Skip to main content

Pricing and Management Related to P2P and Mobile Internet

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Internet Resource Pricing Models

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Computer Science ((BRIEFSCOMPUTER))

  • 959 Accesses

Abstract

With the rapid development of the Internet, the amount and types of network applications have increased significantly, and hence the traffic. On the other hand, consumer’s demand for network resources is also becoming more and more intense. Although easy to implement, the traditional flat pricing makes the utilization rate of network resources drop significantly. Especially since the appearance of new network applications like P2P, the cost of network operation has soared, while the profit of ISPs has decreased notably. As a countermeasure, many ISPs, such as AT&T, Verizon and Comcast have abandoned the traditional flat pricing and adopted the traffic-based hierarchical pricing method instead [43] [Shen, S. IEEE Commun. Mag. 50(11):91–99]. which has thus become a hot topic. At the same time, as the Internet market has become more mature, the competition between ISPs and content providers (CPs) have been brought into full play. Therefore, games appear frequently in resource pricing analyses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aggarwal, V., Feldmann, A., Scheideler, C.: Can ISPs and P2P users cooperate for improved performance? ACM SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev. 37(3), 29–40 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Altman, E., Bernhard, P., Caron, S., et al.: A study of non-neutral networks with usage-based prices. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Economic Traffc Management (ETM)’10, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 76–84 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Altman, E., Hanawal, M.K., Sundaresan, R.: Nonneutral network and the role of bargaining power in side payments. In: Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Network Control and Optimization (NETCOOP)’10, Ghent, Belgium, 66–73 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Altman, E., Legout, A., Xu, Y.: Network non-neutrality debate: an economic analysis. CoRR abs/1012.5862. http://arxiv.org/abs/1012.5862 (2010)

  5. Altmanna, J., Chu, K.: How to charge for network services: flat-rate or usage-based? Comput. Netw. 36(5–6), 519–531 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. An-Gang, H. Yong, Guo: From monopoly market to competitive market: the deep social change. Reform Theory 5, 10–13 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bakos, Y., Brynjolfsson, E.: Bundling information goods: pricing, profits, and efficiency. Manage. Sci. 45(12), 1613–1630 (1999)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Baumol, W.J., Blinder, A.S., Gale, C.L.: Microeconomics: Principles and Policy. Cincinnati: South-Western Educational Publishing 2001: 212 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Binmore, K., Rubinstein, A., Wolinsky, A.: The nash bargaining solution in economic modelling. RAND J. Econ. 17, 176–188 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. BitTorrent. http://bittorrent.com

  11. Cheng, B., Stein, L., Jin, H., et al.: GridCast: improving peer sharing for P2P VoD. ACM Trans. Multimedia Comput. Commun. Appl. 4(4), 1–31 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Choffnes, D.R., Bustamante, F.: Taming the torrent: a practical approach to reducing cross- ISP traffic in peer-to-peer systems. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM 2008, Seattle, 363–374 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chun-Yan, Z., Ke X., Bao-Jin, W., Meng, S.: Optimizing cost and performance in multiple interface mobile hosts. Chin. J. Comput. 34(11), 2176–2186 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. CNNIC. http://www.cnnic.net.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/hlwtjbg/201301/t20130115_38508.htm

  15. Dimitropoulos, X., Hurley, P., Stoecklin, A.K.M.: on the 95-percentile billing method. In: Proceedings of the 10th Passive and Active Measurement Conference (PAM), Seoul, South Korea, 207–216 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Friedman, J. W.: Oligopoly and the Theory of Games. North-Holland Publisher, Amsterdam and New York (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Harrison, A.E.: Productivity, imperfect competition and trade reform: theory and evidence. J. Int. Econ. 36(1–2), 53–73 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hei, X., Liang, C., Liu, Y., et al.: A measurement study of a large-scale P2P iptv system. IEEE Trans. Multimedia 9(8), 1672–1687 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Huan, H. Ke, X. Ying, L.: Internet resource pricing models, mechanisms and methods. Networking Sci. 1, 48–66 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Huang, Y., Fu, T.Z.J., Chiu, D.M., et al.: Challenges, design and analysis of a large-scale P2P-VoD system. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM, Seattle, 375–388 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Huang, C., Li, J., Ross, K.W.: Can internet video-on-demand be profitable? In: Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM 2007, Kyoto, Japan, 133–144 January (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jiang, W., Zhang-Shen, R., Rexford, J., et al.: Cooperative content distribution and traffic engineering in an ISP network. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGMETRICS 2009, Seattle, 239–250 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Karagiannis, T., Rodriguez, P., Papagiannaki, E.: Should internet service providers fear peer-assisted content distribution? In: Proceedings of the 2005 Internet Measurement Conference (IMC), Berkeley (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kaya, A., Chiang, M., Trappe, W.: P2P-ISP cooperation: risks and mitigation in multiple-ISP networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE GLOBECOM 2009, Honolulu, HI, 1–8 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Keon, N., Anandalingam, G.: A new pricing model for competitive telecommunications services using congestion discounts. INFORMS J. Comput. 17(4), 248–262 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Lin, S., Xu, K., Wu, J.P., Wang, N., Zhang, Z., Zhong, Y.F.: Will the three-network convergence happen?—an evolution model based analysis. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Communications in China 2012, 149–154. IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Liu, J. Wang, H.: Understanding peer distribution in the global internet. IEEE Netw. 24(4), 40–44 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ma, z., Xu, K., Liu, J., Wang, H.: Measurement, modeling and enhancement of bitTorrent-based VoD system. Comput. Netw. 56(3), 1103–1117 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ma, R.T.B., Chiu, D., Lui, J.C.S., et al.: Internet economics: the use of Shapley value for ISP settlement. In: Proceedings of ACM CoNEXT 2007, New York, 775–787 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ma, R.T., Chiu, D.M., Lui, J.C.S., Misra, V., Rubenstein, D.: Interconnecting eyeballs to content: a shapley value perspective on ISP peering and settlement. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Economics of Networked Systems, Seattle, 61–66 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ma, R.T.B., Misra, V., Chiu, D., et al.: On cooperative settlement between content, transit and eyeball internet service providers. In: Proceedings of ACM CoNEXT 2008, 802–815 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ma, R.T.B., Lee, S.C.M., Liu, J.C.S., et al.: Incentive and service differentiation in P2P networks: a game theoretic approach. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 14(5), 978–991 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ma, R.T., Chiu, D.M., Lui, J.C.S., Misra, V., Rubenstein, D.: On cooperative settlement between content, transit, and eyeball internet service providers. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 19(3), 802–815 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Maximizing BitTorrent Speeds with uTorrent (Guide/Tutorial) http://www.bootstrike.com/Articles/BitTorrentGuide/

  35. Misra, V., Ioannidis, S., Chaintreau, A., et al.: Incentivizing peer-assisted services: a fluid shapley value approach. In: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM SIGMETRICS 2010, 215–226 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Nash, J.F.: The bargaining problem. Econometrica: Int. Econometric Soc. 155–162 (1950)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Notz, W.: International private agreements in the form of cartels, cyndicates, and other combinations. J. Polit. Econ. 28(8), 658–679 (1920)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Novshek, W., Sonnenschein, H.: General equilibrium with free entry: a synthetic approach to the theory of perfect competition. J. Econ. Lit. 25(3), 1281–1306 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Osborne, M., Rubinstein, A.: A Course in Game Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. PPLive. http://www.pplive.com

  41. PPStream. http://www.ppstream.com

  42. Rodriguez, P., Tan, S.M., Gkantsidis, C.: On the feasibility of commercial, legal P2P content distribution. ACM SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev. 36(1), 75–78 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Sen, S., Joe-Wong, C., Ha, S., Chiang, M.: Incentivizing time-shifting of data: a survey of time-dependent pricing for internet access. IEEE Commun. Mag. 50(11), 91–99 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Shen, H.-X., and Basar, T.: Optimal nonlinear pricing for a monopolistic network service provider with complete and incomplete information. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 25(6), 1216–1223. August 2007

    Google Scholar 

  45. Shen, G., Wang, Y., Xiong, Y., et al.: HPTP: relieving the tension between ISPs and P2P. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Peer-to-Peer Systems (IPTPS), Bellevue (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Suh, K., Diot, C., Kurose, J., et al.: Push-to-peer video-on-demand system: design and evaluation. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 25(9), 1706–1716 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. UUSee. http://www.uusee.com

  48. Valancius, V., Laoutaris, N., Massoulie, L., et al.: Greening the internet with nano data centers. In: Proceedings of the ACM CoNEXT 2009, Rome, Italy, 37–48 December 2009

    Google Scholar 

  49. Vytautas,V., Cristian, L., Nick, F.: How many tiers? Pricing in the internet transit market. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2011 Conference, Toronto, ON, Canada, 194–205 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Wang, Q., Chiu, D.M., and Lui, J.C.S.: ISP uplink pricing in a competitive market. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Telecommunications, St. Petersburg, Russia, 1–6 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Wang, Q., Chiu, D., Lui, J.C.: ISP uplink pricing in a competitive market. In: Proceedings of the 15th Annual International Conference on Telecommunications (ICT)’08, St. Petersburg, Russia, 1–6 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Wang, J.H., Chiu, D.M., Lui, J.C.S.: A game-theoretic analysis of the implications of overlay network traffc on ISP peering. Comput. Netw. 52(15), 2961–2974 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  53. Wei-Ying, Z.: Game Theory and Information Economics. Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Publishing House (2nd edition) (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Winter, E.: The Shapley Value. North-Holland: In: Aumzann, R.J., Hart, S., (eds.) The Handbook of Game Theory. pp. 295–303 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Xie, H., Yang, Y.R., Krishnamurthy, A., et al.: P4P: provider portal for applications. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM 2008, Seattle, 351–362 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Xi-Ren, C., Hong-Xia, S.: Internet pricing with a game theoretical approach: concepts and examples. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 10(2), 208–216 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Xu, K., Li, H., Liu, J., Zhu, W., Wang, W.: PPVA: A universal and transparent peer-to-peer accelerator for interactive online video sharing. In: Proceedings of IWQoS 2010. 1–9 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Xu, K., Shen, M., Ye, M.: A model approach to estimate peer-to-peer traffic matrices. In: Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM 2011, 676–684 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Xu, K., Zhong, Y.F., He, H.: Can P2P technology benefit ISPs? A cooperative profit-distribution answer. http://arxiv.org/abs/1212.4915

  60. Yaiche, H., Mazumdar, R.R., Rosenberg, C.: Game theoretic framework for bandwidth allocation and pricing in broadband networks. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 8(5), 667–678 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Yuksel, M., Kalyanarama, S.: Pricing granularity for congestion sensitive pricing. In: Proceedings of Computers and Communications (ISCC 2003), Antalya, Turkey. 169–174 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ke Xu .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Xu, K., Zhong, Y., He, H. (2014). Pricing and Management Related to P2P and Mobile Internet. In: Internet Resource Pricing Models. SpringerBriefs in Computer Science. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8409-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8409-7_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-8408-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-8409-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics