Abstract
Having introduced the LID approach in Chap. 2, we now take an alternative approach to modeling the residual income dynamic, premised on the notion of “capital following profitability.” As previously explained, the linear approach ignores firms’ active decision-making in the value-generation process and treats decision-making either as absent altogether (Ohlson 1995) or following a mechanical path that does not respond to the changing environment (Feltham and Ohlson 1995, 1996). In this chapter, we recognize the importance of capital investment decisions and assume that the accounting system yields signals which are useful for guiding these decisions. In a world where economic agents (that is, company managers and investors) seek to enhance value and increase wealth, they will rationally allocate capital to investment opportunities that yield high rather than low returns. The notion of capital following profitability accords with economic intuition and is widely reflected in actual business practice. For example, firms commonly adopt the NPV criterion to determine whether investment projects are acceptable, and rely on profitability information (such as return on assets, ROA) in internal resource allocation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Note, however, that managers’ interests are not always in conflict with those of investors. For example, when faced with positive NPV investment opportunities, both groups would prefer to invest more.
- 2.
In the alternative, “abnormal” case, a firm that is currently losing more money can divest assets so rapidly that its expected loss for the next period is smaller than that of another firm that is currently less unprofitable. Such a result would be counterintuitive, as whatever divestment action taken by the former (more unprofitable) firm can always be duplicated by the other, which will therefore be in a better position next period than the former firm anyway.
References
Beaver, W. H. (1970). The time series behavior of earnings. Journal of Accounting Research, 8, 62–89.
Biddle, G., Chen, P., & Zhang, G. (2001). When capital follows profitability: Nonlinear residual income dynamics. Review of Accounting Studies, 6, 229–265.
Brooks, L. D., & Buckmaster, D. A. (1976). Further evidence on the time series properties of accounting income. Journal of Finance, 31(5), 1359–1373.
Dechow, P. M., Hutton, A. P., & Sloan, R. G. (1999). An empirical assessment of the residual income valuation model. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 26(1–3), 1–34.
Fama, E., & French, K. (2000). Forecasting profitability and earnings. Journal of Business. 73, 161–175.
Feltham, G. A., & Ohlson, J. A. (1995). Valuation and clean surplus accounting for operating and financial activities. Contemporary Accounting Research, 11(2), 689–731.
Feltham, G. A., & Ohlson, J. A. (1996). Uncertain resolution and the theory of depreciation measurement. Journal of Accounting Research, 34(2), 209–234.
Freeman, R. N., Ohlson, J. A., & Penman, S. H. (1982). Book rate-of-return and prediction of earnings changes: An empirical investigation. Journal of Accounting Research, 20(2), 639–653.
Ohlson, J. A. (1995). Earnings, book values, and dividends in equity valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 11(2), 661–687.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zhang, G. (2014). Capital Following Profitability: Why the Residual Income Dynamic Is Nonlinear. In: Accounting Information and Equity Valuation. Springer Series in Accounting Scholarship, vol 6. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8160-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8160-7_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-8159-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-8160-7
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)