992). Pre-Hispanic chiefdoms of the western Venezuelan Llanos. World Archaeology, 24, 134–157.
Spencer, C., Redmond, E., & Rinaldi, M. (1994). Drained fields at La Tigra, Venezuelan Llanos: A regional perspective. Latin American Antiquity, 5(2), 119–143.
Vidal, S. (1993). Reconstrucción de los procesos de etnogénesis y de reproducción social de los Baré de Río Negro (Siglos XVI-XVIII). Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Departamento de Antropología, Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas, Caracas.
Vidal, S. (1999). Amerindian groups of northwest Amazonia. The regional system of political-religious hierarchies. Anthropos, 94, 515–528.
Vidal, S. (2000). Kúwe Duwákalumi: The Arawak sacred routes of migration, trade, and resistance. Ethnohistory, 47(3–4), 635–667.
Whitehead, N. (1990). The Mazaruni pectoral: a golden artefact discovered in Guyana and the historical sources concerning native metallurgy in the Caribbean, Orinoco and northern Amazonia. Archaeology and Anthropology. Journal of the Walther Roth Museum of Anthropology, 7, 19–38.
Whitehead, N. (1994). The ancient Amerindian polities of the Amazon, the Orinoco, and the Atlantic coast: a preliminary analysis of their passage from antiquity to extinction. In A. Roosevelt (Ed.), Amazonian Indians. From prehistory to the present (pp. 33–54). Tucson, University of Arizona Press.
Whitehead, N. (1998). Colonial chieftains of the lower Orinoco and Guayana coast. In E. Redmond (Ed.), Chiefdoms and chieftaincy in the Americas (pp. 150–163). Gainesville: University Press of Florida.
Zent, S. (n. d.). The historical ecology of interethnic relations in the Middle Orinoco Region. Unpublished manuscript, Departamento de Antropología, Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas, Caracas.
Zucchi, A., & Gassón, R. (2002). Elementos para una interpretación alternativa de los circuitos de intercambio indígena de los Llanos de Venezuela y Colombia durante los siglos XVI-XVIII. Arqueología del Área Intermedia, 4, 65–87.
Acknowledgments
This chapter is a modified version of “Relaciones Políticas y Económicas entre los Andes y los Llanos Orientales de Colombia y Venezuela en el Período Tardío y Epoca de Contacto,” presented at the symposium Caciques, Capitanes y Principales. Formas Políticas Prehispánicas y sus Transformaciones Coloniales, organized by Emanuele Amodio y Luis Molina in the LI Convención Annual de AsoVAC; my gratitude to them for their invitation to participate in this symposium. I am also thankful with Alberta Zucchi, Ana María Gómez, Rona Villalba, and Juan Carlos Rey for their ideas and help on the presentation and correction of this chapter. The original Spanish version of this chapter was translated into English by Johan Rodríguez.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gassón, R. (2014). Blind Men and an Elephant: Exchange Systems and Sociopolitical Organizations in the Orinoco Basin and Neighboring Areas in Pre-Hispanic Times. In: Gnecco, C., Langebaek, C. (eds) Against Typological Tyranny in Archaeology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8724-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8724-1_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-8723-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-8724-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)