Skip to main content

Application of Partial Orders and Hasse Matrices in Ranking Contaminated Sites

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Multi-indicator Systems and Modelling in Partial Order

Abstract

Contaminated site cleanup is a multibillion dollar issue in Canada. Practical decision support tools are needed to help prioritise contaminated site cleanup funding across a portfolio of many sites. This chapter illustrates the concept of prioritising contaminated site management decisions using environmental risk, societal perception and environmental liability as the measures. Using previously published information on 20 contaminated sites located in Canada, these three aspects are combined by applying partial order concepts to prioritise sites. The authors show how societal perception and environmental liability influence site prioritisation compared to prioritisation based on environmental risk alone. They recommended additional research in quantifying the societal perception of contaminated sites prior to practical application of the concepts explained in the chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) is a contaminated site investigation where soil, sediment, soil vapour, surface water or groundwater samples are obtained and analysed for contaminants.

References

  • AECOM (AECOM Technology Corporation) (2011) Remedial Action Cost Engineering and Requirements (RACER) System, Version 11.1.12.0. Retrieved from http://www.fecpractice.com/?p=RACER

  • AENV (Alberta Environment) (2010) Alberta Tier 1 Soil and Groundwater Remediation Guidelines. Edmonton, AB. Retrieved from http://environment.gov.ab.ca/info/library/7751.pdf

  • Brüggemann R, Patil GP (2011) Ranking and prioritization for multi-indicator systems. Springer, New York, NY

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brüggemann R, Sorensen PB, Lerche D, Carlsen L (2004) Estimation of averaged ranks by a local partial order model. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 44(2):618–625. doi:10.1021/ci034214m

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlon C, Hope B, Quercia F (2009) Contaminated land: a multi-dimensional problem. In: Marcomini A, Suter GW II, Critto A (eds) Decision support systems for risk-based management of contaminated sites. Springer, New York, NY, pp 113–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsen L (2008) Hierarchical partial order ranking. Environ Pollut 155:247–253. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2007.11.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CCME (Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment) (1996) A framework for ecological risk assessment: general guidance. Winnipeg, MB. Retrieved from http://www.ccme.ca/assets/pdf/pn_1195_e.pdf

  • CCME (Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment) (1997) A framework for ecological risk assessment: technical appendices. Winnipeg, MB. Retrieved from http://www.ccme.ca/assets/pdf/pn_1274_e.pdf

  • CCME (Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment) (2006a) A protocol for the derivation of environmental and human health soil quality guidelines. Winnipeg, MB. Retrieved from http://www.ccme.ca/assets/pdf/sg_protocol_1332_e.pdf

  • CCME (Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment) (2006b) Recommended principles on contaminated site liability. Winnipeg, MB. Retrieved from http://www.ccme.ca/assets/pdf/csl_14_principles_e.pdf

  • CCME (Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment) (2008) National classification system for contaminated sites: guidance document. Winnipeg, MB. Retrieved from http://www.ccme.ca/assets/pdf/pn_1403_ncscs_guidance_e.pdf

  • EC (Environment Canada) (2012, October 4) Harper government launches Phase II of contaminated sites clean-up plan, 4 Oct 2012. Retrieved from Environment Canada. http://www.ec.gc.ca

  • Goosen H, Janssen R, Vermaat JE (2007) Decision support for participatory wetland decision-making. Ecol Eng 30(2):187–199. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2006.11.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE (2010) Multivariate data analysis, 7th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • HC (Health Canada) (2004a) Federal contaminated site risk assessment in Canada, part I: guidance on human health preliminary quantitative risk assessment (PQRA). Ottawa, ON

    Google Scholar 

  • HC (Health Canada) (2004b) Federal contaminated site risk assessment in Canada, part III: guidance on peer review of human health risk assessments for federal contaminated sites in Canada. Ottawa, ON

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasperson JX, Kasperson RE, Pidgeon N, Slovic P (2003) The social amplification of risk: assessing fifteen years of research and theory. In: Pidgeon N, Kasperson RE, Slovic P (eds) The social amplification of risk. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 13–46

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lazo JK, Kinnell JC, Fisher A (2000) Expert and layperson perceptions of ecosystem risk. Risk Anal 20(2):179–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerche D, Sorensen PB (2003) Evaluation of the ranking probabilities for partial orders based on random linear extensions. Chemosphere 53:981–992. doi:10.1016/S0045-6535(03)00558-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerche D, Sorensen PB, Brüggemann R (2003) Improved estimation of the ranking probabilities in partial orders using random linear extensions by approximation of the mutual ranking probability. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 43:1471–1480. doi:10.1021/ci0300036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauri A, Ballabio D (2008) Similarity/diversity measure for sequential data based on Hasse matrices; theory and applications. In: Pavan M, Todeschini R (eds) Scientific data ranking methods: theory and applications. Elsevier, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniels T, Axelrod LJ, Slovic P (1995) Characterizing perception of ecological risk. Risk Anal 15(5):575–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NRC (National Research Council) (1983) Risk assessment in the Federal government: managing the process. National Academy Press, Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?isbn=0309033497

  • NRC (National Research Council) (1993) Issues in risk assessment: a paradigm for ecological risk assessment. National Academy Press, Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=2078&page=241

  • NRCan (Natural Resources Canada) (2007) The Atlas of Canada-Ecological Framework. Retrieved from http://atlas.nrcan.gc.ca

  • OAG (Office of the Auditor General of Canada) (2012) Commissioner of the environment and sustainable development’s opening statement, 2012 Spring report press conference, 8 May 2012. Retrieved from Office of the Auditor General of Canada. http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca

  • Pavan M, Todeschini R (eds) (2008) Scientific data ranking methods: theory and applications. Elsevier, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandman PM (1993) Responding to community outrage. American Industrial Hygiene Association, Falls Church, VA. Retrieved from http://www.psandman.com/media/RespondingtoCommunityOutrage.pdf

  • Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S (1980) Perceived Risk. In: Schwing RC, Albers WA (eds) Societal risk assessment: how safe is safe enough? Plenum, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • TALETE (2007) DART – decision analysis by ranking techniques, Version 2.0.5. Retrieved from http://ihcp.jrc.ec.europa.eu/our_labs/predictive_toxicology/qsar_tools/DART

  • TBCS (Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat) (2011) Federal contaminated sites inventory, 24 Mar. Retrieved from Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat. http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/fcsi-rscf/home-accueil-eng.aspx

  • TBCS (Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat) (2012) Treasury Board Accounting Standard 1.2 – Departmental and Agency Financial Statements, 4 Oct. Retrieved from Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat. http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/pol/doc-eng.aspx?id=18830&section=text

  • Thiessen RJ, Achari G (2011) A comparison of 2008 National Classification System for Contaminated Sites scores to preliminary quantitative risk assessment hazard quotients. Can J Civil Eng 38(7):719–728. doi:10.1139/l11-039

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiessen RJ, Achari G (2012) Can the National Classification System for Contaminated Sites be used to rank sites? Can J Civil Eng 39(4):415–431. doi:10.1139/l2012-015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (1976) Interim procedures and guidelines for health risk and economic impact assessments of suspected carcinogens. Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (1992) Framework for ecological risk assessment. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://rais.ornl.gov/documents/FRMWRK_ERA.PDF

  • USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (2005) Human health risk assessment protocol for hazardous waste combustion facilities. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.epa.gov/osw/hazard/tsd/td/combust/risk.htm

  • USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (2012) The history of risk at EPA, 31 July. Retrieved from USEPA. http://epa.gov/risk/history.htm

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ron J. Thiessen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thiessen, R.J., Achari, G. (2014). Application of Partial Orders and Hasse Matrices in Ranking Contaminated Sites. In: Brüggemann, R., Carlsen, L., Wittmann, J. (eds) Multi-indicator Systems and Modelling in Partial Order. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8223-9_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics