Silence of Signs—Power of Symbols: Rock Art, Landscape and Social Semiotics

  • David Vogt
Chapter
Part of the One World Archaeology book series (WORLDARCH, volume 8)

Abstract

Language is an important tool in social communication, but not all communication is channeled through verbal or linguistic expressions. Rock art is an example of visual symbols used in complicated systems of social communication. Rock art became an integrated part of the landscape, and through cognitive symbols, expressions were fixed in a physical, long-lasting medium. In this chapter rock art is seen through social semiotics, a theory about signs and symbols, and how they play an important part in communication between people in public space. Central to social semiotic theory is the principal of “message/reception”, the sender of the message, and the receiver of the message and the symbol convey a message. Social semiotics has uncovered that symbols and structures of symbols often serve as a medium for communication between powerful forces in society and the individual. Rock art was probably a far more diverted, cultural specific, and complex structure in prehistoric societies, therefore it is far more complicated to interpret today than we believe. In this chapter I will present a case study from South Scandinavia, and in this specific context, political control of a certain territory seems important for production of rock art.

Keywords

Clay Europe Income Expense Smoke 

References

  1. Almgren, O. (1926–27). Hällristningarochkultbruk. Stockholm.Google Scholar
  2. Althusser, L. (1971). Ideology and ideolgiocal state apparatuses. In L. Althusser (Ed.), Lenin and philosophy and other essays (pp. 127–186). New Books: London.Google Scholar
  3. Barthes, R. (1973). Mythologies. London: Paladin.Google Scholar
  4. Cowen, J. D. (1967). The Hallstatt sword of bronze: On the continent and in Britain. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, 33, 377–454.Google Scholar
  5. Crumlin-Pedersen, O. (2003). The Hjortspring boat in a ship-archaeological context. In O. Crumlin-Pedersen & A. Trakadas (Eds.), Hjortspring a pre-roman iron-age warship in context (Vol. 5). Roskilde: The Viking Ship Museum in Roskilde.Google Scholar
  6. Cunliffe, B. (1997). The ancient Celts. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  7. Demarest, A. A., & Conrad, G. W. (1992). Ideology and pre-Columbian civilization. School of American Research Advanced Seminar Series. New Mexico: Santa Fe.Google Scholar
  8. Derrida, J. (1978). Writing and difference. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Earle, T. K. (1987). Chiefdoms in archaeological and ethnohistorical perspective. Annual Review of Anthropology, 16, 279–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Earle, T. K. (1991). Chiefdoms: Power, economy and ideology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Earle, T. K. (1997). How chiefs come to power. The political economy in prehistory. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Ekhoff, E. (1880). Qville härads fasta fornlemningar. Bidrag til Göteborgs och Bohusläns Fornminnen och Historia. Länets hushållnings-sällskap.Google Scholar
  13. Ferrell, J. (1996). Crimes of Style: Urban graffiti and the politics of criminality. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Forsberg, L. (1993). En kronologisk analys av ristningarna vid Nämforsen. In L. Forsberg & T. B. Larsson (Eds.), Ekonomi och näringsformer i nordisk bronsalder (Vol. 1). Umeå: Studia Archaeologica Universitatis Umensis 3. Arkeologiska Institusjonen Umeå Universitet.Google Scholar
  15. Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse of language. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  16. Fredell, Å. (2003). Bildbroar Figurativ bildkommunikasjon av ideology ochkosmologi under sydskandinavisk bronsålder och förromers järnalder. GOTARC Serie B. Göteborg: Göteborgs Universitet.Google Scholar
  17. Fredsjö, Å. (1981). Hällristningar i Kville härad i Bohuslän. Kville socken. Del 1 och 2. - Studier i nordisk arkeologi 14/15, Göteborg.Google Scholar
  18. Giddens, A. (1981). A contemporary critique of historical materialism. London: McMillian.Google Scholar
  19. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  20. Gräslund, BO. (1996). Arkeologisk datering. Lund.Google Scholar
  21. Hawkes, T. (1977). Structuralism and semiotics. London: Methuen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hodge, R., & Kress, G. (1988). Social semiotics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Jensen, J. (1997). Fra Bronze-til Jernalder—En kronologisk undersøgelse. Nordiske Fortidsminder Serie B. København: Det Kongelige Nordiske Oldskriftselskab.Google Scholar
  24. Kristiansen, K. (1998). Europe before history. New studies in archeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Lacan, J. (1977). Écrits: A selection. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  26. Lèvi-Strauss, C. (1966). The savage mind. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
  27. Malmer, M. P. (1981). A chorological study of North European Rock Art. Stockholm: Antikvariskaserien 32. Kungl. Vitterhets Historieoch Antikvitets Akademien. Almqvist & Wiksell Internasjonal.Google Scholar
  28. Marstrander, S. (1963). Østfolds Jordbruksristninger, Skjeberg. Serie B: Skrifter LIII. Oslo: Instituttet for sammenlignende kulturforskning.Google Scholar
  29. Pare, C. F. F. (1991). Swords, wagon-graves, and the beginning the early iron age in central Europe (Vol. 37). Marburg: IKleine Schriftenausdem Vorgeschichtlichen Seminar der Phillipes-Universität.Google Scholar
  30. Pilles, P., & Vaughan, T. (2003). Supernatural and cermonialism: Yavapai rock art of the Red Rocks country, Sedona, Arizona. In Etnography and North American Rock Art. Paper presented at the 30th Annual Conference of the American Rock Art Research Association, San Bernardino, California.Google Scholar
  31. Prucel, R. W., & Bauer, A. A. (2001). Archaeological pragmatics. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 34(2), 85–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Reith, A. (1942). Die Eisentechnik der Hallstattzeit. Leipzig: Johann Ambrozius Barth Verlag.Google Scholar
  33. Ricoeur, P. (1989). Hermeneutics and the human sciences. Essays on language, action and interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Schaafsma, P. (1980). Indian Rock Art of the Southwest. School of American Research. Albuquerque: Santa Fe/University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
  35. Schauer, P. (1971). Die Schwerter in Sütddeutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz I. München: Prähistorische Bronzefunde.Google Scholar
  36. Tilley, C. (1994). A phenomenology of landscape. Places, paths and monuments. Oxford: Berg Publisher.Google Scholar
  37. Valeri, V. (1985). Kingship and Sacrifice: Ritual and Society in Ancient Hawaii. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  38. Vogt, D. (2006). Helleristningeri Østfoldog Bohuslän. En analyse av det økonomiske og politiske landskap. Acta Humaniora nr. 254. Oslo: Universiteteti Oslo.Google Scholar
  39. Vogt, D. (2011). Rock carvings in Østfold and Bohuslän, South Scandinavia. An interpretation of political and economic landscapes. Skrifter serie B. Oslo: The Institute for Comparative Research in Human Culture, Novus forlag Oslo.Google Scholar
  40. Vogt, D. (2012). Østfolds Helleristninger. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Vogt
    • 1
  1. 1.Museum of Cultural HistoryUniversity of OsloOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations