Properties of the Host (The Human Body)

  • George R. Baran
  • Mohammad F. Kiani
  • Solomon Praveen Samuel
Chapter

Abstract

It will be much easier to follow the discussion in later chapters on the subjects of implants and other biomedical technologies if an appreciation of certain anatomic and physiologic characteristics of the human body has been obtained. In this chapter, we will describe and discuss the building blocks of the human body, and certain diseases such as arthritis which affect the structure and performance of the body. You should be better able to understand why implants are designed in certain ways so that they can be used to rehabilitate normal function.

Keywords

Nickel Arthritis Torque Estrogen Osteoarthritis 

References

  1. 1.
    Cerruti, M., & Sahai, N. (2006). Silicate biomaterials for orthopedic and dental implants. Reviews in Minerology and Geochemistry, 64, 283–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anderson, J. (2001). Biological responses to materials. Annual Reviews in Materials Research, 31, 81–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anderson, J., Rodriguez, A., & Chang, D. (2008). Foreign body reaction to biomaterials. Seminars in Immunology, 20, 86–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kirsner, R., & Eaglstein, W. (1993). The wound healing process. Dermatologic Clinics of North America, 11, 629–640.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Currey, J. (1999). The design of mineralised hard tissue for their mechanical function. Journal of Experimental Biology, 202, 3285–3294.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Currey, J. (2002). Bones. Structure and mechanics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Seeman, E. (2003). The structural and biomechanical basis of the gain and loss of bone strength in women and men. Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America, 32, 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Park, J., & Lakes, R. (2007). Biomaterials. An introduction (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Galkowski, V., Petrisor, B., Drew, B., & Dick, D. (2009). Bone stimulation for fracture healing: What’s all the fuss? Indian Journal of Orthopedics, 43, 117–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Frost, H. (2001). From Wolff’s law to the Utah paradigm: Insights about bone physiology and its clinical applications. Anatomical Record, 262, 398–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Melton, L., 3rd. (2000). Who has osteoporosis? A conflict between clinical and public health perspectives. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 15, 2309–2314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Oxlund, H., Mosekilde, L., & Ortoft, G. (1996). Reduced concentration of collagen reducible cross links in human trabecular bone with respect to age and osteoporosis. Bone, 19, 479–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Heaney, R. (2003). Is the paradigm shifting? Bone, 33, 457–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gage, B.F., Birman-Deych, E., Radford, M.J., Nilasena, D.S. & Binder, E.F. et al. (2006). Risk of osteoporotic fracture in elderly patients taking warfarin: Results from the national registry of atrial fibrillation 2. Archives of Internal Medicine, 166, 241–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hubbard, R., Tattersfield, A., Smith, C., West, J., Smeeth, L. & Fletcher, A. et al. (2002). Inhaled corticosteroids and hip fracture: A population based case-control study. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 166, 1563–1566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zioupos, P., Currey, J., & Hamer, A. (1999). The role of collagen in the declining mechanical properties of aging human cortical bone. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 45, 108–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chevalley, T., Hoffmayer, P., Bonjour, J.P. & Rizzoli, R. et al. (2002). An osteoporosis clinical pathway for the medical management of patients with low trauma fracture. Osteoporosis International, 13, 450–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Boot, A.M., de Ridder, M.A.J., Pols, H.A.P., Krenning, E.P. & de Muinck Keizer-Schrama, S.M.P.F. (1997). Bone mineral density in children and adolescents: Relation to puberty, calcium intake, and physical activity. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 82, 57–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Beshgetoor, D., Nichols, J., & Rego, I. (2000). Effect of training mode and calcium intake on bone mineral density in female master cyclists, runners, and non-athletes. Intenational Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism, 13, 290–301.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • George R. Baran
    • 1
  • Mohammad F. Kiani
    • 2
  • Solomon Praveen Samuel
    • 3
  1. 1.College of EngineeringTemple UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringTemple UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA
  3. 3.Orthopedic Surgery Bioengineering LaboratoryAlbert Einstein Medical CenterPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations