Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Robot Interaction Control in Medicine and Surgery: Original Results and Open Problems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Computational Surgery and Dual Training

Abstract

In robot-assisted medical procedures, the control of interactions between tools and tissues has recently raised much interest. In this chapter, we give an original perspective to this subject. In Sect. 11.1, we discuss the pros and cons of force feedback for medical applications. We also highlight some original works and point out open problems that would deserve more interest. Then, in Sects. 11.2 and 11.3, we focus on two of our recent contributions to the field of force feedback teleoperation for medical procedures: the automatic detection of haptic events and the compensation of physiological motions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Barbé L, Bayle B, Piccin O, Gangloff J, de Mathelin M (2007) Design and evaluation of a linear haptic device. In: IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation, Roma, Italy, 10–14 April 2007

    Google Scholar 

  2. Basseville M, Nikiforov I (1993) Detection of Abrupt Changes: Theory and Application. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bebek O, Cavusoglu MC (2006) Predictive control algorithms using biological signals for active relative motion canceling in robotic assisted heart surgery. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp 237–244, Orlando, Florida, 15–19 May 2006

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cagneau B, Zemiti N, Bellot D, Morel G (2007) Physiological motion compensation in robotized surgery using force feedback control. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp 1881–1886, Roma, Italy, 10–14 April 2007

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cortesao R, Poignet P (2009) Motion compensation for robotic-assisted surgery with force feedback. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp 3464–3469, Kobe, Japan, 12–17 May 2009

    Google Scholar 

  6. Davies B, Jakopec M, Harris SJ, Rodriguez y Baena F, Barrett A, Evangelidis A, Gomes P, Henckel J, Cobb J (2006) Active-constraint robotics for surgery. Proc IEEE 94(9):1696–1704

    Google Scholar 

  7. De Vlugt E (2004) Identification of Spinal Reflexes. PhD thesis, Technical University of Delft, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dombre E, Duchemin G, Poignet P, Pierrot F (2003) Dermarob: A safe robot for reconstructive surgery. IEEE Trans Robot Autom 19(5):876–884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dominici M, Poignet P, Dombre E (2008) Compensation of physiological motion using linear predictive force control. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp 1173–1178, Nice, France, 22–26 September 2008

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gerovich O, Marayong P, Okamura AM (2004) The effect of visual and haptic feedback on computer-assisted needle insertion. Comput Aided Surg 9(6):243–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ginhoux R, Gangloff J, de Mathelin M, Soler L, Sanchez MMA, Marescaux J (2005) Active filtering of physiological motion in robotized surgery using predictive control. IEEE Trans Robot 21(1):67–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gustafsson F (2000) Adaptive filtering and change detection. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Joinié-Maurin M, Bayle B, Barbe L, Gangloff J (2009) Force feedback teleoperation with physiological motion compensation. In: 9th International IFAC Symposium on Robot Control, Gifu, Japan, 9–12 September 2009

    Google Scholar 

  14. Joinié-Maurin M, Barbé L, Piccin O, Gangloff J, Bayle B (2010) Design of a linear haptic display based on approximate straight line mechanisms. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp 5048–5053, Taipei, (Taïwan), 18–22 October 2010

    Google Scholar 

  15. Joinié-Maurin M, Bayle B, Gangloff J (2011) Force feedback teleoperation with a periodical disturbance compensation. In: Proc. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA 2011, Shanghai, China, 9–13 May 2011

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kazanzides P, Zuhars J, Mittelstadt B, Taylor RH (1992) Force sensing and control for a surgical robot. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp 612–617, Nice, France, May 1992

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kuchenbecker KJ, Fiene J, Niemeyer G (2006) Improving contact realism through event-based haptic feedback. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 12(2):117–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lebosse C, Renaud P, Bayle B, Mathelin M (2011) Modeling and evaluation of low-cost force sensors. IEEE Trans Robot 27(4):815–822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nakamura Y, Kishi K, Kawakami H (2011) Heartbeat synchronization for robotic cardiac surgery. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp 2014–2019, Seoul, Korea, 21–26 May 2001

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ott L, Zanne P, Nageotte F, de Mathelin M, Gangloff J (2008) Physiological motion rejection in flexible endoscopy using visual servoing. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 2928–2933, Pasadena, California, 19–23 May 2008

    Google Scholar 

  21. Page ES (1954) Continous inspection schemes. Biometrika 41:100–115

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Richa R, Bó APL, Poignet P (2010) Beating heart motion prediction for robust visual tracking. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA 2010, pp 4579–4584. IEEE, Anchorage, Alaska, 3–7 May 2010

    Google Scholar 

  23. SCAIME (2013) Miniature Force Transducer K-1107. http://www.scaime.com/index_en.html

  24. Schweikard A, Glosser G, Bodduluri M, Murphy MJ, Adler JR (2000) Robotic motion compensation for respiratory movement during radiosurgery. Comput Aided Surg 5:263–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tholey G, Desai J, Castellanos A (2005) Force feedback plays a significant role in minimally invasive surgery: results and analysis. Ann Surg 241(1):102–109

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wagner C, Stylopoulos N, Howe R (2002) Force feedback in surgery: analysis of blunt dissection. In: Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, pp 1316–1321, Orlando, Florida, 24–25 March 2002

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wong KH, Dieterich S, Tang J, Cleary K (2007) Quantitative measurement of cyberknife robotic arm steering. Tech Canc Res Treat 6(6):589–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yuen SG, Novotny PM, Howe RD (2008) Quasiperiodic predictive filtering for robot-assisted beating heart surgery. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp 3875–3880, Pasadena, California, 19–23 May 2008

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zivanovic A, Davies B (2000) A robotic system for blood sampling. IEEE Trans Inform Tech Biomed 4(1):8–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the IRCAD/EITS staff for their help during in vivo experiments. This work has been supported by the Alsace Regional Council and the French National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Strasbourg, iCube Lab-CNRS, Strasbourg, France

    B. Bayle, M. Joinié-Maurin, L. Barbé, J. Gangloff & M. de Mathelin

Authors
  1. B. Bayle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Joinié-Maurin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. L. Barbé
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J. Gangloff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. M. de Mathelin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Bayle .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Dept of Computer Science, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA

    Marc Garbey

  2. Dept. Surgery, The Methodist Hospital Research Institut, Houston, Texas, USA

    Barbara Lee Bass

  3. Department of Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA

    Scott Berceli

  4. Labo. Sciences de l'Images, de l'Informatique et de la Télédétection, Université Strasbourg I ENSPS, Illkirch, France

    Christophe Collet

  5. Biomedical Engineering Department, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy

    Pietro Cerveri

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bayle, B., Joinié-Maurin, M., Barbé, L., Gangloff, J., de Mathelin, M. (2014). Robot Interaction Control in Medicine and Surgery: Original Results and Open Problems. In: Garbey, M., Bass, B., Berceli, S., Collet, C., Cerveri, P. (eds) Computational Surgery and Dual Training. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8648-0_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8648-0_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-8647-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-8648-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation