Advertisement

Simulation Modeling

  • Lily Elefteriadou
Chapter
Part of the Springer Optimization and Its Applications book series (SOIA, volume 84)

Abstract

Simulation is generally defined as an imitation of a system or process, while computer simulation is the replication of a system or a process on a computer. Simulation has been used in many fields in order to understand interactions between system components or evaluate alternative designs. It is routinely used in various and very diverse environments, including the training of pilots using flight simulators, in weather prediction, in the design of communications networks, as well as in entertainment (e.g., video games).

In transportation, simulation is used to study various aspects of the system, including port, airport, and rail operations, demand modeling, interactions between land use and transportation, and traffic operations. The use of computer simulation models has become particularly prevalent among transportation practitioners and researchers. Such models typically replicate the movement of units of traffic (automobiles, buses, pedestrians, etc.) along a simulated network, considering the interactions between the environment, the vehicle, and the driver. Simulation can be very helpful in evaluating alternative solutions for transportation systems where analytical techniques cannot be applied or are not available, and it can consider the effects of microscopic characteristics such as individual driver behavior and vehicle characteristics.

Keywords

Queue Length Interarrival Time Vehicle Movement Traffic Stream Service Distribution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Supplementary material

References

  1. 1.
    Elefteriadou L, List G, Leonard J, Lieu H, Thomas M, Giguere R, Brewish R, Johnson G (1999) Beyond the highway capacity manual: a framework for selecting simulation models in traffic operational analyses. Transportation Research Record 1678. National Academy Press, pp 96–106Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alexiadis V, Jeannotte K, Chandra A (2004) Traffic analysis toolbox: volume I: traffic analysis tools primer. Report FHWA-HRT-04-038, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC, June 2004Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Transportation Research Board, National Academies of Science (2010) Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Knuth D (1997) Chapter 3: random numbers. In: The art of computer programming, volume 2. Semi numerical algorithms, 3rd edn. ISBN: 0321751043Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP (2007) Chapter 7: random numbers. In: Numerical recipes: the art of scientific computing, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, ISBN 978-0-521-88068-8Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sun DJ (2009) A lane-changing model for urban arterial streets. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of FloridaGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kondyli A, Elefteriadou L (2011) Modeling driver behavior at freeway-ramp merges. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, No 2249, Washington, DC, Jan 2011, pp 29–37Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    CORSIM User’s Guide (2006) FHWA US Department of Transportation. Office of Operations Research, Development and Technology, McLean, VAGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
    Sun D, Elefteriadou L (2011) Information categorization based on driver behavior for urban lane changing maneuvers. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, No 2249, Washington, DC, Jan 2011, pp 86–94Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sun D, Elefteriadou L (2010) Research and implementation of lane changing model based on driver behavior. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No 2161, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kondyli A, Elefteriadou L (2009) Driver behavior at freeway-ramp merging areas: focus group findings. Transportation Research Record 2124. National Academy Press, pp 157–166Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dowling R, Skabardonis A, Alexiadis V (2004) Traffic analysis toolbox volume III: guidelines for applying traffic microsimulation software. Report FHWA-HRT-04-040, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC, June 2004Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schriber TJ (1991) An introduction to simulation using GPSS/H. Wiley, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wicks DA, Lieberman ED (1976) Development and testing of INTRAS a microscopic freeway simulation model, volume I. Program design and parameter calibration, KLD Associates, FHWA-RD-76- 75, Final Report, pp 146Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Halati A, Lieu H, Walker S (1997) CORSIM—Corridor traffic simulation model. In: Traffic congestion and traffic safety in the 21st century: challenges, innovations, and opportunities. American Society of Civil Engineers, pp 570–576Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rioux T (1977) TEXAS—a microscopic traffic simulation package for isolated intersections. University of Texas, Center for Highway Research, Austin, TXGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bullen AGR, Hummon N, Bryer T, Nekmat R (1987) EVIPAS: a computer model for the optimal design of a vehicle actuated traffic signal. Transp Res Rec 1114:103–110Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yang Q, Koutsopoulos HN (1996) A microscopic traffic simulator for evaluation of dynamic traffic management systems. Transp Res Part C 4:113–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fritzsche H (1994) A model for traffic simulation. Traffic Eng Control 35(5):317–321Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lily Elefteriadou
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Coastal EngineeringUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations