Skip to main content

Radiation Protection During CT-Guided Interventions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Percutaneous Image-Guided Biopsy
  • 1660 Accesses

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) is a valuable tool for performing certain image-guided interventions. The availability of axial images and the excellent contrast afforded by CT allows for accurate targeting of lesions. However, along with the many benefits of CT come certain risks, mainly those related to radiation exposure. Stray radiation is much more intense in CT labs compared to interventional labs and is at times directed towards the face and eyes of the physician. Patient exposure rates are often higher in CT-guided interventions than in fluoroscopically guided interventions. Therefore, adequate radiation protection is a key element of successful CT-guided procedures. The goal is to minimize the risk for both stochastic and tissue effects from radiation for both patient and operator.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The computed tomography dose index (CTDI) can be measured in several ways. CTDI100 refers to the dose measured in an acrylic phantom using a 100 mm ionization chamber during a single axial scan. CTDIvol is a calculated quantity equal to 1/3 × CTDI100 measured along the central axis of the phantom plus 2/3 × CTDI100 measured along the peripheral axis of the phantom, 1 cm below the surface. Modern CT scanners display the CTDIvol on the scan console.

References

  1. Lucas PA, Dance DR, Castellano IA, Vano E. Estimation of the peak entrance surface air kerma for patients undergoing computed tomography-guided procedures. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;114:317–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Leng S, Christner JA, Carlson SK, Jacobsen M, Vrieze TJ, Atwell TD, McCollough CH. Radiation dose levels for interventional CT procedures. Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197:W97–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nawfel RD, Judy PF, Silverman SG, Hooton S, Tuncali K, Adams DF. Patient and personnel exposure during CT fluoroscopy-guided interventional procedures. Radiology. 2000;216:180–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Balter S, Hopewell JW, Miller DL, Wagner LK, Zelefsky MJ. Fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures: a review of radiation effects on patients’ skin and hair. Radiology. 2010;254:326–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lucey BC, Varghese JC, Hochberg A, Blake MA, Soto JA. CT-guided intervention with low radiation dose: feasibility and experience. Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:1187–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. The Alliance for Radiation Safety in Pediatric Imaging. The image gently and step lightly campaigns. http://www.pedrad.org/associations/5364/ig/. Accessed Jan 2013.

  7. Hohl C, Suess C, Wildberger JE, Honnef D, Das M, Muhlenbruch G, Scahller A, Gunther RW, Mahnken AH. Dose reduction during CT fluoroscopy: phantom study of angular beam modulation. Radiology. 2008;246:519–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA). XR 25-2010, computed tomography dose check. http://www.nema.org/stds/xr25.cfm. Accessed Jan 2013.

  9. Jones AK. Is it safe? A look at exposures in the shadow of MDCT scanner gantries. Med Phys. 2008;35:2656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP). NCRP Report 168. Radiation dose management for fluoroscopically-guided interventional medical procedures. NCRP, Bethesda, MD, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kato R, Katada K, Anno H, Suzuki S, Ida Y, Koga S. Radiation dosimetry at CT fluoroscopy: physician’s hand dose and development of needle holders. Radiology. 1996;201:576–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Schueler B, Sturchio G, Landsworth R, Magnuson D. Does new lightweight leaded eyewear provide adequate radiation protection for fluoroscopists? Med Phys. 2009;36:2747–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Kyle Jones PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jones, A.K. (2014). Radiation Protection During CT-Guided Interventions. In: Ahrar, K., Gupta, S. (eds) Percutaneous Image-Guided Biopsy. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8217-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8217-8_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-8216-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-8217-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics