Skip to main content

Reflective Practices in Supervision: Why Thinking and Reflecting Are as Important as Doing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Contemporary Social Work Practice ((Contemp. Social Work Practice))

Abstract

The professionals who work in the child welfare system make critical decisions that have long-term impacts on the lives of children and families, and these case-level determinations must be made with careful consideration. Given the high stakes nature of child welfare work, there is tremendous pressure to “do” something at all times. There is a demand for child welfare workers and supervisors to act but less focus on the actual thinking about cases. Case decisions must be grounded in information secured from multiple sources of data. This task is notably difficult, time consuming, and complex due to high levels of uncertainty. Decisions at all critical junctures in the child welfare system are made with incomplete, insufficient and, at times, contradictory information. In the face of uncertainty, practices that assist workers in improving their decision making are both desirable and appreciated.

The process of reflective supervision and other reflective practices holds promise for addressing the needs of caseworkers and promoting child- and family-centered practice. These practices help workers manage the stressful nature of the work by providing a space to reflect on their own thoughts and feelings. Supervision that is less focused on compliance with discrete, concrete tasks and more on thoughtful decision-making provides an opportunity to move child welfare work beyond the narrow focus on investigation of abuse to a holistic assessment of child and family needs. It also increases the potential for keeping committed, compassionate, and well-educated workers in the field of child protection as abuse and neglect are complex issues and difficult to address. Moving child welfare to a point where thinking, problem-solving, and exploring emotions is part of standard practice has the potential to improve decisions that are made when working with children and families. The evidence for reflective practice, while still emerging in social work, has shown early positive outcomes in Early Head Start programs serving families and young children in the community. Continued research into how to implement reflective practices and ongoing examination of the results at the child, family, and organizational level is called for so that we can improve the lives of children, families, and the individuals who are charged with their safety.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • American Public Human Services Association. (2005). Report from the 2004 child welfare workforce survey: State Agency Findings. Washington, DC: APHSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnott, D. (2006). Cognitive biases and decision support systems development: A design science approach. Information Systems Journal, 16(1), 55–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashraf, H., & Rarieya, J. F. (2008). Teacher development through reflective conversations—possibilities and tensions: A Pakistan case. Reflective Practice, 9(3), 269–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cahalane, H., & Sites, E. W. (2008). The climate of child welfare employee retention. Child Welfare, 87(1), 91–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Child Welfare Education and Research Programs. (2009). 2008–2009 Annual Report, School of Social Work, University of Pittsburgh. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleaver, H., & Freeman, P. (1995). Parental perspectives in cases of suspected child abuse. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P. M. (1994). Does mentorship among social workers make a difference? An empirical investigation of career outcomes. Social Work, 39(4), 413–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins-Camargo, C., & Groeber, C. (2003). Adventures in partnership: Using learning laboratories to enhance frontline supervision in child welfare. Professional Development: The International Journal of Continuing Social Work Education, 6(1), 17–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, P., Shaver, C., Bennett, P., & Aldrich, A. (2003). I can’t get no satisfaction: Exploring the relationship between supervision, job satisfaction and turnover in two rural child protection agencies. Paper presented at the Annual Program Meeting of the Council on Social Work Education, Atlanta, GA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croskerry, P. (2003). Cognitive forcing strategies in clinical decision-making. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 41(1), 110–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health. (2003). The Victoria Climbie Inquiry: Report of an Inquiry. London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickenson, N., & Perry, R. (2002). Factors influencing the retention of specially educated public child welfare workers. Journal of Health and Social Policy, 15(3/4), 89–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellett, A. J., Ellett, C. D., Ellis, J., Westbrook, T., & Dews, D. (2004). A state-wide qualitative study of 385 professionals: Toward a greater understanding of employee retention and turnover in child welfare. Paper presented at the Society for Social Work Research, New Orleans, LA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenichel, E. (1992). Learning through supervision and mentorship to support the development of infants, toddlers and their families: A sourcebook. Washington DC: Zero to Three.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, J. A. (2001). Maintaining front-line workers in child protection: A case for refocusing supervision. Child Abuse Review, 10, 323–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilkerson, L. (2004). Irving B. Harris Distinguished Lecture: Reflective supervision in infant-family programs: Adding clinical process to nonclinical settings. Infant Mental Health, 25(5), 424–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J., & Gallop, L. (2003). No time to think: Protecting the reflective space in children’s services. Child Abuse Review, 12, 101–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J., Treseder, J., & Glennie, S. (2002). An exploration of participation within an Action Research Project designed to improve service delivery to a small group of families with complex needs in an English new town. Paper presented at the Conference on Action Research Constructivism and Democracy, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadushin, A. (1992). Supervision in Social Work (3rd ed.). New York: University of Columbia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAllister, C., & Thomas, T. (2007). Infant mental health and family support: Contributions of Early Head Start to an integrated model for community-based early childhood programs. Infant Mental Health Journal, 28(2), 192–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, M. (2003). Workforce retention research in New York State. Paper presented at the meeting of the Council on Social Work Education, Atlanta GA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osmond, J. (2001). The practice of knowledge use: A study of explicit and tacit understandings of Practitioners. Ph.D. Thesis. The University of Queensland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osmond, J., & Darlington, Y. (2005). Reflective analysis: Techniques for facilitating reflection. Australian Social Work, 58(1), 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, A., Nelson, C., Shelton, S. R., Dausey, D. J., Lewis, M. W., Pomeroy, A., & Leuschner, K. J. (2009). Measuring crisis decision making for public health emergencies. Prepared for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response. RAND WR-577-DHHS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, J., Cowley, P., & Tomlinson, P. (2000). Overcoming barriers to effective child care practice. Child and Family Social Work, 5, 343–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rauktis, M. E., & Koeske, G. (1994). Maintaining social worker morale: When supportive supervision is not enough. Administration in Social Work, 18(1), 39–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rycraft, J. R. (1994). The party isn’t over: The agency role in the retention of public child welfare caseworkers. Social Work, 39(1), 75–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruch, G. (2002). From triangle to spiral: Reflective practice in social work education, practice and research. Social Work Education, 21(2), 199–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruch, G. (2005). Reflective practice in contemporary child-care social work: The role of containment. British Journal of Social Work, 37, 659–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruch, G. (2007a). Case discussion in child care social work. Child and Family Social Work, 12, 370–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruch, G. (2007b). ‘Thoughtful’ practice: Child care social work and the role of case discussion. Child and Family Social Work, 12, 370–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, E. M., & Weiss, S. (2001). Doing reflective supervision with student teachers in a professional development school culture. Reflective Practice, 2(2), 125–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westbrook, T. M., Ellis, J., & Ellett, A. J. (2006). Improving retention among public child welfare workers: What can we learn from the insights and experiences of committed survivors? Administration in Social Work, 30(4), 37–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Special thanks to the caseworkers who participated in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mary Elizabeth Rauktis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rauktis, M.E., Thomas, T.L. (2013). Reflective Practices in Supervision: Why Thinking and Reflecting Are as Important as Doing. In: Cahalane, H. (eds) Contemporary Issues in Child Welfare Practice. Contemporary Social Work Practice. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8627-5_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics