Skip to main content

Integrating Organizational Capabilities to Increase Customer Value: A Triple Interaction Effect

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
New Perspectives in Partial Least Squares and Related Methods

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics ((PROMS,volume 56))

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to contribute to the strategic management literature by identifying empirically possible combinations of three organizational capabilities and to analyze whether the possible interaction between them leads to the creation of superior customer value. We aim to determine how the interaction between three capabilities (i.e., market orientation, knowledge management and customer relationship management) is and the potential effects of this relationship for increasing customer value. In order to test this question, we model a triple interaction effect following an orthogonalization approach using partial least squares (PLS). We used data from Spanish banking industry. Surprisingly, the triple effect explains more variance of customer value than the alternative operationalizations of the three organizational capabilities linked to customer value creation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wang, Y. H., Lo, P., Chi, R., and Yang, Y., “An Integrated Framework for Customer Value and Customer-Relationship-Management Performance: A Customer-Based Perspective from China,” Managing Service Quality, 14, 169–182, 2004.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Sánchez, R., Iniesta, M. A., and Holbrook, M. B., “The Ccnceptualisation and measurement of consumer value in services,” International Journal of Market Research, 51, 93–113, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Woodruff, R.B., “Customer Value: The Next Source for Competitive Advantage,” Journal of Academic Marketing Science, 25, 139–153, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Woodruff, R.B., & Gardial, S.F., Know Your Customer: New Approaches to Understanding Customer Value and Satisfaction. Cambridge, Mass: Blackwell Business, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sirmon, D.G., Hitt, M.A., and Ireland, R.D., “Managing Firm Resources in Dynamic Environments to Create Value: Looking inside the Black Box,” Academic Management Review, 32, 273–292, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Morrow, J.L., Sirmon, D.G., Hitt, M.A., and Holcomb, T.R., “Creating Value in the Face of Declining Performance: Firm Strategies and Organizational Recovery,” Strategic Management Journal, 28, 271–283, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Henseler, J., & Chin, W. W., “A Comparison of Approaches for the Analysis of Interaction Effects Between Latent Variables Using Partial Least Squares Path Modeling.” Structural Equation Modeling, 17, 82–109, 2010.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Little, T.D., Bovaird, J.A., and Widaman, K.F., “On the merits of orthogonalizing powered and product terms: Implications for modeling interactions among latent variables,” Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 497–519, 2006.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Malhotra, N.K., and Birks, D.F., Marketing Research: An Applied Approach. Essex, UK: Financial Times/Prentice Hall, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Narver, J.C., & Slater, S.F., “The effect of a market orientation on business profitability,” Journal of Marketing, 54, 20–35, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jaworski, B.J., & Kohli, A.K., “ Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences,” Journal of Marketing, 57, 53–70, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jansen, J.J.P., Van den Bosch, F.A.J., and Volberda, H.W., “Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: How do organizational antecedents matter?” Academic Management Journal, 48 999–1015, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A., and Segars, A. H. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 185–214.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chou, T.-C., Chang, P. -L., Cheng, Y.P., and Tsai, C.-T., “A path model linking organizational knowledge attributes, information processing capabilities, and perceived usability,” Information Management, 44, 408–417, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Reinartz, W., Krafft, M., and Hoyer, W.D., “The customer relationship management process: Its measurement and impact on performance,” J Marketing Res, 41, 293–305, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hooley, G. J., Greenley, G. E., Cadogan, J. W., and Fahy, J., “The performance impact of marketing resources,” Journal of Business Research, 58, 18–27, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lance, C. E., “Residual centering, exploratory and confirmatory moderator analysis, and decomposition of effects in path models containing interactions,” Applied Psychological Measurement, 12, 163–17, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fornell, C., “A national customer satisfaction barometer: The Swedish experience,” Journal of Marketing, 56, 6–21. 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chin, W. W., “Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling,” MIS Quarterly, 22, 1–12, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Diamantopoulos, A., & Winklhofer, H., “Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale development,” Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 269–277, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ringle, C., Wende, S., and Will, A., SmartPLS, version 2.0 M2. http://www.smartpls.de, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y., “On the evaluation of structural equation models,” Journal of Academic Market Science, 16, 74–94, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F., “Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error,” Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50, 1981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mathieson, K., Peacock, E., and Chin, W. W., “Extending the technology acceptance model: The influence of perceived user resources,” The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, 32, 86–112, 2001,

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. -Y., and Podsakoff, N. P., “Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Schreyögg, G., and Kliesch-Eberl, M., “How dynamic can organizational capabilities be?” Towards a dual-process model of capability dynamization. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 913–933, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Maklan, S., and Knox, S., “Dynamic capabilities: The missing link in CRM investments,” European Journal of Marketing, 43, 1392–1410, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ambrosini, V., ND Bowman, C., “What are dynamic capabilities and are they a useful construct in strategic management?” International Journal of Management Reviews, 11, 29–49, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Luo, Y. (2000). “Dynamic capabilities in international expansion,” Journal of World Business, 35, 355–378, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Teece, D. J., “Capturing value from knowledge assets: The new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets,” California Management Review, 40, 55–79, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. McNaughton, R. B., Osborne, P., Morgan, R. E., and Kutwaroo, G., “Market orientation and firm value,” Journal of Marketing Management, 17, 521–542, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Vorakulpipat, C., & Rezgui, Y., “Value creation: The future of knowledge management,” Knowledge Engineering Review, 23, 283–294, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriel Cepeda .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cepeda, G., Martelo, S., Barroso, C., Ortega, J. (2013). Integrating Organizational Capabilities to Increase Customer Value: A Triple Interaction Effect. In: Abdi, H., Chin, W., Esposito Vinzi, V., Russolillo, G., Trinchera, L. (eds) New Perspectives in Partial Least Squares and Related Methods. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 56. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8283-3_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics