Categorical Dependent Variables

  • Hubert Gatignon


In this chapter, we consider statistical models to analyze variables where the numbering does not have any meaning and, in particular, where there is no relationship between one level of the variable and another level. In these cases, we are typically trying to establish whether it is possible to explain with other variables the level observed of the criterion variable. The chapter is divided into two parts. The first part presents discriminant analysis, which is a traditional method in multivariate statistical analysis. The second part introduces quantal choice statistical models. The models are described, as well as their estimation. Their measures of fit are also discussed.


Discriminant Analysis Discriminant Function Marginal Utility Multinomial Logit Model Conditional Logit Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Basic Technical Readings

  1. Maddala, G. S. (1983). Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics [Chap. 3 and Chap. 4]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. McFadden, D. (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In P. Zarembka (Ed.), Frontiers in econometrics. New York, NY: Academic.Google Scholar
  3. McFadden, D. (1980). Econometric models of probabilistic choice among products. Journal of Business, 53(3), S13–S29.Google Scholar
  4. Morrison, D. G. (1969). On the interpretation of discriminant analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 6(2), 156–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Press, S. J., & Sandra, W. (1978). Choosing between logistic regression and discriminant analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 73(364), 699–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Schmidt, P., & Strauss, R. P. (1975). The prediction of occupation using multiple logit models. International Economic Review, 16(2), 471–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Application Readings

  1. Adapa, S. (2008). Discriminant analysis of adopters and non-adopters of global brands: Empirical evidence from India and Malaysia. The ICFAI University Journal of Brand Management, 5(4), 7–25.Google Scholar
  2. Aviv, S., & Ruvio, A. (2008). Opinion leaders and followers: A replication and extension. Psychology and Marketing, 25(3), 280–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bruderl, J., & Schussler, R. (1990). Organizational mortality: The liabilities of newness and adolescence. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(3), 530–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Corstjens, M. L., & Gautschi, D. A. (1983). Formal choice models in marketing. Marketing Science, 2(1), 19–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Deshpandé, R., Farley, J. U., & Webster, F. E. J. (1993, January). Corporate culture, customer orientation, and innovativeness in Japanese firms: A quadrad analysis. Journal of Marketing, 57, 23–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Duffy, R. S. (2008). Towards a better understanding of partnership attributes: An exploratory analysis of relationship type classification. Industrial Marketing Management, 37(2), 228–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fader, P. S., & Lattin, J. M. (1993). Accounting for heterogeneity and nonstationarity in a cross-sectional model of consumer purchase behavior. Marketing Science, 12(3), 304–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fader, P. S., Lattin, J. M., & Little, J. D. C. (1992). Estimating nonlinear parameters in the multinomial logit model. Marketing Science, 11(4), 372–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Foekens, E. W., Leeflang, P. S. H., & Wittink, D. (1997). Hierarchical versus other market share models for markets with many items. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 14, 359–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fotheringham, A. S. (1988). Consumer store choice and choice set definition. Marketing Science, 7(3), 299–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gatignon, H., & Anderson, E. (1988). The multinational corporation’s degree of control over foreign subsidiaries: An empirical test of a transaction cost explanation. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 4(2), 89–120.Google Scholar
  12. Gatignon, H., & Reibstein, D. J. (1986). Pooling logit models. Journal of Marketing Research, 23(3), 281–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guadagni, P. M., & Little, J. D. C. (1983). A logit model brand choice calibrated on scanner data. Marketing Science, 2(3), 203–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gupta, S. (1988). Impact of sales promotions on when, what, and how much to buy. Journal of Marketing Research, 25(4), 342–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gupta, S., Chintagunta, P. K., & Wittink, D. R. (1997). Household heterogeneity and state dependence in a model of purchase strings: Empirical results and managerial implications. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 14, 341–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hall, E. H., Jr., & St. John, C. H. (1994). A methodological note on diversity measurement. Strategic Management Journal, 15(2), 153–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hardie, B. G. S., Johnson, E. J., & Fader, P. S. (1992). Modeling loss aversion and reference dependence effects on brand choice. Marketing Science, 12(4), 378–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pieper, T. M., Klein, S. B., & Jaskiewicz, P. (2008). The impact of goal alignment on board existence and top management team composition: Evidence from family-influenced businesses. Journal of Small Business Management, 46(3), 372–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Robertson, T. S., & Gatignon, H. (1998). Technology development mode: A transaction cost conceptualization. Strategic Management Journal, 19(6), 515–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sinha, A. (2000). Understanding supermarket competition using choice maps. Marketing Letters, 11(1), 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tallman, S. B. (1991, Summer). Strategic management models and resource-based strategies among MNEs in a host market. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Torben, H. (2005). Consumer adoption of online grocery buying: A discriminant analysis. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 33(2), 101–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Vasudevan, R., Venkatraman, N., & Camillus, J. C. (1986). Multi-objective assessment of effectiveness of strategic planning: A discriminant analysis approach. Academy of Management Journal, 29(2), 347–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wiggins, R. R., & Ruefli, T. W. (1995). Necessary conditions for the predictive validity of strategic groups: Analysis without reliance on clustering techniques. Academy of Management Journal, 38(6), 1635–1656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Yapa, L. S., & Mayfield, R. C. (1978). Non-adoption of innovations: Evidence from discriminant analysis. Economic Geography, 54(2), 145–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hubert Gatignon
    • 1
  1. 1.INSEADFontainebleau CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations