Abstract
Contaminated site cleanup is a multibillion dollar issue in Canada. Practical decision support tools are needed to help prioritise contaminated site cleanup funding across a portfolio of many sites. This chapter illustrates the concept of prioritising contaminated site management decisions using environmental risk, societal perception and environmental liability as the measures. Using previously published information on 20 contaminated sites located in Canada, these three aspects are combined by applying partial order concepts to prioritise sites. The authors show how societal perception and environmental liability influence site prioritisation compared to prioritisation based on environmental risk alone. They recommended additional research in quantifying the societal perception of contaminated sites prior to practical application of the concepts explained in the chapter.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
A Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) is a contaminated site investigation where soil, sediment, soil vapour, surface water or groundwater samples are obtained and analysed for contaminants.
References
AECOM (AECOM Technology Corporation) (2011) Remedial Action Cost Engineering and Requirements (RACER) System, Version 11.1.12.0. Retrieved from http://www.fecpractice.com/?p=RACER
AENV (Alberta Environment) (2010) Alberta Tier 1 Soil and Groundwater Remediation Guidelines. Edmonton, AB. Retrieved from http://environment.gov.ab.ca/info/library/7751.pdf
Brüggemann R, Patil GP (2011) Ranking and prioritization for multi-indicator systems. Springer, New York, NY
Brüggemann R, Sorensen PB, Lerche D, Carlsen L (2004) Estimation of averaged ranks by a local partial order model. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 44(2):618–625. doi:10.1021/ci034214m
Carlon C, Hope B, Quercia F (2009) Contaminated land: a multi-dimensional problem. In: Marcomini A, Suter GW II, Critto A (eds) Decision support systems for risk-based management of contaminated sites. Springer, New York, NY, pp 113–135
Carlsen L (2008) Hierarchical partial order ranking. Environ Pollut 155:247–253. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2007.11.023
CCME (Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment) (1996) A framework for ecological risk assessment: general guidance. Winnipeg, MB. Retrieved from http://www.ccme.ca/assets/pdf/pn_1195_e.pdf
CCME (Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment) (1997) A framework for ecological risk assessment: technical appendices. Winnipeg, MB. Retrieved from http://www.ccme.ca/assets/pdf/pn_1274_e.pdf
CCME (Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment) (2006a) A protocol for the derivation of environmental and human health soil quality guidelines. Winnipeg, MB. Retrieved from http://www.ccme.ca/assets/pdf/sg_protocol_1332_e.pdf
CCME (Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment) (2006b) Recommended principles on contaminated site liability. Winnipeg, MB. Retrieved from http://www.ccme.ca/assets/pdf/csl_14_principles_e.pdf
CCME (Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment) (2008) National classification system for contaminated sites: guidance document. Winnipeg, MB. Retrieved from http://www.ccme.ca/assets/pdf/pn_1403_ncscs_guidance_e.pdf
EC (Environment Canada) (2012, October 4) Harper government launches Phase II of contaminated sites clean-up plan, 4 Oct 2012. Retrieved from Environment Canada. http://www.ec.gc.ca
Goosen H, Janssen R, Vermaat JE (2007) Decision support for participatory wetland decision-making. Ecol Eng 30(2):187–199. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2006.11.004
Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE (2010) Multivariate data analysis, 7th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
HC (Health Canada) (2004a) Federal contaminated site risk assessment in Canada, part I: guidance on human health preliminary quantitative risk assessment (PQRA). Ottawa, ON
HC (Health Canada) (2004b) Federal contaminated site risk assessment in Canada, part III: guidance on peer review of human health risk assessments for federal contaminated sites in Canada. Ottawa, ON
Kasperson JX, Kasperson RE, Pidgeon N, Slovic P (2003) The social amplification of risk: assessing fifteen years of research and theory. In: Pidgeon N, Kasperson RE, Slovic P (eds) The social amplification of risk. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 13–46
Lazo JK, Kinnell JC, Fisher A (2000) Expert and layperson perceptions of ecosystem risk. Risk Anal 20(2):179–193
Lerche D, Sorensen PB (2003) Evaluation of the ranking probabilities for partial orders based on random linear extensions. Chemosphere 53:981–992. doi:10.1016/S0045-6535(03)00558-7
Lerche D, Sorensen PB, Brüggemann R (2003) Improved estimation of the ranking probabilities in partial orders using random linear extensions by approximation of the mutual ranking probability. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 43:1471–1480. doi:10.1021/ci0300036
Mauri A, Ballabio D (2008) Similarity/diversity measure for sequential data based on Hasse matrices; theory and applications. In: Pavan M, Todeschini R (eds) Scientific data ranking methods: theory and applications. Elsevier, Oxford, UK
McDaniels T, Axelrod LJ, Slovic P (1995) Characterizing perception of ecological risk. Risk Anal 15(5):575–588
NRC (National Research Council) (1983) Risk assessment in the Federal government: managing the process. National Academy Press, Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?isbn=0309033497
NRC (National Research Council) (1993) Issues in risk assessment: a paradigm for ecological risk assessment. National Academy Press, Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=2078&page=241
NRCan (Natural Resources Canada) (2007) The Atlas of Canada-Ecological Framework. Retrieved from http://atlas.nrcan.gc.ca
OAG (Office of the Auditor General of Canada) (2012) Commissioner of the environment and sustainable development’s opening statement, 2012 Spring report press conference, 8 May 2012. Retrieved from Office of the Auditor General of Canada. http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca
Pavan M, Todeschini R (eds) (2008) Scientific data ranking methods: theory and applications. Elsevier, Oxford, UK
Sandman PM (1993) Responding to community outrage. American Industrial Hygiene Association, Falls Church, VA. Retrieved from http://www.psandman.com/media/RespondingtoCommunityOutrage.pdf
Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S (1980) Perceived Risk. In: Schwing RC, Albers WA (eds) Societal risk assessment: how safe is safe enough? Plenum, New York, NY
TALETE (2007) DART – decision analysis by ranking techniques, Version 2.0.5. Retrieved from http://ihcp.jrc.ec.europa.eu/our_labs/predictive_toxicology/qsar_tools/DART
TBCS (Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat) (2011) Federal contaminated sites inventory, 24 Mar. Retrieved from Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat. http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/fcsi-rscf/home-accueil-eng.aspx
TBCS (Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat) (2012) Treasury Board Accounting Standard 1.2 – Departmental and Agency Financial Statements, 4 Oct. Retrieved from Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat. http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/pol/doc-eng.aspx?id=18830§ion=text
Thiessen RJ, Achari G (2011) A comparison of 2008 National Classification System for Contaminated Sites scores to preliminary quantitative risk assessment hazard quotients. Can J Civil Eng 38(7):719–728. doi:10.1139/l11-039
Thiessen RJ, Achari G (2012) Can the National Classification System for Contaminated Sites be used to rank sites? Can J Civil Eng 39(4):415–431. doi:10.1139/l2012-015
USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (1976) Interim procedures and guidelines for health risk and economic impact assessments of suspected carcinogens. Washington, DC
USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (1992) Framework for ecological risk assessment. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://rais.ornl.gov/documents/FRMWRK_ERA.PDF
USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (2005) Human health risk assessment protocol for hazardous waste combustion facilities. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.epa.gov/osw/hazard/tsd/td/combust/risk.htm
USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (2012) The history of risk at EPA, 31 July. Retrieved from USEPA. http://epa.gov/risk/history.htm
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Thiessen, R.J., Achari, G. (2014). Application of Partial Orders and Hasse Matrices in Ranking Contaminated Sites. In: Brüggemann, R., Carlsen, L., Wittmann, J. (eds) Multi-indicator Systems and Modelling in Partial Order. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8223-9_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8223-9_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-8222-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-8223-9
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)