Patient Positioning; Incision/Port Placement



Positioning, incision, and port placement are critical to the safety and effectiveness of radical prostatectomy either open or robotic. For both approaches, there are variations in positioning that are acceptable and provider-dependent. A uniform feature of robotic positioning is a steep Trendelenburg position that mandates careful attention to securing and padding the patient. There are important physiological effects of Trendelenburg position that with pneumoperitoneum require both anesthesia and surgeon attention. Open or radical retropubic prostatectomy is performed supine with or without table flexion, and attention to patient padding is also critical. Certain patient factors may impact the safety of positioning including obesity and cardiopulmonary disease. Port placement for robotic surgery varies but there are general guidelines to port placement that minimize clashing of robotic arms and enable access to the membranous urethra. The incision for open surgery is standardized to the lower abdomen to enable access to the extraperitoneal space, though skin incisions may vary.


Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy Port Placement Camera Port Ulnar Neuropathy Posterior Rectus Sheath 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy


Radical retropubic prostatectomy


  1. 1.
    Awad H, Santilli S, Ohr M, et al. The effects of steep trendelenburg positioning on intraocular pressure during robotic radical prostatectomy. Anesth Analg. 2009;109(2):473–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cestari A, Buffi NM, Scapaticci E, et al. Simplifying patient positioning and port placement during robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2010;57:530–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chrijvers D, Mottri A, Traen K, et al. Pulmonary gas exchange is well preserved during robot assisted surgery in steep Trendelenberg position. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2009;60(4):229–33.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gainsburg DM. Anesthetic concerns for robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Minerva Anestesiol. 2012;78(5):596–604.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Keene R, Froelich JM, Milbrandt JC, et al. Bilateral gluteal compartment syndrome following robotic-assisted prostatectomy. Orthopedics. 2010;33(11):852.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lestar M, Gunnarsson L, Lagerstrand L, et al. Hemodynamic perturbations during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in 45 degree Trendelenburg position. Anesth Analg. 2011;113:1069–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pick DL, Lee DI, Skarecky DW, et al. Anatomic guide for port placement for da Vinci robotic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2004;18:572–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rosevear HM, Lightfoot AJ, Zahs M, et al. Lessons learned from a case of calf compartment syndrome after robot-assisted laparoscopioc prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2010;24(10):1597–601.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Roth JV. Bilateral sciatic and femoral neuropathies, rhabdomyolysis, and acute renal failure caused by positioning during radical retropubic prostatectomy. Anesth Analg. 2007;105:1747–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Weber ED, Colyer MH, Lesser RI, et al. Posterior ischemic optic neuropathy after minimally invasive prostatectomy. J Neuroophthalmol. 2007;27:285–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kim W, Abdelshehid C, Lee HJ et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in umbilical hernia patients: University of California, Irvine, technique for port placement and repair. Urology 2012;79:1412.e1–1412.e3.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mattei A, DiPierro GB, Rafeld V, et al. Positioning injury, rhabdomyolysis and serum creatinine kinase-concentration course in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection. J Endourol 2013;27(1):45–51.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Section of UrologyDartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterLebanonUSA
  2. 2.Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Medical InstitutionBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations