Advertisement

The Corporate Governance Effects of Audit Committee

  • Stuart Turley
  • Mahbub ZamanEmail author

Abstract

This chapter provides a synthesis and evaluation of empirical research on the governance effects associated with audit committees. Given recent policy recommendations in several countries aimed at strengthening these committees, it is important to establish what research evidence demonstrates about their existing governance contribution. A framework for analyzing the impact of audit committees is described, identifying potential perceived effects which may have led to their adoption and documented effects on aspects of the audit function, on financial reporting quality and on corporate performance. It is also shown that most of the existing research has focused on factors associated with audit committee existence, characteristics, and measures of activity and there is very little evidence on the processes associated with the operation of audit committees and the manner in which they influence organizational behavior. It is clear that there is no automatic relationship between the adoption of audit committee structures or characteristics and the achievement of particular governance effects, and caution may be needed over expectations that greater codification around factors such as audit committee members’ independence and expertise as the means of “correcting” past weaknesses in the arrangements for audit committees. The most fundamental question concerning what difference audit committees make in practice continues to be an important area for research development. For future research we suggest: (1) greater consideration of the organizational and institutional contexts in which audit committees operate; (2) explicit theorization of the processes associated with audit committee operation; (3) complementing extant research methods with field studies; and (4) investigation of unintended as well as expected consequences of audit committees.

Keywords

Corporate Governance Audit Committee Corporate Performance Audit Firm Internal Auditor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. AARF. (1997). Audit Committees: Best Practice Guide, Australia: Australian Accounting Research Foundation, Australian Institute of Company Directors and Institute of internal Auditors.Google Scholar
  2. Abbott, L. J., & Parker S. (2000). Auditor selection and audit committee characteristics. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 19(2), 47–66.Google Scholar
  3. Abbott, L. J., Park, Y., & Parker, S. (2000). The effects of audit committee activity and independence on corporate fraud. Managerial Finance, 26(11), 55–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Adams, M. (1997). Determinants of audit committee formation in the life insurance industry: New Zealand evidence. Journal of Business Research, 38(2), 123–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Allison, D. L. (1994). Internal auditors and audit committees. Internal Auditor, February, pp. 50–55.Google Scholar
  6. APB. (1994). The audit agenda. London: Auditing Practices Board.Google Scholar
  7. Apostolou, B. (1990). The role of internal auditor communication with the audit committee. Internal Auditing Fall, 6(2), 35–42.Google Scholar
  8. Archambeault, D., & DeZoort, T. (2001). Auditor opinion shopping and the audit committee: an analysis of suspicious auditor switches. International Journal of Auditing, 5, 33–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Assiri, S. M., & Sherer M. (2000). Outsourcing the internal audit function: an empirical evaluation of benefits and pitfalls. Paper presented at the 6th Annual Midyear AAA Auditing Section Conference, California.Google Scholar
  10. Australian Treasury. (2002). Corporate disclosure: strengthening the financial reporting framework. CLERP9, Department of Treasury, Commonwealth of Australia. http://www.treasury.gov.au.
  11. Beasley, M. S. (1996). Board of director composition and financial statement fraud. Accounting Review, 71(4), 443–465.Google Scholar
  12. Beasley, M. S., Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., & Lapides, P. D. (2000). Fraudulent financial reporting: consideration of industry traits and corporate governance mechanisms. Accounting Horizons, 14(4), 441–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Beattie, V., Fearnley, S., & Brandt, R. (2000). Behind the audit report: a descriptive study of discussions and negotiations between auditors and directors. International Journal of Auditing, 4, 177–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bell, T., Morris, F., Solomon, I., & Thomas, H. (1997). Auditing organizations through a strategic-systems lens. Montvale, NJ: KPMG Peat Marwick LLP.Google Scholar
  15. Benston, G. J., & Hartgraves, A. L. (2002). Enron: what happened and what we can learn from it. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 21, 105–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Blue Ribbon Committee. (1999). Report and recommendations of the blue ribbon committee on improving the effectiveness of corporate audit committees. NY: NYSE and NASD.Google Scholar
  17. Bradbury, M. E. (1990). The incentives for voluntary audit committee formation. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 9, 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Brickley, J. A., Coles, J. L., & Terry, R. L. (1994). Outside directors and the adoption of poison pills. Journal of Financial Economics, 35, 371–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Byrd, J. W., & Hickman, K. A. (1992). Do outside directors monitor managers? Evidence from tender offer bids. Journal of Financial Economics, 32(2), 195–221.Google Scholar
  20. Cadbury Committee. (1992). Financial aspects of corporate governance. London: Gee Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  21. Carcello, J. V., & Neal, T. L. (2000). Audit committee composition and auditor reporting. Accounting Review, 75(4), 453–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Carcello, J. V., & Neal, T. L. (2003). Audit committee characteristics and auditor dismissals following ‘new’ going-concern reports. Accounting Review, 78(1), 95–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cohen, J., & Hanno D. (2000). Auditors consideration of corporate governance and management philosophy in preplanning and planning judgments. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 19(2), 133–146.Google Scholar
  24. Cohen Commission. (1978). Report of the commission on auditors’ responsibilities, AICPA.Google Scholar
  25. Cohen, J., Krishnamoorthy, G., & Wright, A. M. (2002). Corporate governance and the audit process. Contemporary Accounting Research, 19(4), 573–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Collier, P. (1992). Audit committees in large UK companies. London: ICAEW Research Board.Google Scholar
  27. Collier, P. (1993). Factors affecting the formation of audit committees in major UK listed companies. Accounting and Business Research, 23(91A), 421–430.Google Scholar
  28. Collier, P. (1996). The rise of the audit committee in UK quoted companies: a curious phenomenon? Accounting, Business and Financial History, 6(2), 121–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Collier, P., & Gregory, A. (1996). Audit committee effectiveness and the audit fee. European Accounting Review, 5(2), 177–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Collier, P., & Gregory, A. (1999). Audit committee activity and agency costs. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 18, 311–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. COSO. (1994). Internal control: Integrated framework. New York: Coopers and Lybrand/Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.Google Scholar
  32. Cottell, P. G., & Rankin, L. J. (1988). Do audit committees bias auditor selection? Akron Business and Economic Review, 19(4), 87–103. Winter.Google Scholar
  33. Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Ellstrand, A. E., & Johnson, L. J. (1998). Meta-analytic review of board composition, leadership structure and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 269–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. P. (1996). Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation: An analysis of firms subject to enforcement action by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Research, 13(1), 1–36. Spring.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. DeFond, M. L., & Jiambalvo, J. (1991). Incidence and circumstances of accounting errors. Accounting Review, July 66(3), 643–655.Google Scholar
  36. DeZoort, F. T. (1997). An investigation of audit committees’ oversight responsibilities. Abacus, 33(2), 208–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. DeZoort, F. T. (1998). An analysis of experience effects on audit committee members’ oversight judgments. Accounting Organizations and Society, 23(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. DeZoort, F. T., & Salterio, S. (2000). The effects of corporate governance experience and financial reporting and audit knowledge on audit committee members’ judgments. Working Paper, University of South Carolina.Google Scholar
  39. Eichenseher, J. W., & Shields, D. (1985). Corporate director liability and monitoring preferences. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 4, 13–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Fama, E., & Jensen, M. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 301–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Goodwin, J., & Seow, J. L. (2002). The influence of corporate governance mechanisms on the prevention and detection of control weaknesses, fraud and error: The perceptions of auditors and directors. Accounting and Finance, 42, 195–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Guy, D. M., & Zeff, S.A. (2002). Independence and objectivity: Retired partners on audit committee. CPA Journal July, pp. 31–34.Google Scholar
  43. Gwilliam, D., & Kilcommins, M. (1998). The impact of audit firm size and audit committee on perceptions of auditor independence and financial statement reliability in Ireland. Irish Accounting Review, 5(1), 23–56.Google Scholar
  44. Haka, S., & Chalos, P. (1990). Evidence of agency conflict among management, auditors, and the audit committee chair. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 9, 271–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hatherly, D. (1999). The future of auditing: The debate in the UK. European Accounting Review, 8(1), 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hatherly, D., Innes, J., & Brown, T. (1998). Free-form reporting and perceptions of the audit. British Accounting Review, 30(1), 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Higgs, D. (2003). Review of the role and effectiveness of non-executive directors. London: Department of Trade and Industry.Google Scholar
  48. ICAEW. (1997). Audit committees: A framework for assessment. London: ICAEW Audit Faculty.Google Scholar
  49. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Jeppesen, K. K. (1998). Reinventing auditing, defining consulting and independence. European Accounting Review, 7(3), 517–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kalbers, L. P., & Fogarty, T.J. (1993). Audit committee effectiveness: an empirical investigation of the contribution of power. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 12(1), 24–49.Google Scholar
  52. Kalbers, L. P., & Fogarty, T. J. (1998). Organizational and economic explanations of audit committee oversight. Journal of Managerial Issues, 10(2), 129–151.Google Scholar
  53. Klein, A. (1998a). Economic determinants of audit committee composition and activity. Stern School of Business Working Paper, New York University.Google Scholar
  54. Klein, A. (1998b). Firm performance and board committee structure. Journal of Law and Economics, 41, 275–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Klein, A. (2002). Audit committee, board of directors characteristics and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33, 375–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Knapp, M. C. (1987). An empirical study of audit committee support for auditors involved in technical disputes with client management. Accounting Review, 62(3), 578–588.Google Scholar
  57. Knapp, M. C. (1991). Factors that audit committee members use as surrogates for audit quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 10(1), 35–52.Google Scholar
  58. KPMG. (1999). The financial statement audit: Why a new age requires an evolving methodology. Montvale, NJ: KPMG LLP.Google Scholar
  59. Kunitake, W. (1981). Do audit committees favor the large CPA firms. Journal of Accountancy, August, pp. 43–45.Google Scholar
  60. Kunitake, W. (1983). Auditor changes by audit committees and outside directors. Akron Business and Economic Review, Fall, pp. 48–52.Google Scholar
  61. Lee, T. (2001). A crisis of confidence: US auditing in the 21st century. International Journal of Auditing, 5(1), 1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Lee, T., & Stone, M. (1997). Economic agency and audit committees: Responsibilities and membership composition. International Journal of Auditing, 1(2), 97–116.Google Scholar
  63. Lemon, W. M., Tatum, K. M., & Turley, W. S. (2000). Developments in the audit methodologies of large accounting firms. London: Auditing Practices Board.Google Scholar
  64. Lindsell, D. (1992). Blueprint for an effective audit committee. Accountancy, December, p. 104.Google Scholar
  65. Manson, S., & Zaman, M. (2001). Auditor communication in an evolving environment: Going beyond SAS 600 auditors’ reports on financial statements. British Accounting Review, 33, 113–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Marsh, H. L., & Powell T. E. (1989). The audit committee charter: Rx for fraud prevention. Journal of Accountancy, February, pp. 5–57.Google Scholar
  67. Mautz, R. K., & Neumann, F. L. (1970). Corporate audit committees. Illinois: Bureau of Economic and Business Research, University of Illinois.Google Scholar
  68. McHugh, J., & Raghunandan, K. (1994). Hiring and firing the chief internal auditor. Internal Auditor, August, pp. 34–39.Google Scholar
  69. McMullen, D. A. (1996). Audit committee performance: An investigation of the consequences associated with audit committees. Auditing: Journal of Practice and Theory, 15(1), 87–103.Google Scholar
  70. Menon, K., & Williams, J. D. (1994). The use of audit committees for monitoring. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 13, 121–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Morse, A., & Keegan, M. (1999). Audit committees: Good practices for meeting market expectations. London: PricewaterhouseCoopers.Google Scholar
  72. NCFFR. (1987). Report of the national commission on fraudulent financial reporting (Treadway Commission), New York: AICPA.Google Scholar
  73. O’Sullivan, N. (1999). Board characteristics and audit pricing post-cadbury: A research note. European Accounting Review, 8(2), 253–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. O’Sullivan, N. (2000). The impact of board composition and ownership on audit quality: Evidence from large UK companies. British Accounting Review, 32, 397–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Parker, S. (2000). The association between audit committee characteristics and the conservatism of financial reporting. Paper presented at the American Accounting Association 2000 Annual Conference.Google Scholar
  76. Peasnell, K.V., Pope P., & Young S. (1999). Characteristics of firms subject to adverse financial reporting review panel rulings. Paper presented at the Financial Accounting and Auditing Research Conference, 12–13 July, SOAS, University of London.Google Scholar
  77. Peasnell, K. V., Pope, P., & Young, S. (2000). Accrual management to meet earnings targets: UK evidence pre- and post- Cadbury. British Accounting Review, 32, 415–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Pincus, K., Rusbarsky, M., & Wong, J. (1989). Voluntary formation of corporate audit committees among NASDAQ firms. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 8, 239–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Pong, C., & Turley, S. (1997). Audit firms and the market. In M. Sherer & S. Turley (Eds.), Current issues in auditing. London: Paul Chapman.Google Scholar
  80. Powers Report. (2002). Report of Investigation by the Special Investigative Committee of the Board of Directors of Enron Corporation, February.Google Scholar
  81. Price Waterhouse. (1997). Audit committees: A study in European corporate governance. London: Price Waterhouse.Google Scholar
  82. Rezaee, Z., & Farmer L. E. (1994). The changing role of the audit committee. Internal Auditor, Spring, pp. 10–20.Google Scholar
  83. Rosentein, S., & Wyatt, J. G. (1990). Outside Directors, Board independence, and Shareholder Wealth. Journal of Financial Economics, 26, 175–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Scarbrough, D. P., Rama, D. V., & Raghunandan, K. (1998). Audit committee composition and interaction with internal auditing: Canadian evidence. Accounting Horizons, 12(1), 51–62.Google Scholar
  85. Schroeder, M. S., Solomon, I., & Vickrey D. (1986). Audit quality: The perceptions of audit committee chairpersons and audit partners. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 5(2), 86–94.Google Scholar
  86. SEC. (2002). Disclosure required by section 404, 406 and 407 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, securities and exchange commission release no. 33-8138. http://www.sec.gov/rules/ proposed/33-8138.htm.
  87. Shivdasani, A. (1993). Board composition, ownership structure, and hostile take-overs. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 16, 167–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Smith Committee. (2003). Audit committees: Combined code guidance, Financial Reporting Council.Google Scholar
  89. Sommer, A. A. (1991). Auditing audit committees: An educational opportunity for auditors. Accounting Horizons, 5(2), 91–93.Google Scholar
  90. Spira, L. (1999). Independence in corporate governance: The audit committee role. Business Ethics: A European Review, 8(4), 262–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Tricker, R. I. (1978). The independent director: A study of the non-executive director and of the audit committee. Croydon: Tolley.Google Scholar
  92. Tsui, J., Subramaniam, N., & Hoy J. S. (1994). The effects of audit committees on bankers’ perceptions of auditor independence. Corporate Governance: An International Review, April, 2(2), 101–107.Google Scholar
  93. Turley, S., & Zaman, M. (2003). Public policy on corporate audit committees: Case study evidence of current practice. Occasional Research Paper No. 35, Association of Chartered Certified Accountants, London.Google Scholar
  94. Turnbull. (1999). Internal control: Guidance for directors of listed companies incorporated in the UK. London: ICAEW.Google Scholar
  95. Turner, L. E. (2001). Audit committees: A Call for Action. Speech delivered at the Conference on Accounting Irregularities II: What’s an Audit Committee To Do? 21 February 2001, Atlanta, Georgia.Google Scholar
  96. Turpin, R. A., & DeZoort, F. T. (1998). Characteristics of firms that include an audit committee report in their annual report. International Journal of Auditing, 2, 35–48.Google Scholar
  97. Vicknair, D., Hickman, K., & Carnes, K. C. (1993). A note on audit committee independence: Evidence from the NYSE on ‘‘grey’’ area directors. Accounting Horizons, Mar, 7(1), 53.Google Scholar
  98. Weisbach, M. S., & Hermalin, B. J. (2000). Board of directors as an endogenously determined institution: A survey of the economic literature. Working Paper: University of Illinois.Google Scholar
  99. Wild, J. (1994). Managerial accountability to shareholders: Audit committees and the explanatory power of earnings for returns. British Accounting Review, 26, 353–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Wild, J. (1996). The audit committee and earnings quality. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 11(2), 247–276.Google Scholar
  101. Windram, B., & Song, J. (2000). The effectiveness of audit committees: Evidence from UK companies in the Post-Cadbury period. Paper presented at the British Accounting Association Annual Conference, University of Exeter.Google Scholar
  102. Wolnizer, P. W. (1995). Are audit committees red herrings? Abacus, 31(1), 45–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Wright, D. W. (1996). Evidence on the relation between corporate governance characteristics and the quality of financial reporting. Working Paper, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  104. Zaman, M. (2001). Turnbull: generating undue expectations of the corporate governance role of audit committees. Managerial Auditing Journal, 16(1), 5–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of ManchesterManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations