Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Government e-Strategic Planning and Management pp 49–63Cite as

Assessing Public Participation Through Different Lens: The Case of Public Participation Geographic Information Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 1586 Accesses

Part of the book series: Public Administration and Information Technology ((PAIT,volume 3))

Abstract

Public participation geographic information systems (PPGIS) pertain to the use of geographic information systems (GIS) to broaden public involvement in policymaking. Despite the importance of this topic, there is a lack of evaluation methods regarding the participation of the public through PPGISs. To fill this gap, the objective of this study is to analyze the level of e-democracy of PPGIS’s websites and identify lessons that will enable PPGIs to develop appropriate strategies for e-democracy implementation and diffusion. To achieve the above-mentioned objectives, we analyze PPGISs websites; we also apply a multiple case study methodology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abelson, J. (2006). Assessing the impacts of public participation: Concepts, evidence, and policy implications, Ottawa. : Canadian Policy Research Networks Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnstein, S. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 35(4), 216–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anttiroiko, A. V. (2007). Democratic e-Governance basic concepts, issue and future trends. Digest of Electronic Government Policy and Regulation, 30, 83–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabiddu F. (2012). Misurazione dell’e-democracy nelle amministrazioni provinciali:un caso esplorativo. Azienda Pubblica, 2 (apr-giu), 159-186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabiddu F. (2009). The use of web services for inclusive decision process: Towards the Enhancement of E-Democracy. In Alessandro D’Atri; Domenico Saccà (Eds.), Information Systems: People, Organizations, Institutions, and Technologies. Heidelberg, Germany: Physica-Verlag, Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver, S. (2003). The future of participatory approaches using geographic information: developing a research agenda for the 21st Century. URISA Journal, 15(1), 61–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Censis – Rur. (2004).E-democracy: un’opportunità per tutti?. Roma: CENSIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curry, M. (1995). Rethinking rights and responsibilities in geographic information systems: Beyond the Power of the Image. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 22(1), 58–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demchak C. C., Friis C., & La Porte T. M. (2000), Webbing governance: national differences in constructing the public face. In G. D. Garson (ed.), Handbook of public information systems. New York: Marcel Dekker Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, C. (2007). Participatory GIS: a people GIS? Progress in Human Geography, 31(5), 616–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floreddu, P., Cabiddu, F., & Pettinao, D. (2011). Public participation in environmental decision-making: the case of PPGIS. In A. D’Atri, M. Ferrara, & J. F. George (Eds.), Information Technology And Innovation Trends In Organizations. Heidelberg, Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganapati, S. (2011). Uses of public participation geographic information systems application in e-Governement. Public Administration Review, 71(3), 425–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gant D. B., & Gant J. P. (2002) Enhancing E-Service Delivery, E-government series, state web portals: delivering and financing e-service. Price waterhouse Coopers Endowment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild, M. F. (2007). Citizens as voluntary sensors: Spatial Data Infrastructure in the World of Web 2.0. International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research, 2, 24–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grönlund, A., (2009). ICT is not participation is not democracy: eParticipation development models revisited. In A. Macintosh, & E. Tambouris (Eds.), Proceedings of 1 st International Conference on Electronic Participation, ePart 2009 (pp. 12–23). Berlin: Springer-LNCS 5694.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grönlund, A. (2002). Electronic Government: design, Application and Management. London, UK: Idea Group Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jankowsky, P. (2009). Toward participatory geographic information system for community based environmental decision making. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(6), 1966–1971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, G. (2002). GIS for community forestry user groups in Nepal: putting people before the technology. In W. Craig, T. Harris, & D. Weiner (Eds.), Community participation and geographic information systems (pp. 232–245). London, UK: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingston, R. (2007). Public participation in local policy decision-making: the role of web-based mapping. Cartographic Journal, 44(2), 138–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, H. S., & Prosperi, D. C. (2005). Citizen participation and internet GIS: Some recent advances. Computers Environment and Urban System, 9(6), 617–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holden, S. H. (2003). The evolution of information technology management at the federal level: implications for public administration. In G. D. Garson (Ed.), Public Information Technology Policy and Management Issues (pp. 53–73). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laituri, M. (2003). The Issue of Access: An Assessment, Guide for Evaluating Public Participation Geographic Information Science Case Studies. URISA Journal, 15(2), 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macintosh, A., & Whyte, A. (2008). Towards an evaluation framework for eParticipation. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 2(1), 16–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macintosh, A. (2004). Characterizing E-Participation in Policy-Making. Proceedings of the 37° Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, January 5–8, 2004, Big Island, Hawaii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative Data Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyerges, T., Ramsey, K., & Wilson, M. (2006). Design Considerations for an Internet Portal to Support Public Participation in Transportation Improvement Decision Making. In S. Balram & S. Dragićević (Eds.), Collaborative Geographic Information Systems (pp. 208–236). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2001). Citizens as Partners: Information, consultation and public participation in policy-making. Paris.: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obermeyer, N. (1998). PPGIS: The Evolution of Public Participation GIS. Cartography and GIS, 25, 65–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, Z. R. (2001). Internet GIS for public participation. Environmental and Planning B., 28, 889–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pina, V., Torres, L., & Royo, S. (2007). Are ICT’s improving transparency and accountability in the EU regional and local development. Public Administration, 85(2), 449-472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2000). Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation. Science, Technology and Human Values, 25(1), 3–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, G., Marsh, R., & Frewer, L. J. (2004). Evaluation of a deliberative conference. Science, Technology and Human Values, 29(1), 88–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sæbø, Ø., Rose, J., & Skiftenes Flak, L. (2008). The shape of eParticipation: characterizing an emerging research area. Government Information Quarterly, 25(3), 400–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sieber, R. (2006). Public participation geographic information systems: a literature review and framework. Annals of Association of American Geographers, 96(3), 491–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlossberg, M., & Shuford, E. (2003). Delineating “Public” and “Participation” in PPGIS. URISA Journal, 16(2), 15–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • The EcoCities Spatial Portal (http://www.ppgis.manchester.ac.uk/ecocities/).

  • Tulloch, D. L., & Shapiro, T. (2003). The intersection of data access and public participation: impacting GIS users’ success? URISA Journal, 15(2), 55–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, A., & Forrest, B. (2008). Where 2.0: The State of the Geospatial Web.,http://radar.oreilly.com/research/where2-report.html

  • Yildiz, M. (2007). e-Government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward. Government Information Quarterly, 24(3), 646–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2008). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (4th ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy

    Paola Barbara Floreddu & Cabiddu Francesca

Authors
  1. Paola Barbara Floreddu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cabiddu Francesca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paola Barbara Floreddu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Business and Economics, Technological Education Institute of Thessaly Larissa, Thessaly, Greece

    Leonidas G. Anthopoulos

  2. Department of Public Administration, The University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA

    Christopher G. Reddick

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Floreddu, P.B., Francesca, C. (2014). Assessing Public Participation Through Different Lens: The Case of Public Participation Geographic Information Systems. In: Anthopoulos, L., Reddick, C. (eds) Government e-Strategic Planning and Management. Public Administration and Information Technology, vol 3. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8462-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation