Fair Value Accounting and Income Measurement: An Application to Standard Setting

  • Guochang Zhang
Part of the Springer Series in Accounting Scholarship book series (KLAS, volume 6)


In this chapter, we employ the ROM framework outlined in previous chapters to address the relevance of fair value accounting for equity valuation purposes. In recent times, companies worldwide are increasingly required to adopt fair value measurement for financial reporting, moving gradually away from the historical cost convention. This shift is widely believed to have important ramifications for both firms and user groups, but its exact impact is not yet well understood. By extending the ROM developed in previous chapters, we explore here how, and to what extent, fair value measures help to convey an enterprise’s income generation in a way that is pertinent to equity investors.


Cash Flow Operating Activity Financial Asset Equity Investor Income Measure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Special Acknowledgment

The research presented in this chapter was initiated and mostly conducted under the aegis of the International Association for Accounting Education and Research (IAAER) & KPMG Reporting Financial Performance Research Program. The author thanks the IAAER, KPMG, and the University of Illinois for financial support through the Program. Helpful comments were received from Mary Barth, Gary Biddle, Peter Chen, Steve Matsunaga, Katherine Schipper, Donna Street, and participants in the Reporting Financial Performance Workshops held in Bordeaux, New York, and Istanbul, and the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology workshop.


  1. Barth, M. E. (2004). Fair values and financial statement volatility. In C. Borio, W. C. Hunter, G. G. Kaufman, & K. Tsatsaronis (Eds.), The market discipline across countries and industries. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
  2. Barth, M. E. (2006a). Research standard setting and global financial reporting. Foundations and Trends® in Accounting, 1, 71–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barth, M. E. (2006b). Including estimates of the future in today’s financial statements. Accounting Horizons, 20(3), 271–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benston, G. J. (2008). The shortcomings of fair-value accounting described in SFAS 157. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 27(2), 101–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bleck, A., & Gao P. (2010). Where does the information in mark-to-market come from? (Working paper). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  6. Christensen, H., & Nikolaev, V. (2013). Does fair value accounting for non-financial assets pass the market test? (Working paper). University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  7. Dichev, I. D. (2008). On the balance sheet-based model of financial reporting. Accounting Horizons, 22(4), 453–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Feltham, G. A., & Ohlson, J. A. (1995). Valuation and clean surplus accounting for operating and financial activities. Contemporary Accounting Research, 11(2), 689–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hicks, J. (1946). Value and capital (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  10. International Accounting Standard Board and Financial Accounting Standard Board (IASB/FASB). (2005a, June). Information for Observers. Joint International Group on Performance Reporting. IASB/FASB.Google Scholar
  11. International Accounting Standard Board and Financial Accounting Standard Board (IASB/FASB). (2005b, January). Information for Observers. Joint International Group on Performance Reporting. IASB/FASB.Google Scholar
  12. International Accounting Standard Board and Financial Accounting Standard Board (IASB/FASB). (2007, October). Information for Observers. IASB/FASB.Google Scholar
  13. Johnson, T. L. (2005). Relevance and Reliability: The FASB report. Retrieved from
  14. Lambert, R. (2010). Discussion of “implications for GAAP from an analysis of positive research in accounting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2–3), 287–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lu, T., Sapra, H., & Subramanian, A. (2011). Agency conflicts, prudential regulation, and marking to market (Working paper). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  16. Nissim, D., & Penman, S. (2007). The boundaries of fair value accounting (Working paper). Center for excellence in accounting and security research, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  17. Schipper, K. (2005, August). Fair values in financial reporting. Presentation at American Accounting Association Meetings. Retrieved from

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guochang Zhang
    • 1
  1. 1.Hong Kong University of Science and TechnologyKowloonHong Kong SAR

Personalised recommendations