Skip to main content

Blended Traditional and Virtual Seller Market Entry and Performance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

The past decade has produced much research investigating online market entry, both by blended traditional and by virtual sellers.

The MIT Center for Digital Business and the Columbia Institute for Tele-Information provided support during the time this paper was revised. Helpful comments were provided by participants in seminars at Columbia University and Curtin University. Bill Greene was generous in his assistance on the econometric method. We are grateful to Warren Kimble and Aaron Morey for excellent research assistance. The authors are responsible for all remaining errors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The survey field work is conducted by the Interviewer Quality Control Australia (IQCA) quality accredited market research firm McGregor Tan Research. The telephone interview software used to initiate the contact with respondents is the CATI (computer aided telephone interviewing system). The sample units are selected at random from the Telstra Yellow Pages. Three screening questions are asked prior to the conduct of the survey. Funding for survey is provided by Australian Research Council Large Grant No. A00105943. The questionnaire contains 59 questions. The questionnaire is comprised of the sections: (a) Respondent and Firm Profile; (b) Reasons for Entering Online Markets and Initial Investment; (c) Initial Online Market Outcomes; and (d) Online Market Futures.

  2. 2.

    BUSINESS is comprised of the ANZIC single-digit divisions: “Finance and Insurance”; “Property and Business Services”; and “Wholesale Trade.”

  3. 3.

    These variables are often considered by economists as objectives of agent optimization. Steinfield et al. (2002) argue that innovation is based on the search for synergistic opportunity. That is, aligning goals across physical and virtual channels suggests that the “parent” firm benefits from sales stemming from either channel. Higher revenues can arise from geographic and product market extension, thus adding revenue streams otherwise not feasible from physical outlets. Synergistic benefits also arise from lower costs (savings may occur through improved labor productivity, and reduced inventory, advertising and distribution costs).

  4. 4.

    Although the firms comprising the sample are “small”, the potential for scale economies arises as the employee range is [1, 200]. Also, 400 firms are located within (the large cities) of Melbourne and Sydney. Finally, only 72.4 % of the sample firms operate a single site.

  5. 5.

    Maddala (1983: 122) states that the parameters of the second equation are not identified if there are no exclusion restrictions on the exogenous variables. Wilde (2000) demonstrates, for multiple equation probit models with endogenous dummy regressors, that no restrictions are needed if there is sufficient variation in the data, viz., each equation contains at least one varying exogenous regressor.

  6. 6.

    For all probabilities to be positive requires \( 0 \,< \mu_{0} < \mu_{1} < \mu_{2} < \mu_{3} \) and \( 0 < \lambda_{0} < \lambda_{1} < \lambda_{2} < \lambda_{3} . \)

  7. 7.

    The standard errors of the coefficients for the bivariate model are not correct because of the scaling effect.

References

  • ABS (2009) Business use of information technology, 2007–2008, Catalogue 8129.0, Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • ABS (2010) Small business in Australia, Catalogue 1321.0, Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch D (1995) Innovation, growth and survival. Int J Ind Org 13:441–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeYoung R (2005) The performance of internet-based models: evidence from the banking industry. J Bus 78:893–947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinlersoz E, Pereira P (2007) On the diffusion of electronic commerce. Int J Ind Organ 25:541–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Disney R, Haskel J, Heden Y (2003) Entry, exit and establishment survival in UK manufacturing. J Ind Econ 51:91–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunt E, Harper I (2002) E-Commerce and the Australian economy. Econ Record 78:327–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman D, Sekhon J (2008) Endogeneity in Probit Response Models, Working Paper, University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Garicano L, Kaplan S (2001) The effects of business-to-business E-commerce on transactions costs. J Ind Econ 49:463–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geroski P (1995) What do we know about entry? Int J Ind Organ 13:421–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene W (2008) Econometric analysis, 6th edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman J (1978) Dummy endogenous variables in a simultaneous equation system. Econometrica 46:931–959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman J (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47:153–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman M (2002) Did first mover advantage survive the Dot.com crash?’. Working Paper, University of California, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • Litan R, Rivlin A (2001) Beyond the Dot.coms: The economic promise of the internet. Brookings Internet Policy Institute

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucking-Riley D, Spulber D (2001) Business-to-business electronic commerce. J Econ Perspect 15:55–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, GS (1983) Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Economics. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikolaeva R (2007) The dynamic nature of survival determinants in E-commerce. J Acad Mark Sci 35:560–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid G, Smith J (2000) What makes a new business start-up successful? Small Bus Econ 14:165–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmalensee R (1982) Product differentiation advantages of pioneering brands. Am Econ Rev 72:349–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Segarra A, Callejón M (2002) New firms’ survival and market turbulence: new evidence from Spain. Rev Ind Organ 20:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith M, Brynjolfsson E (2001) Consumer decision-making at an internet shopbot: brand still matters. J Ind Econ 49:541–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilde J (2000) Identification of multiple Equation probit models with endogenous dummy regressors. Econ Lett 69:309–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Randolph Beard .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Randolph Beard, T., Madden, G., Azam, M.S. (2014). Blended Traditional and Virtual Seller Market Entry and Performance. In: Alleman, J., Ní-Shúilleabháin, Á., Rappoport, P. (eds) Demand for Communications Services – Insights and Perspectives. The Economics of Information, Communication, and Entertainment. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7993-2_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics