Skip to main content

Presenting Results of Statistical Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Using Statistics in Social Research
  • 9401 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter is intended to be a practical guide to help with the construction of tables and figures and with the general presentation of results of statistical analysis in a research paper. Constructing tables and figures well and writing a results section so that it appears to make a coherent point—and does not wander—is as important as constructing a solid research question and conducting analyses correctly to answer it. That is, if the reporting of the results does a poor job of telling a story that can answer the research question, it is ultimately pointless to have developed a good literature review and research question. For that matter, the statistical analyses may have been performed extremely well, but if the results are not displayed in a way that is easy to see and understand, the analyses have been a waste of time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agin, D. (2006). Junk science: An overdue indictment of government, industry, and faith groups that twist science for their own gain. New York: Thomas Dunne Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babbie, E. (2004). The practice of social research (10th ed.). Belmont: Thomson Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonevac, D. (2003). Deduction: Introductory symbolic logic (2nd ed.). Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunch, B. (1997). Mathematical fallacies and paradoxes. Mineola: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, S. K. (2004). Flaws and fallacies in statistical thinking. Mineoloa: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand-McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland, W. S. (1993). Visualizing data. Summit: Hobart Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, J. A. (2009). Why evolution is true. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. A. (1985). The logic of causal order (Sage University paper series on quantitative applications in the social sciences, series no. 07–55). Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeGroot, M. H., & Schervish, M. J. (2012). Probability and statistics (4th ed.). Boston: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, W. T., & Flynn, J. R. (2006). Black Americans reduce the racial IQ gap: Evidence from standardization samples. Psychological Science, 16(10), 913–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2009). Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (3rd ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duneier, M. (2012). Qualitative methods. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell companion to sociology (1st ed., pp. 73–81). West Sussex: Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1997). The division of labor in society (L. A. Coser, Trans.). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firebaugh, G. (2008). Seven rules for social research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, J. (2008). Applied regression analysis and generlized linear models (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2009). Basic econometrics (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawking, S. (1988). A brief history of time. New York: Bantam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooke, R. (1983). How to tell the liars from the statisticians. New York: Marcel Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huff, D. (1993). How to lie with statistics. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Idler, E. L., & Benyamini, Y. (1997). Self-rated health and mortality: A review of twenty-seven community studies. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 38(1), 21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberson, S. (1987). Making it count: The improvement of social research and theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohr, S. L. (1999). Sampling: Design and analysis. Pacific Grove: Duxbury Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, S. M. (2007). Introduction to applied Bayesian statistics and estimation for social scientists. New York: Springer.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1988). Economic and philosophic manuscripts of 1844 (M. Milligan, Trans.). Amherst: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mlodinow, L. (2008). The Drunkard’s walk: How randomness rules our lives. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, S. L., & Winship, C. (2007). Counterfactuals and causal inference: Methods and principles for social research. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Paulos, J. A. (2001). Innumeracy: Mathematical illiteracy and its consequences. New York: Hill & Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigliucci, M. (2010). Nonsense on stilts: How to tell science from bunk. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. S. (1992). The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, S. H., Heuveline, P., & Guillot, M. (2001). Demography: Meauring and modeling population processes. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheaffer, R. L., Mendenhall, W., III, Ott, R. L., & Gerow, K. (2012). Elementary survey sampling (7th ed.). Boston: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. W., Marsden, P., Hout, M., & Kim, J. (2011). General social surveys 1972–2010 [machine-readable data file]/Principal Investigator, T.W. Smith; Co-Principal Investigator, P.V. Marsden; Co-Principal Investigator, M. Hout; Sponsored by National Science Foundation.–NORC ed.–Chicago: National Opinion Research Center [producer]; Storrs, CT: The Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut [distributer].

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel, P. T. (2005). Mean, median, and skew: Correcting a textbook rule. Journal of Statistics Education, 13(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Western, B. (2009). Punishment and inequality in America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, A. (2013). Waves of war: Nationalism, state formation, and ethnic exclusion in the modern world. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziliak, S. T., & McCloskey, D. N. (2008). The cult of statistical significance: How the standard error costs us jobs, justice, and lives. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lynch, S.M. (2013). Presenting Results of Statistical Analysis. In: Using Statistics in Social Research. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8573-5_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics